300 likes | 399 Views
Learn about approaches and success assessment in island eradication efforts, key relationships, the importance of detection probability, and methods to determine success. Discover how to establish relationships between detection and effort, actively search for survivors, and collect data for a thorough assessment. Explore models, surveys, and the significance of quantifying success probability for effective management and early identification of failures.
E N D
Island eradications: Approaches and assessment of success Biodiversity Bonanza Dean Anderson Landcare Research
Central question: How can we determine whether an eradication effort has been successful?
Answer is important: • Influence management practice • Funders want to know outcome • If fail, want to know sooner rather than later.
Assessing success • Establish relationship between search effort and probability of detection. • Actively search for survivors • Collect spatial and temporal data on search effort
Key relationship 1 Probability of detection 0 Search effort
Probability of detection and success 1 Probability of eradication success Probability of detection 0 Search effort
Probability of detection and success 1 Threshold Probability of eradication success Probability of detection 0 Search effort
Probability of detection and success 1 Probability of eradication success Probability of detection 0 Search effort
How do we get this “key” relationship? 1 Probability of detection Depends on eradication method 0 Search effort
Carcasses collected Pigs on Santa Cruz Island, USA - (Ramsey et al. 2009) • Goats on Guadalupe Island, Mexico • Luciana Luna, Conservacion de Islas Stoats on Resolution Island, NZ DOC
Catch – effort model:(knock-down phase) Helicopter Ground Helicopter Goats dispatched Helicopter Hunting hours
Probability of detection and success 1 Probability of eradication success Probability of detection 0 Search effort
2 Approaches when missing carcasses • Wait and see • Easy • Takes time • If fail, the problem is big • Actively search • Requires data and statistics • If fail, survivors may be very localised
Mexico Gulf of Mexico Isabel 82 ha PacificOcean AraceliSamaniegoConservacion de Islas
Isabel Island, Mexico • 1 toxin drop • 3 annual wax-tag surveys • No rats detected
Eradication success??? Spatial-detection Model • Home range size • Detection probability of tags
Wax-tag survey year 2 Spatial-detection Model • Home range size • Detection probability of tags • Population growth rate • Dispersal kernel
Repeat 1000 times Each female takes on slightly different parameter values
Results * Confidence intervals reflect the uncertainty in input parameters
Results * Confidence intervals reflect the uncertainty in input parameters
One – survey approach 50-m spacing
Summary • Why quantify probability of success? • Management • Funders • Identify failure early
Summary Carcasses counted • Catch – effort model • Collect data during “knock-down” phase • Establish relationship between detection & effort
Summary Carcasses not available • Spatial – detection model • Estimate parameters with experiments or literature • Homerange size • Detection probability of device • Reproductive rates • Dispersal kernels • Incorporate uncertainty
Summary • Requires biological understanding and statistics • Arguably better than “wait-and-see”
Acknowledgements • John Parkes • AraceliSamaniego • Luciana Luna • Conservacion de Islas, Mexico • Department of Conservation, NZ