dynamical plasma response during driven magnetic reconnection in the laboratory n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Dynamical plasma response during driven magnetic reconnection in the laboratory PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Dynamical plasma response during driven magnetic reconnection in the laboratory

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 32

Dynamical plasma response during driven magnetic reconnection in the laboratory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 92 Views
  • Uploaded on

Dynamical plasma response during driven magnetic reconnection in the laboratory. Ambrogio Fasoli * Jan Egedal MIT Physics D pt & Plasma Science and Fusion Center Ackn.: W.Fox, J.Nazemi, M.Porkolab *Now at EPFL Physics D pt & Centre de Recherche en Physique des Plasmas.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Dynamical plasma response during driven magnetic reconnection in the laboratory' - zanna


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
dynamical plasma response during driven magnetic reconnection in the laboratory
Dynamical plasma response during driven magnetic reconnection in the laboratory

Ambrogio Fasoli*

Jan Egedal

MIT

Physics Dpt & Plasma Science and Fusion Center

Ackn.: W.Fox, J.Nazemi, M.Porkolab

*Now at EPFL

Physics Dpt &Centre de Recherche en Physique des Plasmas

our definition of magnetic reconnection
Our definition of magnetic reconnection
  • Change of magnetic field topology in the presence of plasma
  • Reconnection rate: value of E-field along X-line, perpendicular to plane over which flux annihilates
outline
Outline
  • Driven reconnection in the VTF open cusp
    • Conditions to create a current channel
    • Dynamical evolution of j and E
    • j||and dE/dt linked through ionpolarization current
    • Size of diffusion region (EB0)
    • Orbit effects
  • Future work on VTF
    • New diagnostics
    • Closed cusp configuration
slide5

Magnetic Reconnection on VTF

The VTF

device

2 m

  • Origin of fast time scale for reconnection, mechanisms behind breaking of frozen-in flux
      • Particle orbits ?
      • Instabilities / waves ?
      • ….
slide6

Diagnostic ‘workhorses’ on VTF

45 heads L-probe

40 Channels B-probe

vtf configuration

Ex. of target plasma profiles

Bcusp = 50mT, Bguide= 87mT; PECRH ~ 30 kW

VTF configuration
  • lmfp>>L, tcoll>torbit,tA;ri<<L
  • S = m0LvA/h>>1
  • Plasma production by ECRH separate from reconnection drive

J.Egedal, A.Fasoli et al., RSI 71, 3351 (2000)

reconnection drive
Reconnection drive
  • Ohmic coils driven by LC resonant circuit
  • Flux swing ~ 0.2 V-s, duration ~ 6 ms (>>treconnection)
  • Vloop ~ 100 V, vExB ~ 2km/s ~ vA/10
slide9

Sketch of poloidal flux during reconnection drive

No reconnection

as in ideal MHD

Fast reconnection

as in vacuum

plasma response to driven reconnection 3
Plasma response to driven reconnection(3)
  • Current layers develop for l0=Bguide/Bcusp~3m
  • No steady-state
  • Questions:
    • How much max current / min anomalous resistivity (though ratio E/J is not constant!)?
    • What determines the size and time evolution of the diffusion region where ideal MHD breaks?
a nomalous resistivity

Ipmax [kA]

l0=Bguide/Bcusp [m]

Anomalous resistivity

- Current sustained in plasma determines reconnection rate

- For l0=Bguide/Bcusp<3m

Ip ~ 0  reconnection rate is same as in vacuum

hmeas/hSpitzervs le/l0

First observation of strongly anomalous parallel resistivity (hmeas = Ef/Jfmax)

electrostatic potential away from the x line

Ideal region:

E + v×B= 0

E · B = 0

-

Ez

-l0 l0

2x 2y

Electrostatic potential(away from the X-line)

E= Ezz - 

B=b0 ( x x – y y + l0 z)

=½Ezl0log(|x/y|)

E = Ez ( x + y + z)

observation of self consistent e s potential

½Ezl0log(x/y)

Experiment

Theory

Ez 0 Poloidal Drift

w/o e.s. potential: charge separation

No charge separation if

EtotB =½Ezl0log(x/y)

Observation of self-consistent e.s. potential

J.Egedal and A.Fasoli, PRL 86, 5047 (2001)

Deviations from EB=0 are observed close to separatrix  diffusion region

the size of the diffusion region 1
The size of the diffusion region(1)

Experimental

measurement

Frozen in law is

broken where EB0

EB=(E -) B

Fit extending form valid in ideal region

d = 3.5 cm

the size of the diffusion region 2

Neon

Nitrogen

Krypton

Xenon

The size of the diffusion region(2)
  • The size of thediffusion region is clearly independent of ionmass and ne
  • It cannot be related to c/wpi,e or ri,s
temporal evolution of the current channel
Temporal evolution of the current channel

Time

in steps

of 12 ms

Time response of the toroidal current

H2

f ~20-30 kHz

Ar

plasma response to an oscillating drive 2

In phase withVloop

900 ahead of Vloop

0 – 1.2 kA/(Vm2)

0 – 20 mAs/(Vm2)

Plasma response to an oscillating drive(2)
  • The current profile
  • can be separated in
  • two parts:

What causes the out of phase current?

ion polarization currents due to d dt
Ion polarization currents due to d/dt

Ion polarization current:

Quasi neutrality:

 fits exp. Data with  = 3.5 cm

slide22

Interpretation with polarisation current predicts time evolution and shape of current channel

MEASURED change in f and  j dt between t=0 and 30ms

THEORY / FIT

circuit model for vtf plasmas 2

Deviation?

As

the observed dependence

implies

Cj2Vloop

Cj2Vloop

[As]

[As]

Circuit model for VTF plasmas(2)
  • Total current is measured in each
  • shot by a Rogowsky coil
  • Values of R j1 and Cj2 obtained
  • by curve fitting
what breaks the frozen in condition

Would give c/wpe

too small (<103) & can’t explain phase

far too small with strong guide field, would give c/wpi

Only off-diagonal terms (toroidal symmetry)

What breaks the frozen in condition?

The plasma frozen in condition

is violated where:

Generalized Ohms law:

slide26

[cm]

Breaking the frozen in law

  • All electrons are trapped 
  • limiting macroscopic current channel
  • Electrons short circuit electric
  • fields along their orbits
  • The frozen in law is broken in areas
  • where the orbits do not follow the
  • field lines: E•B0

Orbit width, cusp= (g l0)0.5

J.Egedal, PoP 9, 1095 (2002)

conclusions
Conclusions
  • Fast, collisionless driven reconnection directly observed
    • Bguide <~ Bcusp
      • No current channel, trapped orbits; self-consistent plasma potential
    • Bguide>>Bcusp
      • Dynamic evolution of current profile and self-consistent potential
      • Classical collisions: not important
      • Ion polarisation current (analogy with RLC circuit) explains observed reconnection dynamics
      • Key parameter is
      • Diffusion region does not scale with el./ion Larmor radius, el./ion skin depth, but with characteristic particle orbit size
      • Direct measurements of different terms in generalised Ohm’s law suggest that pe (off-diagonal) and/or dJ/dtterms are needed (kinetic effect)
future developments
Future developments
  • Energy and velocity distributions
    • Laser Induced Fluorescence
      • fi(v) at one position; planar LIF fi(v, x) with intensified CCD
    • E.s. energy analyzer
  • Systematic analysis of e.s. and e.m. fluctuations
    • Spatial and temporal correlations; effect on plasma effective resistivity
  • Combined reconstruction of Y(x,t) and fe,i(v,x) around X-point

 particle energization mechanism

  • Machine upgrades
    • Increase strength of reconnection drive (reduce ECRH frequency)
    • Installation of in-vessel coils
      • Reduction in direct plasma losses: from collisionless to collisional regime
vtf diagnostics lif e g planar set up f i v k laser x y
VTF Diagnostics: LIFE.g. planar set-up: fi(vklaser,x,y)
  • Pulsed dye laser (Lambda Physik Scanmate pumped by Nd:Yag) pumps 611.5 nm line Elaser ~ 20 mJ in 10 ns
  • LIF detected at 461 nm (intensified CCD?)

2

1

3

first observation of lif on vtf arii plasma
First observation of LIF on VTF ArII plasma

Broad band, Elaser ~ 5 mJ/pulse, Dtlaser~ 15 ns

e s fluctuations during reconnection weak i p

Plasma edge

time (10-5 s)

250

250

Freq

(MHz)

Freq

(MHz)

Increased turbulence close to current channel, where gradients are large f < 100 MHz << fpe

0

0

E.S. fluctuations during reconnection, weak Ip

J(r) vs .time