1 / 6

PSAAP Management

Bob Voigt for the AST. PSAAP Management. Topics. AST CRT TST Peer Reviews. AST (Alliance Strategy Team). Responsible for the management of PSAAP Reports to the ASC Execs Members Thuc Hoang, HQ Dick Watson, LLNL Nels Hoffman, LANL Paul Yarrington, SNL Bob Voigt, SAIC

valentine-raymond
Download Presentation

PSAAP Management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Bob Voigt for the AST PSAAP Management

  2. Topics • AST • CRT • TST • Peer Reviews

  3. AST (Alliance Strategy Team) • Responsible for the management of PSAAP • Reports to the ASC Execs • Members • Thuc Hoang, HQ • Dick Watson, LLNL • Nels Hoffman, LANL • Paul Yarrington, SNL • Bob Voigt, SAIC • Tina Macaluso, SAIC

  4. TST (TriLab Sponsor Teams) • One for each Center with two members from each Lab • Primary contact between Center and Labs • Meet with Center at least once annually • Not a formal review • Informal exchange • Resource for facilitating all types of interchanges with the Labs, e.g. • People • Data

  5. Fall Peer Review • Panel of 7 reviewers for each Center • 4, including the Chair, from non-DP organizations • 3 not already on TST/AST for Center from DP Labs • Application • V&V, UQ • Software • Two day review resulting in report to Center and ASC Execs • Designed to strengthen the Centers

  6. Fall Peer Review • TST and AST in attendance, but not formally part of the review • Consistent agenda across all Centers • Details worked out jointly with each Center • Centers asked to provide list of prospective reviewers for consideration

More Related