1 / 86

NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER FLOW AROUND AN AIRFOIL

NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER FLOW AROUND AN AIRFOIL. By: Saurabh Deshpande & Abbas Electricwala Guided by: Prof. Mitesh Vegad & Mr. Sankalp Kulkarni. AIM OF PROJECT. The aim of the project is: To study the behavior of an airfoil at low Reynolds number.

trevor
Download Presentation

NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER FLOW AROUND AN AIRFOIL

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER FLOW AROUND AN AIRFOIL By: Saurabh Deshpande & Abbas Electricwala Guided by: Prof. Mitesh Vegad & Mr. Sankalp Kulkarni

  2. AIM OF PROJECT • The aim of the project is: • To study the behavior of an airfoil at low Reynolds number. • To understand the reasons behind the drop in performance. • To study and verify the effect of “leading edge slot” in the airfoil as a result of which performance of the airfoil increases.

  3. THEORY • Flow over bodies: Fluid LIFT V DRAG

  4. THEORY • Boundary layer:

  5. THEORY • Effect of boundary layer on lift and drag: • Effective shape of airfoil changes, hence pressure drag increases and lift decreases. • Boundary layer increases fluid friction, hence shear drag increases.

  6. THEORY • Reynolds number: • Re = Inertia force / Viscous force = ρVL/µ • Re > 105: Flow is generally turbulent • Re < 105: Flow is generally laminar

  7. THEORY • What happens at High Reynolds number? • Flow is turbulent hence Boundary layer thickness is small. • Therefore airfoil profile shape remains almost unaltered giving less pressure drag and high lift. • But, due to high velocities fluid friction at wall increases and shear drag increases.

  8. THEORY • What happens at Low Reynolds number? • Flow is laminar hence Boundary layer thickness is more. • Therefore airfoil profile shape alters giving rise to higher pressure drag and low lift. • But flow velocities are very low hence shear drag is also really low.

  9. THEORY • Flow separation • Adverse pressure gradient • Low inertia force (i.e. low Re)

  10. THEORY • Effect of flow separation on lift and drag: • Separation occurs suddenly which gives rise to drastic decrease in lift and increase in pressure drag. • This phenomenon is called stalling.

  11. PROJECT USEFULNESS • From the discussion we can see that it is difficult to obtain desired performance from airfoils at low Reynolds number. • Application of low Reynolds number regime? • Micro air vehicles (MAV) • Near space applications • Wind turbines • Low speed takeoff and landing of aircrafts

  12. THEORY • Boundary Layer Control: • Suction over airfoil surface • Blowing of air over airfoil surface • Vortex creator • Trailing edge flap • Leading edge slat • Leading edge slot

  13. LEADING EDGE SLOT

  14. PROJECT PLAN • Analysis of un-slotted airfoil at low Reynolds number using: • Numerical investigation- use of commercial CFD package • Experimental investigation- Wind tunnel testing • Followed by analysis of the same airfoil applying a Boundary layer control technique called leading edge slot: • Numerical investigation- use of commercial CFD package

  15. UN-SLOTTED AIRFOIL

  16. SELECTION OF AIRFOIL • NACA 4 series airfoil profile • Selection of chord length • For air as the fluid, ρ= 1.225 Kg/m3 • μ= 1.7894 * 1e-05 Kg/(s*m) • Hence we get Re = 68458.7* V*l

  17. SELECTION OF AIRFOIL • Minimum velocity obtainable: hw = 2.5 mm haρa =hwρw Therefore ha = hw *(ρw /ρa) = 2.0408 m of air column As, ha = V2/2g We get, V= 6.32 m/s

  18. SELECTION OF AIRFOIL • Minimum chord length: • To keep the Re low chord length should be decreased. • Due to practical limitations of airfoil manufacturing chord length of 12 cm was selected. L= 0.12 m Therefore obtained Re = 5.2 * 1e+04 This Re is in the laminar flow region hence the selected chord length and dynamic head are acceptable.

  19. SELECTION OF AIRFOIL • NACA profile selected: • No camber to simplify the manufacturing process. • Greater the thickness of airfoil, greater the chances of flow separation. • Airfoil thickness equal to 15 % of chord length selected. • Resulting profile name and figure:

  20. NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION

  21. PRE PROCESSING • Characteristics of the grid: • 2-D grid • C shaped grid around airfoil • Non uniform grid with fine mesh near the airfoil • Boundary conditions: • Upstream of airfoil: Velocity inlet • Downstream of airfoil: Pressure outlet

  22. PRE PROCESSING • Mesh around an airfoil:

  23. PROCESSING • Flow conditions: • Incompressible • Laminar • Viscous (with constant viscosity) • Steady flow • No heat transfer between airfoil and fluid

  24. RESULTING EQUATIONS • Continuity equation: • Momentum conservation equations: • … x-direction • … y-direction

  25. NUMERICAL ANALYSIS • Numerical analysis was done for: • For a very low Reynolds number of 23200 and varying the angle of attack from 0, 5, 10, 15 to 20 degree. • For a Reynolds number of 52000 (to compare with experimental data) and varying the angle of attack from 0, 5, 10, 15 to 20 degree. • For angle of attack of 5 degree where Reynolds number is varied from 1e+02 to 1e+09 so that the effect of Reynolds number on lift and drag could be calculated. • For Re of 23200 at the ground level and corresponding velocity at an altitude of 10 km to check the effect of altitude on lift and drag

  26. POST PROCESSING • Force perpendicular to airfoil (Y)= • Force parallel to airfoil (X)= + • Lift (L) = X cos θ – Y sin θ • Drag (D) = X sin θ + Y cosθ • Lift co-efficient (Cl) = L / (1/2 * ρ * A * U02 ) • Drag co-efficient (Cd) = D / (1/2 * ρ * A * U02 ) • Airfoil performance indicated by: Cl/Cd

  27. RESULTS OBTAINED FOR UN-SLOTTED AIRFOIL USING NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION

  28. EFFECT OF REYNOLDS NUMBER AoA = 5 degree

  29. EFFECT OF REYNOLDS NUMBER AoA = 5 degree

  30. EFFECT OF REYNOLDS NUMBER Re= 105 AoA = 5 degree

  31. PERFORMANCE AT LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER Stall angle Re = 23200

  32. PERFORMANCE AT LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER Re = 23200

  33. PERFORMANCE AT LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER Optimum performance Re = 23200

  34. EFFECT OF BOUNDARY LAYER Re = 23200

  35. EFFECT OF BOUNDARY LAYER Re = 23200

  36. EFFECT OF ALTITUDE (V= 0.33889 m/s)

  37. EFFECT OF ALTITUDE (V= 0.33889 m/s)

  38. EFFECT OF ALTITUDE (V= 0.33889 m/s)

  39. EFFECT OF ALTITUDE (V= 0.33889 m/s) • For velocity 0.3389 m/s • At altitude 0 km from ground: Re= 23,200 • At altitude 10 km from ground: Re= 9,613 • As altitude increases, Reynolds number decreases and hence performance drops. • Cl/Cd at the optimum performance angle drops by 9.52% as altitude increases to 10 km.

  40. VELOCITY VECTOR PLOTS- 0 DEGREE AoA Re = 23200

  41. PRESSURE CONTOURS- 0 DEGREE AoA Re = 23200

  42. VELOCITY VECTOR PLOTS- 5 DEGREE AoA Re = 23200

  43. PRESSURE CONTOURS- 5 DEGREE AoA Re = 23200

  44. VELOCITY VECTOR PLOTS- 20 DEGREE AoA Point of flow separation Re = 23200

  45. PRESSURE CONTOURS- 20 DEGREE AoA Wake region Re = 23200

  46. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION

  47. PURPOSE OF EXPERIMENTATION • To verify the results obtained by the numerical investigation • Verification has been done by comparing the graphs of “Cl/CdvsAoA” obtained by numerical and experimental investigation.

  48. EXPERIMENTATION OVERVIEW • To calculate lift and drag forces, pressure distribution around an airfoil needs to known. • This can be achieved by providing pressure taps on the surface of an airfoil and connecting them with the pitot tube. • The airfoil should be hollow to accommodate the pressure taps.

  49. FABRICATION OF AIRFOIL • Manufactured in college workshop • Design considerations: • 3 wooden sections joined by iron rods to form the frame. • Plastic sheet used to cover the frame. • Pressure taps provided to measure static pressure distribution around airfoil.

  50. FABRICATION OF AIRFOIL • AutoCAD drawings of three wooden sections • Mid section: • Side section with hollow pin: • Side section with the threaded bolt:

More Related