Similarities

3. Similarities • The peak of Islam’spolitical andmilitary power • All based on military conquest • All from Turkic nomadic cultures • All absolute monarchies • All ruled through Islamic Principles (Sharia, 5 pillars, Umma, Hadith) • All rose to power after Mongols • All controlled lucrative trade • All utilized Jizya on Dhimmi • Political influence of women in Harem ( seclusion of women whose son could take the throne)

4. Differences • All were Muslim but Mughals ruled over a predominantly non-Muslim population • Ottomans had large Christian minority • Safavids were Shi’ite Muslims • Mughal and Ottoman were more tolerant of women and non-Muslims • Ottomans were Sunni led • Mughal attempted to advance non-Muslims in government leadership • Mughal leading exporter of Cotton • Ottoman often at war with the “West” ( ex: Siege of Vienna, Battle of Lepanto) • Safavid was landlocked • Ottoman the only one with some naval power • Mughal not directly involved with slavery • Trade with the “West” limited by mostly by Mughal merchants ( French, English and Dutch merchants)

7. Ottoman Turks began to build power on northwest corner of the Anatolian Peninsula. • With decline of Seljuk Turks, Ottomans expanded and founded the Ottoman dynasty • 1300’s: Ottomans expanded into Balkan Peninsula Serbian defeat at Battle of Kosovo

8. Janissaries: young boys taken from the Christian population. Boys were converted to Islam and trained as elite soldiers or administrators to serve the Sultan • Ottomans defeated the Serbs at the Battle of Kosovo • Controlled the Balkan Peninsula Janissaries

9. Under the leadership of Mehmet II, the Ottomans laid siege to Constantinople • Fall of Constantinople in 1453 brought end to the Byzantine Empire • The Ottomans made the city their capital renaming it Istanbul Mehmet II enters Constantinople

10. Under rule of Sultan Selim I, the Ottomans took control of Mesopotamia, Egypt, and the Arabian Peninsula with holy cities of Mecca and Medina • Selim declared himself Caliph • Ottoman rule spread across North Africa though by 1600’s this area was semi-independent

11. Ottoman attempts to penetrate Eastern Europe were stymied by the Hungarians • Greatest threat to Europe came under rule of greatest of Ottoman rulers, Suleyman I. Under his leadership, Ottomans seized Belgrade and won victory over Hungarians and occupied the country Suleyman I

12. The Ottomans laid siege to Vienna in 1529 • Ottoman advance into western Mediterranean stopped at Lepanto in 1571 by Western coalition led by the Spanish

13. In 1600’s, the Ottomans attempted to expand into Europe again • Vienna was besieged • Combined European force pushed Ottomans out of Austria and Hungary • Ottomans would never threaten Central Europe again Siege of Vienna

14. Ottoman rule • The Ottomans copied many aspects of Byzantine political structure, especially imperial rule • A strong centralized government was established with the sultan at its head in Istanbul. • The position of sultan was hereditary- once in power, a sultan would murder all his brothers. • The private domain of the sultan was called the harem

15. The imperial bureaucracy was controlled by the sultan through his chief minister, the Grand Vizier • Most high government officials were Muslim by birth and many were chosen based on merit • The Ottomans administered their lands through local rulers called pashas • Pashas collected taxes (giving a percentage to the Ottomans) and maintained law and order

16. As Caliph, the sultan was the supreme religious leader but he delegated many duties to the Ulema, who administered the legal system and education • Islamic law applied to all Ottoman territory • The Ottomans were tolerant of non-Muslims - head tax • Non-Muslim religions were headed by an official who was responsible to the sultan

17. Women had greater freedom under the Ottomans than in other Muslim nations • Could own and inherit property, could not be forced into marriage, and were permitted to divorce Women in the Ottoman court

19. Safavids descended from Turkic tribesmen in northern Iran • Safavids – Shi’ite Muslims • 1501- Safi al-Din Ismail seized much of what is today Iran and Iraq • Ismail sent missionaries into Ottoman lands • Massacred Sunni Muslims when he conquered Baghdad in 1508 Safavid soldier

20. Selim I, the Ottoman sultan, marched against Safavids and won major victory • After more attempts by the Safavids to take Ottoman lands, the Ottomans forced the Safavid leader, Shah Abbas, to sign peace treaty Selim I

21. Safavids reached peak of power under Shah Abbas • With help of Europeans, Shah Abbas attempted to take more lands from Ottomans • Another peace treaty was signed but conflict continued for many years Shah Abbas and wine boy

22. The Safavids declined after death of Shah Abbas in 1629 • Afghan tribesmen invaded and captured the Safavid capital and forced the royal family to flee to Azerbaijan, their original homeland

23. Safavid rule comparable to the Ottomans • Safavids had vibrant middle class • Greatest area of productivity in Safavid Empire was textiles • Carpets were prized all over the world

26. Founded by Babur, descended from Tamerlane and Genghis Khan • Invaded India from Kabul and conquered Delhi • Using that city as his base, he expanded into the subcontinent Babur

27. After Babur’s death, his son, Akbar, continued the expansion until most of India was under his control • Although his empire appeared highly centralized it was in reality a collection of semi-independent states held together by the emperor • The Mughal Empire was the greatest empire in India since the Mauryans Akbar

28. Although Muslim, Akbar adopted a policy of religious tolerance • Hindus served in lesser positions in his court and even Christians were present in the form of Jesuit advisors • Akbar even took a Hindu bride

29. Local officials, called Zamindars, administered districts, taking a portion of the taxes as salary • Political stability and peace = period of growth in trade and manufacturing • Much of the trade was handled by Muslim merchants

30. The Mughal dynasty went into decline after death of Akbar • Akbar succeeded by his son, Jahangir • Under Jahangir’s reign, the nobility took more power through the intrigues of one of his Persian-born wives Jahangir

31. Her son, Shah Jahan, succeeded Jahangir • In order to secure hold on power, he had all rivals murdered • Shah Jahan’s military campaigns and corruption in court impoverished state • His son, Aurangzeb, killed brother and imprisoned Shah Jahan • Shah Jahan built Taj Mahal for deceased wife Shah Jahan

32. Aurangzeb tried to eliminate many of India’s social evils including sati • He forced Hindus to convert to Islam and forbade the construction of Hindu temples • Social unrest resulted in a number of revolts • Weakened from within, Delhi was sacked by Persians in 1739

33. The Portuguese, Dutch, British, and French all sought influence in India • War between British and French • Increasing British influence under the East India Company

34. Mughals and Hindus created a blended culture • Both Muslim and Hindu cultures restricted women • Purdah adopted by higher-class Hindus Full purdah

35. Some Hindus forcibly married Muslim women and converted them to Hinduism • Hindus converting to Islam lost all rights within the Indian family • Mughals married Hindu women and adopted Indian dress

36. Comp Theses: Islamic Gunpowder Empires From 1450-1750 both the Mughal and Ottoman Empires established large functioning bureaucracies through the establishment of religiously tolerant policies over large non-Muslim groups, both will grow wealthy due to the control over lucrative trade routes, however, predominantly Hindu Mughal will have advisors of government of many faiths while the Millet system of religious enclaves (communities) will be the closest any non-Muslims have in governmental decision-making The Ottoman and Safavid Empires 1450-1750 were both Turkic lead assaults for empire establishment after the vacuum of authority the Mongols built, both will be dominated by Islamic rule ( Sharia,5 Pillars,Hadith) but the Sunni led Ottoman will be far more tolerant than the Shiite led Safavid eventually going to war and signifying the beginning of the end for the Safavid.