1 / 18

AGENDA

AGENDA. Review outcomes for the day Workshop 1: CFAs – Quality Indicators Workshop 2: Proficiency Level Descriptions Next Steps: Implementation of Quality Indicators and PLDs at the building level. PRIORITY: DEVELOP & DEPLOY CFAS. LEARNING TARGETS. CRITERIA FOR SUCCESS.

Download Presentation

AGENDA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AGENDA • Review outcomes for the day • Workshop 1: CFAs – Quality Indicators • Workshop 2: Proficiency Level Descriptions • Next Steps: Implementation of Quality Indicators and PLDs at the building level 1

  2. PRIORITY: DEVELOP & DEPLOY CFAS LEARNING TARGETS CRITERIA FOR SUCCESS Examine CFAs using a variety of lenses Articulate how PLDs can influence the quality of CFA development; articulate how PLDs can be valuable in PLC leadership work with teachers • I can recognize quality indicators for designing Common Formative Assessments (CFAs). • I understand the value and importance of using proficiency level descriptions (PLDs). 2

  3. Essential Questions • What might be some effective ways to approach implementation of • Quality indicators of CFAs • Proficiency Level Descriptions at the building level? 3

  4. Steps to Creating a Quality CFA 4

  5. EXAMINING COMMON FORMATIVE ASSESSMENTS • Individually (or in your school teams) examine CFAs from your staff. • Based on what you see, what makes a quality assessment? • Be prepared to share. 5 minutes 5

  6. How are we assessing? Norm-Referenced Criterion-Referenced Compares performance to pre-established standard Proficiency is determined before the assessment Proficiency is NOT arbitrary • Compares performance to peers • Proficiency is determined after the assessment • Proficiency is arbitrary 6

  7. QUALITY INDICATORS: DESIGN OF CFAS • The assessment is collaboratively developed (to allow teachers in the same grades or departments to measure the same things in the same way). • The assessment is aligned with the power standards. • The assessment is tied tightly to clearly identified learning targets within the power standards. • The assessment is written around 1-3 of the most important learning targets. • The assessment adheres to sound method and design elements (see “Test-Item Quality Checklist,” which provides guidelines for gathering reliable information about student learning). 7

  8. EXAMINING COMMON FORMATIVE ASSESSMENTS • Individually (or in your school teams) examine CFAs from your staff. • Based on the Quality Indicators, how does your assessment of your CFAs change? • Be prepared to share. 5 minutes 8

  9. Workshop 1: Debrief • What is the value in knowing and using the Quality Indicators for Design of CFAs? 9

  10. Example • Household Standard 1.1: The child will be able to get him/herself dressed in the morning to begin the school day. • LT 1: I can pick out appropriate clothing. • LT 2: I can put my clothes on. 10

  11. QUALITY INDICATORS: DESIGN OF CFAS • The assessment is collaboratively developed (to allow teachers in the same grades or departments to measure the same things in the same way). • The assessment is aligned with the power standards. • The assessment is tied tightly to clearly identified learning targets within the power standards. • The assessment is written around 1-3 of the most important learning targets. • The assessment tasks are tied to the Proficiency Level Descriptions (PLDs). • The assessment adheres to sound method and design elements (see “Test-Item Quality Checklist,” which provides guidelines for gathering reliable information about student learning). 12

  12. Proficiency Level Descriptions 4 (Advanced) – Level 3 performance, plus applications that go beyond what was explicitly taught. 3 (Proficient) – No major errors or omissions of explicitlytaught material (Webb’s DOK 3 & 4) 2 (Approaching) – No major errors or omissions of simpler material, but major errors involving complex material (Webb’s DOK 1 & 2) 1 (Emerging) – With help, partial knowledge of some of the simpler and complex details and processes 13

  13. Steps to Creating a Quality CFA 14

  14. H.H.1.1:The child will be able to get him/herself dressed in the morning to begin the school day. I can pick out appropriate clothing. I can put my clothes on. 4 – tucked in, pleated, wrinkle-free 3 – zipped up, buttoned, and/or tied 2 – clothes on, but unfastened 1 – missing one or more articles of clothing ON THEIR BODY 4 – Accessorized; BLING! 3 – clothes that are color- and pattern-coordinated and appropriate for school 2 – selected shirt, pants, and shoes 1 – missing one or more articles of clothing 15

  15. EXAMINING COMMON FORMATIVE ASSESSMENTS • Individually (or in your school teams) examine CFAs from your staff. • Based on the PLDs for the Quality Indicators, how does your assessment change? • Be prepared to share. 5 minutes 17

  16. Workshop 2: Debrief • How can creating PLDs help in the creation of quality CFAs? • How can the use of PLDs impact student achievement? • How can PLDs help you in your PLC leadership work with teachers? 18

  17. Next Steps • At your building, what might be some effective ways to approach implementation of • Quality indicators of CFAs • Proficiency Level Descriptions? • Because teams are in such different places, what might be some alternatives to a large group presentation? 19

  18. Future Work Next Steps: • Next Principals’ Student Achievement Meeting—Bring examples of strong and weak CFAs. Be prepared to share ways you’ve worked with your staff to strengthen CFA design. Future Work: • Deploying (using) CFAs effectively • Displaying and using data to create a quality response to CFAs • Integrating an assessment plan into an instructional unit 20

More Related