1 / 13

HSE response to occupational health concerns raised re: Hanson Cement employees

This report answers specific questions raised by the local community regarding occupational health concerns at Hanson Cement. It provides information and the HSE opinion based on various sources of data, showing that the risks from exposure to hazardous substances are generally well controlled at the Padeswood site. Further investigation is not warranted at this time.

treyes
Download Presentation

HSE response to occupational health concerns raised re: Hanson Cement employees

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. HSE response to occupational health concerns raised re: Hanson Cement employees Jane Lassey HM Inspector of Health & Safety Head of Operations Wales

  2. Purpose of HSE report • to answer the three specific questions raised by the local community that relate to occupational health • to provide information and HSE opinion to the Investigation Response Team • to set the work of HSE in context

  3. HSE in context • national independent regulator for work-related health, safety and illness • independent prosecuting authority that takes action against those who put workers at risk of death, illness or injury • Powers include Improvement & Prohibition Notices and prosecution • concentrate our work where the risks are likely to be highest

  4. Three concerns raised? • Are there Occupational Health exposures of concern with specific reference to dusts and asbestos exposures? • Are there increased cancers in employees / former employees? • Can health surveillance records be made available for consideration?

  5. Sources of information • Info on H&S performance on site • Site inspection – Oct 2010 • Review of all HSE historical records • Statutory reports to HSE • Company Occupational Health Records • Health Surveillance data • Air monitoring records • Pension records • Inspection history

  6. Control of Substances Hazardous to Health – what does the law expect? Prevent or adequately control exposure in workplace COSHH - hierarchy • Elimination • Substitution • Engineering controls/systems of work • Control exposure at source e.g. ventilation • Personal Protective Equipment • Air Monitoring/Health Surveillance

  7. Are there Occupational Health exposures of concern with specific reference to dusts and asbestos exposures? Hanson Cement • Process containment • Segregation of employees from task • RPE/Protective clothing • Regular air monitoring/sampling • Health Surveillance • Occupational Health Advisor

  8. Are there Occupational Health exposures of concern with specific reference to dusts and asbestos exposures? • Control options chosen by the company appear to be inherently reliable and effective • HSE not concerned about exposures to dust or asbestos • Company are complying with what the law requires

  9. Are there increased cancers in employees / former employees? • Occ Health Physician from 1999 • Exit medicals • Claims • Pensions data • (5 cases out of 63 deaths) • No cancer cases attributed to work at plant • Caution

  10. Can health surveillance records be made available for consideration? • Confidentiality • HSE Occ Health Inspector review • Review of Health surveillance records • Review of Occ Health Provision • No referrals/no occ health concerns • Occ Health provision exemplar • No RIDDOR reports to HSE

  11. Key conclusions • Evidence indicates that the risks from exposure to hazardous substances are generally well controlled at the Padeswood site • Occupational health provision exceeds current legislative requirements • cannot rule out contribution of past exposures to subsequent development of disease in the workforce • No raised levels of cancers in work force

  12. Recommendation • further investigation of occupational health issues are not warranted However • If manufacturing process changes the company would need to re-assess any consequent risks to the health of the workforce and • consider different or additional controls

  13. Any Questions? • HSE website - www.hse.gov.uk

More Related