1 / 19

Forest Practices Code Transition

Forest Practices Code Transition. Larry Pedersen Chief Forester, MOF. Agenda. Background History of Transitional FPC Why change now? Principles for change What is changing? Role of Professionals Impact on the BCFS Rising to the challenge. Introduction. Amendments to the FPC.

trinh
Download Presentation

Forest Practices Code Transition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Forest Practices CodeTransition Larry Pedersen Chief Forester, MOF

  2. Agenda • Background • History of Transitional FPC • Why change now? • Principles for change • What is changing? • Role of Professionals • Impact on the BCFS • Rising to the challenge

  3. Introduction Amendments to the FPC • Amendments to the current Forest Practices Code are effective this month • First step toward FRPA: • in Spring 2003 • Excellent foundation for FRPA: • Dedication and hard work of government, industry, auditors and public watchdogs • High standards in forest practices in BC • Today’s discussion: • Amendments to the FPC(December 2002 to April 2005)

  4. Background • Forest Practices Code: • Became law in 1995 • Governed planning & forest practices • Consolidated policies and practices across province into legal framework • Increased level of protection for environmental values • Increased public participation • Increased emphasis on planning

  5. Strengths of the FPC • More equitable treatmentof licensees • Standards transparent to all • Increased public credibility • Based on current scientific knowledge/thinking

  6. Weaknesses of the FPC • Complexity • Lack of incentives • Industry’s inability to respond rapidly to market opportunities • Impact on harvesting costs • Key environmental provisions still not delivered (e.g. landscape level planning)

  7. History of the Transitional FPC 1998 1999 2000 2001 1997 KPMG Study on Costs Bill 47 Cost Driver Initiative Code Review Committee Review other policy frameworks Code Pilots

  8. History of Transitional FPC May 1st, 2002 July 25th , 2002 Nov. 4th, 2002 Discussion Paper Developed Mid Dec. 2002 Consultation Process Public Input Forest Statutes Amendment Act Drafted Discussion Paper Released, Consultation Begins 1st, 2nd and 3rdReading Dr. Hoberg releases report recommendations FSAA introducedto the house FSAA passed intoLaw

  9. Transitional FPC • December 2002 to April 2005 • Amendments to FPC • Transitional legislation • Takes effect this month • Provides transactional relief • Licensees move to FRPA by replacing FDP with FSP between April ‘03- April ’05 • FRPA Regulations to follow early next year

  10. Why Change Now? • Move immediately in the direction of FRPA • Reduce costs and complexity • Ensure delivery is within the changing resource capacity of government • Introduce new efficiencies for industry by providing “freedom to manage” for results • Can continue to balance social, environmental and economic interests in FPC framework

  11. Principles • Must allow for innovation and creativity • Must limit constraints of law to where absolutely required to meet public interests - i.e don’t over-regulate or constrain freedoms with law • Legislative standards must be clear, precise and succinct • Must be enforceable • Must achieve an equivalent level of environmental stewardship

  12. Major Changes to FPC • Government will not approve site plans and minor amendments to FDPs • All FDPs currently in effect are extended to April 2005 • Forest companies must meet new standards for all new site-level plans • Minor changes to approved plans must not affect intent of plan or other stakeholders • Results of site plans and minor amendments subject to C&E

  13. What Has Not Changed? • Compliance and Enforcement: • Administrative remedies will remain • Forest Practices Board’s role will remain • Forest Development Plans maintained • Continue to manage and protect all forest resources

  14. Amended Code and Professionals • Amended Code increases the reliance on resource professionals • Amended Code is not the right instrument for regulating professional conduct • Legislation governing resource professionals is being modernized

  15. Amended Code and Professionals - Continued • Which professionals to use? • Look to the FPC and Professional Acts • Signing and Sealing • Either specified in FPC (e.g. sign off during transition) or, • Look to Professional Acts and Bylaws • Role of Resource Management Professionals • See Companion Document 5 http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/code/#act

  16. What is the Impact on BCFS? • Changing roles and responsibilities • Compliance and Enforcement: • Continued and more focused role in protection and conservation of forest and range values • Effectiveness Evaluations: • Continued evaluation of outcomes against stated objectives in new Code • Increased science based assessments

  17. Rising to the Challenge • Letting go of traditional approaches • Accepting new roles • Monitoring trends and outcomes • Respond as needed • Keep implementation decisions simple and make it work

  18. Summary • Framework deliverable with changing staffing levels in government • Changes provide for early implementation of some of the features of FRPA • FRPA regulation work is ongoing and decisions on direction are not yet final • Solid foundation for moving ahead through the transition period

  19. End of Overview Presentation withLarry Pedersen

More Related