1 / 33

SEMO Region, Missouri

Target Industry Cluster Analysis. SEMO Region, Missouri. 01. 02. 03. Overview. Target Industry Clusters. Table of contents. Industry Cluster Analysis. 01 overview. SEMO Region, MO. SEMO Region. Overview.

ygravley
Download Presentation

SEMO Region, Missouri

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Target Industry Cluster Analysis SEMO Region, Missouri

  2. 01 02 03 Overview Target Industry Clusters Table of contents Industry Cluster Analysis

  3. 01 • overview SEMO Region, MO

  4. SEMO Region Overview • The SEMO region is comprised of four Missouri counties. Ste. Genevieve County forms the border with Illinois. • Iron • Madison • Ste. Genevieve • St. Francois section 01

  5. 02 • industry cluster analysis SEMO Region, MO

  6. Industry cluster analysis How to interpret cluster data resultsThe graph’s four quadrants tell a different story for each cluster. Contains clusters that are more concentrated in the region and are growing. These clusters are strengths that help a community stand out from the competition. Small, high-growth clusters can be expected to become more dominant over time. Contains clusters that are more concentrated in the region but are declining (negative growth). These clusters typically fall into the lower quadrant as job losses cause a decline in concentration. Mature Top left (strong but declining) Stars Top right (strong and advancing) Emerging Bottom right (weak but advancing) Transforming Bottom left (weak and declining) Contains clusters that are under-represented in the region (low concentration) and are also losing jobs. Clusters in this region may indicate a gap in the workforce pipeline if local industries anticipate a future need. In general, clusters in this quadrant show a lack of competitiveness. Contains clusters that are under-represented in the region but are growing, often quickly. If growth trends continue, these clusters will eventually move into the top right quadrant. Clusters in this quadrant are considered emerging strengths for the region. section 02 • Modified from: http://www.charlestonregionaldata.com/bubble-chart-explanation/

  7. Cluster bubble chart, 2009-2014 Industry cluster analysis * Note: Label includes cluster name, LQ 2014, and Employment 2014 section 02 • Source: EMSI 2014.4 (QCEW Employees, Non-QCEW Employees, Self-Employed, and Extended Proprietors); Industry cluster definitions by PCRD

  8. Manufacturing sub-cluster, 2009-2014 Industry cluster analysis Star Mature Transforming Emerging * Note: Label includes cluster name, LQ 2014, and Employment 2014; section 02 • Source: EMSI 2014.4 (QCEW Employees, Non-QCEW Employees, Self-Employed, and Extended Proprietors); Industry cluster definitions by PCRD

  9. Industry cluster analysis, 2009-2014 Level of Specialization Percent Growth in Specialization Note: Computer & Electronic Product does not exist; Electrical Equipment & Appliances and Primary Metal Mfg. have too less number of jobs. section 02

  10. Industry cluster analysis Bubble chart interpretation Mature Industries Six industry clusters in the SEMO Region are in the Maturing stage: Mining, Glass & Ceramics, Chemicals/Chemical-based Products, Forest & Wood Products, Fabricated Metal Product Mfg. and Machinery Manufacturing. These industries are relatively concentrated, but their growth is trending downward. It is worth noting, however, that the SEMO Region may find it worthwhile to invest in efforts to shore up the concentration of these industries. Transforming Industries Transforming clusters capture the mix of industries that are experiencing relative decline and limited export capability. In the SEMO Region nine clusters are in this group with Energy, Advanced Materials, Manufacturing Supercluster, and Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Visitor Industries being the largest by employment. However, any amount of growth in these industries would require relatively large investments. Star Industries Star industry clusters are highly concentrated, exporting and still experiencing growth in the region. The most highly concentrated of the Star industry clusters in the SEMO Region are Agribusiness, Food Processing & Technology, Biomedical/Biotechnical (Life Science), and Transportation & Logistics clusters. Emerging Industries Industry clusters that may be poised for future growth are classified as “Emerging.” There are three clusters in the region: Business & Financial Services, Transportation Equipment Manufacturing, and Information Technology & Telecommunications. section 02 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2014.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  11. 03 • target industry clusters Biomedical/Biotechnical (Life Sciences) Mining Transportation Equipment Manufacturing Agribusiness, Food Processing and Technology Forest and Wood Products

  12. Biomedical/Biotechnical (Life Sciences) Cluster Shift-Share Analysis by Top Industry Sectors: SEMO Region, MO Note: Upward arrow ( ) indicates regional competitiveness. section 03 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2014.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  13. Biomedical/Biotechnical (Life Sciences) Cluster Top 15 Inputs by Dollars: SEMO Region, MO Note: * industry sector has less than 10 jobs as calculated by EMSI; ** industry sector is not present in the region . section 03 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2014.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  14. Biomedical/Biotechnical (Life Sciences) Cluster Top 15 Inputs by Dollars: SEMO Region, MO Note: ** industry sector is not present in the region . section 03 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2014.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  15. Biomedical/Biotechnical (Life Sciences) Cluster Top Occupations: SEMO Region, MO Note: SOC (Standard Occupation Classification) 5-digit occupations are included by jobs in 2014. section 03 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2014.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  16. Mining Cluster Shift-Share Analysis by Top Industry Sectors: SEMO Region, MO Note: Upward arrow ( ) indicates regional competitiveness. EMSI does not show sufficient jobs for Iron Ore Mining; Construction Sand and Gravel Mining; Industrial Sand Mining; and Support Activities for Nonmetallic Minerals (except Fuels) Mining. section 03 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2014.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  17. Mining Cluster Top 15 Inputs by Dollars: SEMO Region, MO Note: * industry sector has less than 10 jobs as calculated by EMSI; ** industry sector is not present in the region . section 03 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2014.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  18. Mining Cluster Top 15 Inputs by Dollars: SEMO Region, MO Note: ** industry sector is not present in the region . section 03 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2014.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  19. Mining Cluster Top Occupations: SEMO Region, MO Note: SOC (Standard Occupation Classification) 5-digit occupations are included by jobs in 2014. section 03 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2014.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  20. Transportation Equipment Manufacturing Cluster Shift-Share Analysis by Top Industry Sectors: SEMO Region, MO Note: Upward arrow ( ) indicates regional competitiveness. EMSI does not show sufficient jobs for Boat Building; Travel Trailer and Camper Manufacturing; Motor Vehicle Body Manufacturing; Other Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing; and All Other Transportation Equipment Manufacturing. section 03 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2014.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  21. Transportation Equipment Manufacturing Cluster Top 15 Inputs by Dollars: SEMO Region, MO Note: * industry sector has less than 10 jobs as calculated by EMSI; ** industry sector is not present in the region . section 03 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2014.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  22. Transportation Equipment Manufacturing Cluster Top 15 Inputs by Dollars: SEMO Region, MO Note: ** industry sector is not present in the region . section 03 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2014.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  23. Transportation Equipment Manufacturing Cluster Top Occupations: SEMO Region, MO EMSI shows insufficient information for the jobs in occupations. section 03 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2014.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  24. Agribusiness, Food Processing and Technology Cluster Shift-Share Analysis by Top Industry Sectors: SEMO Region, MO Note: Upward arrow ( ) indicates regional competitiveness. EMSI does not show sufficient jobs for Confectionery Manufacturing from Purchased Chocolate; Meat Processed from Carcasses; Commercial Bakeries; Retain Bakeries; Ice Cream and Frozen Dessert Manufacturing; Livestock Merchant Wholesalers; Crop Harvesting, Primarily by Machine; Postharvest Crop Activities (except Cotton Ginning); Farm Management Services; etc. section 03 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2014.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  25. Agribusiness, Food Processing and Technology Cluster Top 15 Inputs by Dollars: SEMO Region, MO Note: * industry sector has less than 10 jobs as calculated by EMSI; ** industry sector is not present in the region . section 03 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2014.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  26. Agribusiness, Food Processing and Technology Cluster Top 15 Inputs by Dollars: SEMO Region, MO Note: ** industry sector is not present in the region . section 03 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2014.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  27. Agribusiness, Food Processing and Technology Cluster Top Occupations: SEMO Region, MO Note: SOC (Standard Occupation Classification) 5-digit occupations are included by jobs in 2014. section 03 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2014.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  28. Forest And Wood Products Cluster Shift-Share Analysis by Top Industry Sectors: SEMO Region, MO Note: Upward arrow ( ) indicates regional competitiveness. EMSI does not include detailed sectors for Forest Nurseries and Gathering of Forest Products. section 03 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2014.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  29. Forest And Wood Products Cluster Top 15 Inputs by Dollars: SEMO Region, MO Note: * industry sector has less than 10 jobs as calculated by EMSI; ** industry sector is not present in the region . section 03 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2014.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  30. Forest And Wood Products Cluster Top 15 Inputs by Dollars: SEMO Region, MO Note: ** industry sector is not present in the region . section 03 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2014.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  31. Forest And Wood Products Cluster Top Occupations: SEMO Region, MO Note: SOC (Standard Occupation Classification) 5-digit occupations are included by jobs in 2014. section 03 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2014.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  32. Report ContributorsThis report was prepared by the Purdue Center for Regional Development, in partnership with the Southern Rural Development Center and USDA Rural Development, in support of the Stronger Economies Together program. Report Authors Bo Beaulieu, PhD Indraneel Kumar, PhD Andrey Zhalnin, PhD Data Analysis Ayoung Kim Francisco Scott Report Design Tyler Wright This report was supported, in part, by grant from the USDA Rural Development through the auspices of the Southern Rural Development Center. It was produced in support of the Stronger Economies Together (SET) program.

  33. For more information, • please contact: • Dr. Bo Beaulieu, • PCRD Director: • ljb@purdue.edu • Or • 765-494-7273 The Purdue Center for Regional Development (PCRD) seeks to pioneer new ideas and strategies that contribute to regional collaboration, innovation and prosperity. June 2015

More Related