1 / 12

2-Sample T-Tests

2-Sample T-Tests. Independent t-test Dependent t-test Picking the correct test. Overview. z-tests with distributions; z-tests with sample means t-tests with sample means New Stuff t-tests with two independent samples e.g., Boys vs. Girls on reading ability test “Independent t-test”

toril
Download Presentation

2-Sample T-Tests

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2-Sample T-Tests Independent t-test Dependent t-test Picking the correct test

  2. Overview • z-tests with distributions; z-tests with sample means • t-tests with sample means • New Stuff • t-tests with two independent samples • e.g., Boys vs. Girls on reading ability test • “Independent t-test” • t-tests with two dependent samples • e.g., Hipness level Before and After “Queer Eye for a Straight Guy” • “Dependent t-test” • Later on: ANOVAs – 3+ samples Unit 2: z, t, hyp, 2t

  3. Ind. t-test: 2 sample means • Compares two sample means: • Both σ & μ unknown – only sample info • Compare average aggression level of 20 kids that play violent computer games to 20 kids that don’t. • Study impact of peer pressure on eating disorders. Compare average weight of sorority women vs. non-sorority women. Unit 2: z, t, hyp, 2t

  4. Ind. t-test: Ho • What do we expect if there’s no treatment effect? What would Ho be? • If video games don’t affect aggression…. • μv. games = μno games • μv. games - μno games = 0 [Expect diff. bet means to equal zero] • With sorority study • μv. sorority = μnon-sorority • μv. sorority - μnon-sorority = 0 • So, we define the Ho as μ1 – μ2 = 0 • Sampling distribution centered on this • some observed differences bigger • some observed differences smaller Unit 2: z, t, hyp, 2t

  5. Indep t-test: formula Actual difference observed. (For our purposes, always zero) • Standard Error of the Difference (between the means) • difference expected between sample means • how much we expect the sample means to differ purely by chance Unit 2: z, t, hyp, 2t

  6. Sampling Distribution of the Difference Between Means Unit 2: z, t, hyp, 2t

  7. Ind. t-test: Example Unit 2: z, t, hyp, 2t

  8. Ind. t-test: Example Unit 2: z, t, hyp, 2t

  9. Hypothesis Testing Steps (Ind. t) 1. Comparing xbar1and xbar2, μ and σ unknown. 2. H0: μ1 – μ2 = 0; HA: μ1 – μ2 ≠ 0 • α = .05, df = n1+n2–2 = 5 + 5 - 2 = 8 tcritical =  2.306 4. tobtained = -1.947 5. RETAIN the H0 . • The research hypothesis was not supported. The weight of women in sororities (M=111) does not differ significantly from that of other women (M=127), t(8)= -1.947, n.s.. (not needed if using SPSS) Unit 2: z, t, hyp, 2t

  10. Effect Size (Ind. t) • Since we retained the Ho, we don’t need an effect size statistics. However, if we did, it would work like this… • first calculate ŝ (standard deviation of all the scores combined)… • then d… number in one group Unit 2: z, t, hyp, 2t

  11. Dependent T-test • 2 samples • two groups are matched in some way (e.g., pairs of twins are divided between two groups) • typically the same people are in both groups (e.g., before & after design) • Example: The North American Bacon Council tests if participants change weight after 6 months of an all bacon diet. • IV: Diet (normal, all-bacon); DV: Weight • Standard Error of the Mean Difference Unit 2: z, t, hyp, 2t

  12. Hypothesis Testing Steps (Dep. t) 1. Comparing xbar1and xbar2, μ and σ unknown. 2. H0: μD = 0 HA: μD ≠ 0 3. α = .05, df=npairs –1 = 7-1 = 6, tcritical =  2.447 • tobtained = -3.074 5. REJECT the H0 • The research hypothesis was supported. The weight of subjects before the all bacon diet (M=188.57) was significantly less than the weight after (M=203.57), t(6)= -3.074, p≤ .05. The effect of the diet on weight was large, d=1.1619. Get off SPSS print-out Unit 2: z, t, hyp, 2t

More Related