1 / 47

Diffusion in Earth’s Deep Interior: Insights from High-Pressure Experiments

Diffusion in Earth’s Deep Interior: Insights from High-Pressure Experiments. Jim Van Orman Department of Geological Sciences Case Western Reserve University. CO nsortium for M aterials P roperties R esearch in E arth S ciences.

vangie
Download Presentation

Diffusion in Earth’s Deep Interior: Insights from High-Pressure Experiments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Diffusion in Earth’s Deep Interior: Insights from High-Pressure Experiments Jim Van Orman Department of Geological Sciences Case Western Reserve University

  2. COnsortium for Materials Properties Research in Earth Sciences COMPRES is an NSF-supported consortium that supportsstudy of Earth material properties, particularly at high pressures and temperatures (Earth interior conditions).

  3. Interior of the Earth The crust and upper mantle are composed of the familiar silicate minerals. In the deep mantle, these transform to denser high-pressure forms.

  4. Mantle Mineralogy

  5. To study these and other materials, COMPRES supports user facilities, including several synchrotron X-ray facilities where high-pressure experiments are performed. Advanced Photon Source

  6. Synchrotron facilities also house very large presses that allow study of somewhat larger samples. Mounted on a stage that can move the press with micron precision to put the sample at the focal point of the X-ray beam.

  7. Mafic melt viscosity experiment by Lara Brown, Chip Lesher, et al., UC-Davis

  8. Diffusion in Earth’s Deep Interior: Insights from High-Pressure Experiments What is Diffusion? Diffusion is the transport of matter by random hopping of atoms. It is a fundamental step in many important chemical and physical processes. http://www.johnkyrk.com/diffusion.html

  9. Atoms initially confined to a plane spread out with time according to a simple mathematical law, based on the theory of a random walk. How rapidly they spread depends on the diffusion coefficient. Diffusion is *much* more rapid in gases and liquids than in minerals.

  10. How can diffusion happen in a crystal? Gas Crystal

  11. In a perfect crystal, diffusion is extremely difficult But crystals are never perfect... dislocations grain boundaries

  12. Diffusion by a vacancy mechanism More vacancies = faster diffusion Vacancies move much faster than the atoms themselves

  13. Diffusion in the Deep Earth (1):Maintaining a Heterogeneous Mantle Convective and diffusive mixing Subduction makes the mantle chemically heterogeneous On what length scales can the heterogeneity be preserved?

  14. Diffusion in the Deep Earth (2):Chemical Transfer at the Core-Mantle Boundary

  15. Diffusion in the Deep Earth (3):Diffusion and Viscosity diffusion coefficient viscosity Stokes-Einstein Equation

  16. Diffusion in Deep Earth Materials at High Pressure1. Solid Iron-Nickel Alloys (Inner Core) 2. MgO (Lower Mantle)What are the fundamental controls on the diffusion rates?

  17. High-Pressure Experiments Pressure = Force/Area

  18. Multi-Anvil Press Sample size ~1 mm

  19. 1. Diffusion in Iron-Nickel Alloys at High Pressure Fe Ni

  20. Homologous Temperature Scaling For Close-Packed Metals Inner Core Does it hold at high pressure?

  21. Fe-Ni Diffusion Profiles12 GPa, 1600 oC Yunker and Van Orman, 2007 Boltzmann-Matano

  22. DFe-Ni vs Composition Melting curve 1 atmosphere Yunker and Van Orman, 2007 12 GPa 1600 oC 2 hr

  23. DFe-Ni vs Pressure at Constant Homologous Temperature Yunker and Van Orman, 2007

  24. logDFe-Ni vs Pressure Yunker and Van Orman, 2007

  25. logDFe-Ni vs Pressure Yunker and Van Orman, 2007

  26. logDFe-Ni vs Pressure Yunker and Van Orman, 2007

  27. Inner core viscosity (Harper-Dorn creep regime) ~1011 - 1012 Pa s Suggests that inner core behaves like a fluid on the timescale of Earth rotation, and is free to super-rotate instead of being gravitationally locked to the mantle. Inner core anisotropy an active deformation feature, rather than growth texture?

  28. 2. Diffusion in MgO (Mg,Fe)O is thought to represent ~15-20% of the lower mantle.

  29. Prior Studies of Self-Diffusion in MgO (Atmospheric Pressure) Mg O Van Orman and Crispin, in press, Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry

  30. Diffusion in MgO at High Pressure Sample retrieved from experiment at 2000 oC and 25 GPa Experiments were designed to measure lattice and grain boundary diffusion of both Mg and O 25Mg, 18O enriched Van Orman et al., 2003

  31. Van Orman et al., 2003

  32. Ab Initio Calculation

  33. Cation diffusion in MgO is predicted to become slower with increasing depth in the lower mantle (except just above the core-mantle boundary).

  34. A surprise: Al3+ diffuses rapidly in MgO MgO polyxtl MgO xtl Al2O3 Van Orman et al., 2003

  35. Al3+ impurities in MgO: Cation vacancies are created to maintain electrical neutrality. These are attracted to Al3+and tend to form pairs (and higher order clusters at low temperature). These defect associates have been known about for decades, but their influence on diffusion has been largely neglected. Al-vacancy pairs enhance the mobility of Al, butdiminish the mobility of the vacancy (and thus the mobility of other cations that diffuse using vacancies).

  36. Diffusion experiments to determine Al-vacancy binding energy and pair diffusivity 1 atm to 25 GPa 1577 to 2273 K Spinel MgAl2O4 MgO E-probe scan Van Orman et al., 2009

  37. Van Orman et al., 2009 Diffusion profiles were fit to a theoretical model to determine binding energy and diffusivity of the Al-vacancy pairs. Binding energies for all experiments at atmospheric pressure are -50 ± 10 kJ/mol (2s), consistent with theoretical values of -48 to -53 kJ/mol (Carroll et al., 1988) and have no clear pressure dependence.

  38. V = 3.22 cm3/mol (+/- 0.25) However… The diffusion coefficient of the Al-vacancy pair does depend on pressure. Similar to pressure dependence for Mg self-diffusion (3.0 cm3/mol) Van Orman et al., 2009

  39. What about other trivalent cations? Crispin and Van Orman, 2010 Al (0.535 Å)

  40. Diffusivity and Ionic Radius Crispin and Van Orman, 2010 Sc

  41. Why is chromium so slow? Crystal field effect • Cr3+ 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d3

  42. The crystal field effect seems to explain differences in the diffusivity of other transition metals. • Fe2+ 6 d electrons • 3 t2g, 2 eg, 1 t2g • Co2+ 7 d electrons • 3 t2g, 2 eg, 2 t2g • Ni2+ 8 d electrons • 3 t2g, 2 eg, 3 t2g (Similar to Cr3+) Wuensch and Vasilos, 1962

  43. Crispin and Van Orman, 2010

  44. A transition in the electronic structure of Fe2+ in MgO is one of the exciting discoveries in mineral physics in the last decade (Badro et al., 2003). Marquardt et al. (2009) Science • At high pressure, the two electrons in eg orbitals in Fe2+ move to t2g orbitals. • This so-called “spin” transition affects a wide range of properties (density, seismic wave speeds). • It may also have a strong influence on diffusion.

  45. Crispin and Van Orman, 2010

  46. Conclusion:How might electronic spin transitions affect diffusion length scales in the mantle? Low Spin? • Spin transitions may slow the diffusion of transition metals significantly. This would: • Make chemical exchange across the core-mantle boundary more difficult. • Make chemical heterogeneity in the deepest mantle more difficult to erase. High Spin

More Related