1 / 31

Peers and Learning A Solution to the “Teacher Bandwidth” Problem

Peers and Learning A Solution to the “Teacher Bandwidth” Problem. David Wiley, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Instructional Technology Utah State University. Overview. Assumptions Affordances Alternatives Another assumption Ants & bees. The 1:1 Assumption.

valora
Download Presentation

Peers and Learning A Solution to the “Teacher Bandwidth” Problem

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Peers and LearningA Solution to the “Teacher Bandwidth” Problem David Wiley, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Instructional Technology Utah State University

  2. Overview • Assumptions • Affordances • Alternatives • Another assumption • Ants & bees

  3. The 1:1 Assumption • All other things being equal, the optimal student to teacher ratio is one-to-one • Assumption + distance education?

  4. “The dilemma presented by individually tailored instruction is that it combines an instructional imperative with an economic impossibility. With few exceptions, one instructor for every student, despite its advantages, is not affordable. Instructional technology promises to provide most of the advantages of individualized instruction at affordable cost while maintaining consistent, measurable, high-quality content.” -ADL / SCORM

  5. Inside the Assumption • “The dilemma presented by individually tailored instruction is that it combines an instructional imperative with an economic impossibility. With few exceptions, one instructor for every student, despite its advantages, is not affordable.” • Individually tailored instruction requires 1:1

  6. Roots of Automation • Move “tried and true” methods online • Assumption of 1:1 moves online as well • 1:1 requires massive number of teachers • Teachers are expensive • Use an automated system

  7. Environmental Affordances • Control the way we • Plan • Act • Evaluate • Do virtually everything

  8. ID Methods/Strategies Genesis • One room schoolhouse / classroom • 20 to 30 students • Physical proximity • Conversation, body language • Shared artifacts and workspaces • Intimate relationships • Etc.

  9. What would you do if… • You could read the mind of your boss? • You could run 45 mph for any distance without tiring? • A religious following of 1,000s suddenly dedicated themselves to worshipping you?

  10. Future Planning • Why haven’t you ever seriously considered the effects of these changes? • Would success in the old environment be a reliable predictor of success in the new? • Would you continue planning the same after the changes occurred?

  11. ID Methods/Strategies Exodus • The Network • 10s of 1,000s of students • Physical separation • New modes of real-time conversation and new non-verbal cues • New ways of sharing workspaces and artifacts • Generally casual relationships

  12. More Changes • Why haven’t we ever considered instructional methods for 10,000 students? • If small number methods fail with very large numbers, could large number methods not fail with small numbers? • We have no 25,000 student methods because we’ve never had reason or environment to support their discovery

  13. Still Tried and True? • “Tried and true” methods are only so F2F • Strategic success in F2F settings is not necessarily a predictor of success in online settings • What would a new method look like?

  14. Another Assumption • ITI requires 1:1 because students are unqualified to provide learning support to each other • “If any student knew enough about the course content to provide learning support to another, they wouldn’t be a student”

  15. Collaboration? • If no one student is incapable, what about a group? • Group ignorance is worse than individual • Based on the little bit individuals might know, groups would have to be unmanageably large

  16. Potential Collaborators For F2F courses sizes 9 - 1900

  17. New Affordances

  18. More New Affordances

  19. Low Tech Examples • http://slashdot.org/ • http://kuro5hin.org/ • http://perlmonks.org/

  20. They both fall in the ditch • “What is it that governs here? What is it that issues orders, foresees the future, elaborates plans, and preserves equilibrium?” • Maeterlinck (1927)

  21. The Ants Do It, The Bees Do It • Social insects self-organize without central leadership, planning, or coordination • Food gathering • Food storage • Food delivery • Nest / hive building • Nest / hive defense • Cemetery, garbage dump, etc.

  22. Even People Do It • Pre-zoning Committee Cities • Residential districts • Commercial districts • Specialty areas • Slums • Economics / markets • Communities • Organizations

  23. Instructional Design Theory? • Goals: Provide on-going learning support, scale to extremely large numbers of students, provide rich human contact • Values: Human interaction, problem-solving, authenticity

  24. Instructional Design Theory? • Methods: Problem-centering, decentralization (teacher as super-peer), collaboration, reusable (digital) educational materials, network • Preconditions: Massive number of learners, some existing knowledge, positive attitudes toward collaboration and power-sharing

  25. Disdain for Pure Design • And don't EVER make the mistake [of thinking] that you can design something better than what you get from ruthless massively parallel trial-and-error with a feedback cycle. That's giving your intelligence _much_ too much credit. • Linus Torvalds e-mail dated 12-04-01

  26. Grounded Research • Examine functioning, large, online learning communities • Ask Slashdot • PERL Monks • Newsgroups (programming) • Grounded theory development (ala Strauss & Corbin)

  27. Conclusion • Solve the teacher bandwidth problem by • Removing the teacher. • Replace the teacher with massive access to peer expertise, resources, and archived materials (conversations and artificial curricular materials)

  28. Conclusion • Right for every circumstance? • NO! • Right for a large variety of circumstances? • YES!

  29. In education, the power of peer-to-peer comes from connecting learners, not machines.

  30. David Wiley, Ph.D. http://wiley.ed.usu.edu/ david.wiley@usu.edu

More Related