1 / 21

Review of the Literature Search

Seminar „Ausgewählte Beiträge zum Software Engineering“ Part II: Outline/Paper/LaTeX Christopher Oezbek Freie Universität Berlin, Institut für Informatik http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/inst/ag-se/. Review of the Literature Search. Share your experiences! What worked, what didn't?

Download Presentation

Review of the Literature Search

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Seminar „Ausgewählte Beiträgezum Software Engineering“Part II: Outline/Paper/LaTeXChristopher OezbekFreie Universität Berlin, Institut für Informatikhttp://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/inst/ag-se/ Christopher Oezbek, oezbek@inf.fu-berlin.de1

  2. Review of the Literature Search • Share your experiences! • What worked, what didn't? • Where was progress easy and where was it hard? • Which tips were useful and which useless? • What would you do differently? • How much time did you invest? • Comments in general? Christopher Oezbek, oezbek@inf.fu-berlin.de2

  3. Review of the Summaries you have written • Most of you did an okay job • Still a lot of room for improvement • All the typical mistakes present • Please be aware that these mistakes will not be tolerated in your final version Christopher Oezbek, oezbek@inf.fu-berlin.de3

  4. Common Mistakes when writing a paper • No clear train of thought • No connections • No separations • No concept • Too complicated sentences • Lack of citations • Proof missing • Plagiarism • Usage of imprecise words and fillers • Spelling and commas • Mixing up English and German Christopher Oezbek, oezbek@inf.fu-berlin.de4

  5. No train of thought - No Connections • Train of though is the single most important property of a paper. • Without it people will not be able to follow you. • To achieve this make sure that you connect sentences and paragraphs using an explicit structure or connector words. Christopher Oezbek, oezbek@inf.fu-berlin.de5

  6. No train of thought - No Separations • The converse of the above • Sentences need to be separated using paragraphs, enumerations or separator-words (like "Next", "On the contrary", "Afterwards"), otherwise they can be very confusing to read. Christopher Oezbek, oezbek@inf.fu-berlin.de6

  7. No concept • This is most important for the talk but also has implications for the paper. • Make sure that you have a structure in your explanations • There should be healthy mix of theory and examples. • If you forget the examples then the paper is to abstract. • If you forgo the theory your paper lacks depth. • Combine complicated material and easy summeries. • Not everybody can follow your explanations. Provide backup routes and key-frames to reset from. • Concept and train of thought are the same issue on different levels. Christopher Oezbek, oezbek@inf.fu-berlin.de7

  8. Too complicated sentences • Watch out for sentences that are nested too deep. • You should read over them several times and detangle them. • Suggestion: Im ersten Teil des Textes werden Terminologie und folgende Gliederung für empirische Untersuchungen nach Fenton und Pfleeger (1997) vorgestellt: ... Christopher Oezbek, oezbek@inf.fu-berlin.de8

  9. Lack of Citation - Plagiarism • If you quote passages from other publications, then you need to mark them using quotes and a link into your reference section. • Same holds for ideas (even if you paraphrase them). • If you copy text from other authors without citing them, you risk losing your reputation as a scientist (and your certificate in this seminar). Christopher Oezbek, oezbek@inf.fu-berlin.de9

  10. Lack of Citation - Proof missing • It is easy to jump to conclusions that you cannot back up with a logical argumentation or experimental results. • Be aware that experienced readers will not tolerate remarks that don't stand on solid grounds. Christopher Oezbek, oezbek@inf.fu-berlin.de10

  11. Wrong use of Citation • Don't overdo the use of literal citations. • Just copying the words of important authors does not make the paper valuable. Christopher Oezbek, oezbek@inf.fu-berlin.de11

  12. Use of imprecise words and fillers • Make sure that words like "maybe", "probably", "for sure", "certainly", don't weaken your argumentation. Christopher Oezbek, oezbek@inf.fu-berlin.de12

  13. Spelling and Commas • Use a spellchecker (!) • Review your comma-knowledge. Christopher Oezbek, oezbek@inf.fu-berlin.de13

  14. Mixing up English and German • Use the following rule when adding English terms to a German paper. • All terms should be used in German unless no appropriate German translation can be found (P2P). • On the first occurrence you should list the English term in parenthesis. • If you have to have the English term => italics. • Watch out that you don't translate to literally from English. There are a lot of "False Friends" out there. Christopher Oezbek, oezbek@inf.fu-berlin.de14

  15. LaTeX and Under- and Overfullboxes • To help LaTeX with splitting words on line boundaries you have to add "\-" into words that are not in the dictionary at all positions where the word could be split. • This gives hints to the LaTeX compiler where split. • For instance: Ver\-ständ\-nis\-feh\-ler Christopher Oezbek, oezbek@inf.fu-berlin.de15

  16. Here the same points with a positive spin • Make sure that your paper has... • Good structure • Clear train of thought • Good understandability • Good readability • Clean Layout • Illustrating Examples and Pictures • Correct Spelling and Grammar • Logical sound argumentations and citations to back them up Christopher Oezbek, oezbek@inf.fu-berlin.de16

  17. LaTeX - Why? • We want to use LaTeX for all the documents produced. This has several reasons: • LaTeX is the standard for scientific documents. • You should have come in contact with this system so that you can contrast it to What You See Is What You Get solutions like Word. • It is easy to enforce a unified look and feel for a set of documents produced by different authors. Christopher Oezbek, oezbek@inf.fu-berlin.de17

  18. LaTeX - How? • What you should do (Windows instructions): • Install Miktex - A windows distribution for LaTeX. • Install TeXnicCenter - A powerful editor for LaTeX sources. • Get the template LaTeX files from the Paper-Template.zip. • It contains a little demonstration LaTeX file that has a lot of the important features that you will need to write your paper. • The Not So Short Introduction to LaTeX2 • Lyx - Is an editor for LaTeX that is kind of a hybrid between LaTeX and Word. Lyx tries to display what it thinks LaTeX will produce, but uses LaTeX in the background. It works mainly on Linux. • TeXmacs - GNU TeXmacs is a free scientific text editor, which was both inspired by TeX and GNU Emacs. Christopher Oezbek, oezbek@inf.fu-berlin.de18

  19. Outline • The outline should present the vision of what you would like to present from the topic and structure it in a way that can be followed by the reader. • Ask yourself the question: "Which three things do I want people to remember from my talk?" • The general structure of a paper is the following: • Introduction - Open the topic, place it inside the context of the seminar, motivation • Fundamentals / Definitions - Explains requirements that are necessary for understanding. • - n. Main aspects to be discussed • = n+1. Conclusion, criticism, look-ahead (i.e. where to do research), review of used papers. Christopher Oezbek, oezbek@inf.fu-berlin.de19

  20. Assignment (II) • Create an outline for your topic. • Make an appointment with me before the next session (11.07.05). • We will discuss the outline. • Fill gaps in your conceptual understanding and find rationals/papers for missing logical links. • References • Markus Kalb, 2004. Anforderungen und Tipps. • Hinweise zur Bearbeitung eines Seminarthemas (RWTH Aachen) Christopher Oezbek, oezbek@inf.fu-berlin.de20

  21. Thank you! Christopher Oezbek, oezbek@inf.fu-berlin.de21

More Related