1 / 6

Comparative Analysis of Healthcare Systems in Scotland and England

This exploration delves into the similarities and differences between the healthcare systems of Scotland and England. Both systems prioritize universal access, comprehensive care, and a strong primary care tradition, characterized by general practitioners acting as gatekeepers. However, they diverge significantly in their organizational structures, funding models, and integration levels. Scotland's unified boards contrast with England's purchaser-provider split and reliance on multiple funding streams. This analysis aims to identify effective improvement models while emphasizing the importance of integration for optimal patient outcomes.

sulwyn
Download Presentation

Comparative Analysis of Healthcare Systems in Scotland and England

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Scotland/ England; Similarities • Founding principles • Universal, comprehensive, free • Strong primary care tradition • GP as “gatekeeper” • UK contracts • Policy priority for long term conditions • Performance, access and patient satisfaction

  2. Scotland/ England; Differences • E – purchaser provider split S – unified Boards • E – PCTs, Hospital Trusts, Foundation Trusts, MH Trusts etc S – Unified Boards (CHPs too) • E – Practice based commissioning S – Unified Boards

  3. More differences • E – open to competition and the market S – closed to competition and the market • E – many funding streams S – few funding streams • E – more autonomous (fragmented) S – more integrated (centralised)

  4. Shifting the balance

  5. Different improvement models From LeGrand 2007

  6. Integration; the key to the interface? • Shared outcomes • Systems/ Infrastructure • Clinical/ Provider • Financial • Service delivery and patient experience • Culture and ethos

More Related