1 / 6

Schemas - The story so far… Steve Fisher / RAL

Schemas - The story so far… Steve Fisher / RAL. www.eu-egee.org. EGEE is a project funded by the European Union under contract IST-2003-508833. Principles. Should be simple Conceptually Practically Should be reasonably safe Low network traffic and load on servers

wwheeler
Download Presentation

Schemas - The story so far… Steve Fisher / RAL

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Schemas - The story so far…Steve Fisher / RAL www.eu-egee.org EGEE is a project funded by the European Union under contract IST-2003-508833

  2. Principles • Should be simple • Conceptually • Practically • Should be reasonably safe • Low network traffic and load on servers • Avoid human intervention • No masters • No ability for one component to block everything

  3. Operations to consider • createTable • Should be fairly quick • dropTable • Can be slow – provided it does not impede createTable • alterAuthorization • Must be acted upon rapidly • It may be enough that new operations get the new authz – i.e. don’t worry about existing streaming • This could be a frequent operation – but for now we have to guess

  4. Three ideas so far • 2PC and Master – from John • Complete but does not do too well against my criteria • Versioned tables – from Steve F • Not at well worked through as John’s • Tightly coupled or Versioned tables – from Steve H • First solution is like John’s and second like mine

  5. 2PC and master • createTable • Goes via master and is fanned out to slaves • dropTable • 2PC including registries • alterAuthorization • Probably 2PC • Pros • Fairly completely worked out • createTable is fast • Cons • Single point of failure • Manual intervention

  6. Versioned Tables • createTable • 2 PC on schema – each table is identified by a number for all time • No master • dropTable • 2PC on schema – leave registries to get on with their job • alterAuthorization • 2PC on schema • Pros • No humans and no masters • Schema and registry well separated • Cons • Not fully worked out • Create table could be blocked • Interesting • Producers and Consumers talk to the schema – the Registry does not

More Related