1 / 9

Detection of bacteria in blood products

Detection of bacteria in blood products. Ineke Rood Blood cell Research, Sanquin research Medical Microbiology en Infection control , VU medical centre. Bacteria in platelet concentrates. ~1 in 300 PCs contain bacteria Storage conditions PCs 24 °C Shaking Sources of contamination

xuan
Download Presentation

Detection of bacteria in blood products

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Detection of bacteria in blood products Ineke Rood Blood cell Research, Sanquin research Medical Microbiology en Infection control , VU medical centre

  2. Bacteria in platelet concentrates • ~1 in 300 PCs contain bacteria • Storage conditions PCs • 24°C • Shaking • Sources of contamination • Bacteria from skin • Bacteremia

  3. BacT/Alert • 2001; nationwide screening for bacterial contamination with the BacT/Alert culture system • (+) High sensitivity, 1 to 10 CFU/ml • (+) Detection within 24 to 48 hours • (-) PC are issued as ‘negative to date’

  4. Real time PCR assay • 2003; development of NAT • 16S rRNA gene • (+) Conserved in bacteria • (+) Multiple copies within the bacterial genome • (-) Presence of exogenous DNA in reagents

  5. Sensitivity Real time PCR assay • Sensitivity DNA assay; • E. coli 170 CFU/ml • S. epidermidis 750 CFU/ml Background signal PC

  6. Sensitivity Real time RT-PCR assay • Sensitivity RNA assay; • E. coli 3 CFU/ml • S. epidermidis 80 CFU/ml

  7. BacT/ALERT versus PCR • Spiking of PCs with bacteria (< 1 CFU/ml) • Staphylococcus epidermidis • Streptococcus pyogenes • Klebsiella pneumoniae • Eschericha coli • BacT/ALERT • Inoculation of culture bottles directly after spiking • PCR assay • Take samples 0, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 144 h after spiking

  8. BacT/ALERT versus PCR • AStaphylococcus epidermidis B Streptococcus pyogenes • C Klebsiella pneumoniae D Eschericha coli • N Controle (negative) PCs

  9. Conclusions • PCR assay • Better sensitivity with RNA detection • DNA/RNA extraction from Gram+ bacteria needs improvement • Background signal renders sensitivity • PCR assay versus BacT/ALERT • BacT/ALERT is very sensitive • BacT/ALERT can give false negative results when PCs are inoculated with low bacterial titers • Real Time RT-PCR detects PCs with low bacterial titers but at a later moment • PCR assay can be used shortly before transfusion

More Related