1 / 24

The idea

The idea. Project data. DRIVER is a (small) FP6 STREP http://cordis.europa.eu/fp6/instr_strp.htm in http://cordis.europa.eu/ist/ with overall budget of M€ 2,507 and EC contribution of M€ 1,835 starting at 01/06/2006 for a period of 18 months

wilma
Download Presentation

The idea

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The idea

  2. Project data • DRIVER is a (small) FP6 STREP http://cordis.europa.eu/fp6/instr_strp.htm in http://cordis.europa.eu/ist/ • with overall budget of M€ 2,507 and EC contribution of M€ 1,835 • starting at 01/06/2006 for a period of 18 months • Web: http://www.driver-repository.eu/

  3. Open access testbed “DRIVER sets out to build the testbed for a future knowledge infrastructure of the European Research Area […] DRIVER will deliver the content resources, i.e. any form of scientific output, including scientific/technical reports, working papers, pre-prints, articles and original research data.”

  4. National agents “The knowledge infrastructure testbed, delivered by DRIVER, will be based on nationally organized digital repository infrastructures […] The successful DARE network in the Netherlands, recently presented to the public by the project partner SURF, will serve as model to DRIVER.”

  5. Two layer concept (1/2) “DRIVER with its testbed will not build a specific digital repository system with pre-defined services, based on a specific technology and serving dedicated communities. The testbed will in its inception focus on theinfrastructure aspect, i.e., open, clearly defined interfaces to the content network, which allow any qualified service-provider to build services on top of it.”

  6. Two layer concept (2/2) Services Research Subject repositories, refereed portals, databases, collaboratories, (Open Access) journals, ... Society Education Institutional windows, professional journals, personal Web sites, national windows, Google ... Virtual Learning Environments (Blackboard, HIVE, etc) Course Ware, Readers, ... Harvesters Institutional Repository Minho ArXiv ….. TUDelft Soton Content Grid .... CNRS MIT

  7. Building Infrastructure Middleware Development/Implementation Content Organisation and Provision ISTI-CNR UniBie / UniGoe Focussed Studies Raising Awareness blocks UniNott SURF Pan-European DR Infrastructure via FP7

  8. DRIVER Partners Greece, UoANational and Capodistrian University of Athens, Administrative Co-ordination Germany, SUBNiedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen, Germany Scientifc-Technical Co-ordination France, CNRS*Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe / CNRS DIS, France Poland, ICMInterdiscipl. Centre for Math. and Comp. Mod. /Univers. of Warsaw, Poland Italy, CNR*Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione "A. FAEDO" / CNR, Italy The Netherlands, SURF*SURF Foundation, The Netherlands UK, UKOLNUK Office for Library and Information Networking, University of Bath Belgium, UGhentUniversity Library Ghent, Belgium UK, UniNottUniversity of Nottingham, United Kingdom Germany, UB-BiUniversitätsbibliothek Bielefeld, Germany * national organizations

  9. DRIVER Work Packages t e s t b e d

  10. Content providers Incremental approach: • test bed • spring 2007 with experimental group of 51 repositories* from: BE (Ghent), DE (DINI), FR (CNRS), NL (DARE), UK (SHERPA) • International meeting planned for 6. February 2007 • draft guidelines of content providers • systematic test bed testing • test bed extended • to be designed on the basis of experience with 1. • presumably summer 2007 • include e.g. PT, DK, ES, GR, FI, IT, NO, PL, SE … & individuals • organisational structure • to be designed on the basis of experience with 1. & 2. * See appended slides

  11. Content providers Requirements for eligibility still under debate. E.g. • DINI certificate • OpenDOAR criteria • DARE guidelines Settled on 6 February 2007 New partners invited on 7 February 2007 Quality of data layer is crucial for quality of services

  12. Software architecture

  13. Aggregator Quality instrument for harvesting: • checks OAI protocol compliance • list of repositories and their characteristics (e.g. base url, supported formats, platform, sets, log of harvests, country, …) • normalizes harvested result by e.g. quality check of metadata, filtering on rights level (open access, licenced, embargoed), link to full text checking, prepares indexing, … DRIVER will use SAHARA (= Open source DARE harvester/aggregator)

  14. Metadata guidelines DC, plus rules for e.g. • document identifier • author identifier • provenance • date stamp (refresh vs incremental harvesting, deletes) • classification scheme (DEWEY?) Settled on 6 February 2007

  15. Issues • which index/search engine: Lucene and/or Fast? • mapping e.g. MARC, IEEE LOM, METS, … to DC • authentication only for profiling and recommendation/RSS • no sets but filters for document type, status, language, … (quality of metadata is critical) • automated classification e.g. based on DEWEY, for discipline based services • resource harvesting (not supported by OAI PMH, DARE has developed XML container) for e.g. • long term preservation • full text indexing

  16. DRIVER Studies • Inventory of EU repositories • Studies of related issues • Investigation of technical standards

  17. DRIVER Studies • Inventory of EU repositories Deliverable: A complete inventory of the present state of Digital Repositories in all 25 countries of the European Union. A Digital Repository in this study is defined as (1) containing research output (2) institutional or thematic and (3) OIA compliant. Preliminary results: www.pleiade.nl/wiki Please complete!

  18. DRIVER Studies • Studies of related issues • Business models, Key Perspectives/Alma Swan • IPR, SURF/Wilma Mossink • Long term preservation, KB/Barbara Sierman • Data curation, KNAW-DANS/Rene van Horik • IR population, Tilburg University/Vanessa Proudman Workshop in March to discuss draft (-> WP8) Deliverable: A DRIVER’s guide for IR managers

  19. DRIVER Studies • Investigation of technical standards • metadata (formats, qualifiers) • content description (document types, versions) • data modeling • complex documents • identifier (documents, authors, institutes)

  20. DRIVER Advocacy Awareness-raising and Advocacy programme • Raise awareness of: • Open Access - repositories - DRIVER • Support work to establish: • repositories - regional support network - repository networks • Provide information on: • advocacy materials - advocacy strategies - advice & resources • Active outreach • Efficient response • Comprehensive information

  21. Content providers testbed repositories first batch (1/2) SHERPA http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/repositories/index.html • University of Birmingham - EPrints Service • University of Bristol - Bristol Rep. of Schl. Eprints (ROSE) • British Library - EPrints • University of Cambridge - DSpace @ Cambridge • University of Durham - Durham E-Print Repository • University of Edinburgh - Edinburgh Research Archive (ERA) • University of Glasgow - Glasgow ePrints Service • London LEAP Consortium • Birkbeck College - Birkbeck ePrints • Imperial College - Imperial Eprints • Kings College - King's ePrints • LSE - LSE Research Online • Royal Holloway - Royal Holloway Research Online • SOAS - SOAS Eprints • UCL - UCL Eprints • University of Newcastle upon Tyne - E-Print Pilot • University of Nottingham - Nottingham ePrints • University of Oxford - Oxford Eprints • White Rose Partnership - White Rose Consortium e • University of Leeds • University of Sheffield DARE http://www.darenet.nl/nl/page/language.view/repositories • Amsterdam University Press • Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam • Fontys Hogescholen • KNAW • NWO • Open Universiteit Nederland • Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen • Rijksuniversiteit Groningen • Technische Universiteit Delft • Technische Universiteit Eindhoven • Universiteit Leiden • Universiteit Maastricht • Universiteit Twente • Universiteit Utrecht • Universiteit van Amsterdam • Universiteit van Tilburg • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

  22. Content providers testbed repositories first batch (2/2) DINI http://www.dini.de/dini/zertifikat/zertifiziert.php • Universität Kassel KOBRA - Kasseler Online Bibliothek, Repository und Archiv • Universität Bielefeld BieSOn - Bielefelder Server für Online-Publikationen • Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg TUBdok • Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Bremen - Dokumentser • Universität Ulm Volltextserver der Universität Ulm (VTS) • Universität Göttingen Webdoc-Server • Hochschule für bildende Künste Hamburgask 23 • Universität Heidelberg HeiDok • SLUB Dresden / TU Dresden HSSS Hochschulschriftenserver • Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim MADOC: Mannheim Electronic DOCument Server der Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim • Universität Mainz ArchiMeD - Hochschulpublikations-Server der Universität Mainz • Universitätsbibliothek Hohenheim OPUS Hohenheim • PsyDok - Volltextserver der Virtuellen Fachbibliothek Psychologie • SciDok - Der Wissenschafts-Server der Universität des Saarlandes • Universität StuttgartOPUS - Online Publikationsverbund der Universität Stuttgart • Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen TOBIAS-lib • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin EDOC-Server • Universitaet Duisburg-Essen, Campus Duisburg Duisburger Elektronische Texte (DuetT) • Technische Universität Chemnitz MONARCH (Multimedia ONline ARchiv CHemnitz) Ghent CNRS • TEL • HAL • EduTice • SIC • IJN • MEMSIC

  23. DRIVER Partners Administrative Co-ordination UoANational and Capodistrian University of Athens, Greece Mike Hatzolopoulos, Yannis Ioannidis, Natalia Manola, Vassili Stoumpos, Antonis Lebessis Scientifc-Technical Co-ordination SUBNiedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen, Germany Norbert Lossau, Heike Neuroth, Wolfram Horstmann CNRS*Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe / CNRS DIS, France Francis Andre, Muriel Foullonneau ICMInterdiscipl. Centre for Math. and Comp. Mod. /Univers. of Warsaw, Poland Wojtek Sylvetsrzak, Jaroslaw Wypychowksi CNR*Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione "A. FAEDO" / CNR, Italy Donatella Castelli, Pasquale Pagano, Paolo Manghi SURF*SURF Foundation, The Netherlands Leo Waaijers, Martin Feijen, Maurits van der Graaf, Vanessa Proudman, Alma Swan … UKolnUK Office for Library and Information Networking, University of Bath Liz Lyon, Rachel Heery UGhentUniversity Library Ghent, Belgium Sylvia van Peteghem, Karen van Godtsenhoven, Patrick Hochstenbach UniNottUniversity of Nottingham, United Kingdom Stephen Pinfield, Bill Hubbard, Gareth Johnson, Mary Robinson UB-BiUniversitätsbibliothek Bielefeld, Germany Michael Höppner, Friedrich Summann, Marek Imialek * national organizations

  24. Work packages t e s t b e d

More Related