1 / 27

Transportation Fund

Transportation Fund. City Council Budget Study Session June 1, 2011 (content previously provided for the September 21, 2010 Transportation Fund Study Session). Overview. Prop A & C Local Return below historic levels

tyme
Download Presentation

Transportation Fund

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Transportation Fund City Council Budget Study Session June 1, 2011 (content previously provided for the September 21, 2010 Transportation Fund Study Session)

  2. Overview • Prop A & C Local Return below historic levels • Annual transit sales tax revenue compared to budgeted was ($724,187) in FY 2008-09, ($1,378,063) in FY 2009-10; and is anticipated to be ($455,029) in FY 2010-11. • Cost increases due to: • Service contracts and fuel costs • New cost allocation program added $444,697 in FY 2009-10, and $785,804 in FY2010-11. • Eliminate less efficient service without abandoning core riders • Service demand remains high on 6 of the 9 routes • Enhance Revenue • Beeline and Dial-A-Ride Fare Increase • Maintain commitment to transit infrastructure • Transit program is dependent on Federal grants that require local match for bus purchases and maintenance facility construction.

  3. Transit Network inGlendale Area

  4. ResidentialTransitOrientation Based on • Low income • 0-vehicle households • % youth • % elderly • Residential density

  5. Beeline 2008 Boardings per Revenue Hour Source: Ridecheck Data, November 2008

  6. Fund Balancing Recommendation from Traffic & Transportation Commission

  7. Deficit Is ForecastIf Status Quo Is Maintained 5-year Gap = 17.2M

  8. Fund Balancing Recommendations

  9. Proposed Fares

  10. Fund Balancing Recommendations

  11. Route 3Glendale / Verdugo/ Foothill 3,710 Weekday Riders 46.0 Weekday Pax/Hour $1.66 Cost per Pax Trip First AM Trip: 26 Pax Last PM Trip: 15 Pax 51% Downtown - GCC 10% GCC - Montrose 39% Montrose – JPL

  12. Route 13Glenoaks Canyonto Downtown 41 Weekday Riders 13.4 Weekday Pax/Hour $5.68 Cost per Pax Trip 2 Pax GAMC-Canyon 15 Pax Canyon-GAMC

  13. Route 13 - “Glenoaks Canyon Special Service”

  14. Fund Balancing Recommendations

  15. Route 12GTC to BRITC 368 Weekday Riders 15.9 Weekday Pax/Hour $4.81 Cost per Pax Trip

  16. Route 12 Other Options for Consideration • Station car or station vanpool provided from existing employer fleet • Station car or station vanpool formed by passengers • Metro 94 / 794 - 12-30 minute service along San Fernando Road

  17. Fund Balancing Recommendations

  18. Fund Balancing Recommendations

  19. FY 2011-12 Revenue Budget

  20. FY 2011-12 Expenditure Budget

  21. Results of Fund Balancing Options • Efficient Core Service Level For Beeline And Dial-A-Ride • Beeline Bus Fleet With Average Age Of 7 Years (Bus Life =12 Years) • Appropriate Maintenance & Operations Facility For Beeline And Dial-A-Ride • Potential To Sell Transit Services to Burbank as part of the Tri-city cost savings efforts.

  22. Transportation Fund

  23. Reference Slides

  24. Los Angeles County Fixed Route Fares

  25. Los Angeles County Dial-A-Ride Fares

  26. Other Service Reduction Options

  27. Proposed Service Changes

More Related