1 / 21

Program Models for Networked Services Coordinating Youth Services

Program Models for Networked Services Coordinating Youth Services California Youth Council Institute May 14 - 15, 2002. Connecting Daisy Petals into Programs. WIA calls for ‘networked youth services’ The “DAISY” is one way to depict a networked system

Download Presentation

Program Models for Networked Services Coordinating Youth Services

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Program Models for Networked Services Coordinating Youth Services California Youth Council Institute May 14 - 15, 2002

  2. Connecting Daisy Petals into Programs • WIA calls for ‘networked youth services’ • The “DAISY” is one way to depict a networked system • Growing a daisy is a multi-year process • Resource mapping is used to describe the details of every petal in your daisy

  3. Program Models in a WIA Context • Critical issue: are you “buying slots” or are you “networking services”? • Under WIA, the unit of “program” is the entire community -- all youth service elements together! • Primary role of LWIB/YC is to create operational connections across services.

  4. A Wild Daisy: Tucson! • In transition to an client-centered service system • www.csd.co.pima.az.us/rfpq/youthrfp.html • Centralized framework and case management services at the one stop centers (but case management to be provided through contract) • RFQ process to pre-qualify youth service vendors • Youth-by-youth service plans

  5. Pima’s RFQ line-up • Case management RFP • Youth Work Experience/Work-Readiness RFQ • Youth Academic Instruction RFQ • Youth Occupational Training RFQ • Youth Development RFQ

  6. What has Pima learned? • It works • Vendors provide what they are good at • Open-ended RFQ process, including TA • Significant case management training • Help vendors develop “unit cost-per service” • Vendors need to accept degree of service risk • Need for YC staff to manage/track service times and availability • Unusual model for YO as well as WIA

  7. “It’s the network, stupid” • WIA has the same generic steps as many other youth-serving programs • If you align the steps, you align the services • The devil really is in the [operational] details

  8. Service flow for court-involved youth

  9. What do you need? • Working agreement -- CYA and WIA • Connected information system • Agreed use of assessment tools • Agreed content and format of ISS • Process to decide how services are paid for • Agreement on case management • Agreement on performance reporting

  10. What does WIA get? • System referrals • Youth-serving partners • Leverage -- services and resources • Clear role for framework and content services • System impact

  11. Service flow for foster youth

  12. Service flow for alt-ed system

  13. What is different about Alt-Ed? • Youth are not attached to system partner • WIA framework services and content services are more central to strategy • LWIB/YC works with schools to create options -- and funds to follow youth into alternative programs • WIA has primary case management role

  14. System-building models • Seattle: Funding a collaborative group of youth development providers rather than one ‘prime’ • www.doleta.gov/regions/reg06/documents/bpyaksum.cfm • Corning, NY: Require multiple providers to respond to an RFP in partnerships • www.workforce2.org

  15. System building - leveraging resources • Identify flexible dollars • Indianapolis -- Youth Employment • One stop center includes 47 providers • www.ipic.org/initiatives.htm

  16. Career dev Academic Support Boys & Girls Club TYC & courts Assessment, ISS, Case Mgmt, Follow-up Foster care Summer Jobs Teen Parents Big Brothers School- to-career

  17. Budget tools for systembuilding • First handout: “Youth GED” line item budget • 2d handout: “YouthWorks” line item budget • 3d handout: resource mapping result • 4th handout: Integrated Budget for “Project Thunder”

  18. Who pays for service plan?

  19. Project Thunder budget • Focus on the functions of the project costs • Each source of funds pays for services (expenses) it is permitted to support • Every contributor gets leverage • Every youth gets multiple services • The total performance gets measured and reported even though WIA funded only 1/7th of the program cost.

  20. Impact on operations and performance • “Thunder integration” happens when LWIB/YC is a convenor and partner, not just a funder • YC is proactive, not reactive, to service opportunities • Able to better target strategic needs • Integration requires clear operational links (framework services) with other • YC staff are linkers, brokers, and connectors

More Related