1 / 13

2007 Spencer Stuart Board Index Findings Review of S&P 500 Proxies

2007 Spencer Stuart Board Index Findings Review of S&P 500 Proxies. Spencer Stuart William B. Reeves Managing Director, Atlanta. Changing Director Profile. Board independence a reality and trend toward more independent board leadership 81% of directors are independent

tiger
Download Presentation

2007 Spencer Stuart Board Index Findings Review of S&P 500 Proxies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2007 Spencer Stuart Board Index FindingsReview of S&P 500 Proxies Spencer Stuart William B. Reeves Managing Director, Atlanta

  2. Changing Director Profile • Board independence a reality and trend toward more independent board leadership • 81% of directors are independent • On 43% of boards, CEO is the only insider, up from 31% in 2002 • 35% of boards separate the Chair and CEO roles, up from 25% in ’02 • 13% of Chairs are truly independent, up from 10% last year • 94% of boards have lead/presiding director (up from 36% in ’03) • Profile of new directors continues to shift (329 in 2007) • Fewer active CEOs – 33%; down from 41% in ’02 and 53% in ’00 • More active and retired other corporate executives (e.g., division managers and functional unit leaders) – 21% vs. 7% in ’02 • 33% are first-time public company directors • Slight increase in women – 19% vs. 16% in ’02 • More bankers and investors -10% vs. 5% in ’02 • Fewer lawyers, consultants and accountants - 5% vs. 16% in ’02

  3. Changing Director Profile, cont’d • CEO increasingly likely to be sole inside director and less likely to serve on any outside boards • CEO sole insider on 43% of boards, up from 31% in ’02 and 23% in ’98 • S&P 500 CEOs serve on 0.8 outside boards, down from 1.2 in ’02 and 2.0 in ’98 • Women directors and women CEOs at all-time high • 91% of boards have at least 1 woman director, up from 82% in ’02 • 55% of boards have 2 or more women directors and 15% have 3 or more women • 15 women serve as CEOs, up from 7 in ’02 • Minority representation not growing • For the largest 200 S&P 500 companies, minorities (including African-Americans, Hispanics and Asians) account for nearly 14% of directors, down slightly from ‘05 • 85% of these boards have at least one minority director • More companies appoint international directors • Half of the top 200 S&P 500 companies have at least one director from outside the U.S., up from 45% in ’05

  4. Trends in Governance Practices • Board size and number of meetings relatively stable • 10.8 directors on average • 8.3 board meetings/year on average, up from 7.5 in ‘02 • Mandatory retirement age more prevalent and older • More boards have a retirement age: 79% vs. 55% in ’02 • But older: 67% have age 72+ vs. 35% in ’02 • One-year board terms becoming more common • 62% of boards now have a one-year term, compared to 40% in ’02

  5. Trends in Governance Practices, cont’d • Greater disclosure of director recommendation sources • Information on sources of new director recommendations was disclosed for 57% of new appointees. • Director recommendations came from the following sources: • 61% from executive search firms • 19% from insiders (e.g., CEO, controlling shareholders) • 18% from non-management directors • More disclosure of limits on other corporate directorships • 55% of boards disclose limits on other corporate board service by their directors, up from 27% in ‘06 • 18% of boards limit other audit committee memberships for their own audit committee members, with the maximum typically set at 2 or 3. This is up from 5% in ’06

  6. Committee Trends • Committees meeting more • Boards with 11+ audit cmte mtgs: 35% vs. 1% in ‘02 • Average number of audit committee meetings is 9.5 vs. 5.0 in ’02 • Compensation committees met on average 6 times, up from 5.8 in ’05 • Nominating committees met on average 5 times, up from 4.4 in ’05 • Audit chairs less likely to be CEOs/top executives • Fewer active CEOs: 18% vs. 27% in ‘02 • More retired CEOs: 24% vs. 18% • More active/retired CFOs: 13% vs. 3% • More active/retired accountants: 10% vs. 1% • Compensation and nominating committee chairs are most often retired CEOs/top executives • CompCo chairs: 38% retired CEOs; 23% active CEOs • NomCo chairs: 25% retired CEOs; 22% active CEOs

  7. Non-Executive Chairs • 35% of boards have separated the CEO/chair roles, up from 32% in ’06 and 25% in ’02 • 13% of NECs are independent, up from 10% in ’06 • Independent NEC profile (n=60) • 73% are retired; 27% active executives • 50% are a former CEO of another company • 17% are other retired executives/CFO/COO • 10% are investors/involved in private equity • 87% were on the board before becoming the chair • Additional compensation is paid to 83% of independent NECs • Average additional compensation of $139,000

  8. Lead and Presiding Directors • 94% of boards have a lead or presiding director • More boards shifting toward lead director designation • 40% designate lead director, up from 28% • 60% designate presiding director, down from 72% in ‘04 • Fewer boards rotating presiding directors • Of boards with a presiding director, 19% rotate the role, down from 27% in ’06 • And, for those that still rotate, trend is to rotate annually instead of at every board meeting • Role most often filled by retired or active CEOs/presidents/chairs • Additional compensation is paid to 32% of lead/presiding directors • Average additional compensation of $22,600

  9. Director Compensation • New disclosure requirements bring transparency to director and top executives’ compensation • Board compensation reflects increased demands on directors • All-inclusive average total compensation is $211,000 • Stock awards - 41% • Options - 16% • Cash - 35% • Other – 8% (e.g., insurance premiums, charitable award programs) • Average cash retainer of $68,560 is up 8% from ’06 and 73% greater than $39,538 in ‘02 • Fewer boards paying meeting fees: 52% vs. 70% • But, meeting fees are higher: $2,027 vs. $1,596 • More pay equity in addition to retainer: 72% vs. 42% • Fewer pay with stock options: 42% vs. 77%

  10. Committee Compensation • Committee compensation has increased for chairs and is shifting toward retainers for members • Retainers for committee chairs more prevalent and larger • More boards pay: 88% vs. 55% • Average retainer amount has increased 74% to $10,358 from $5,968 in ‘02 • Committee meeting fees less common • Fewer boards pay, although still a majority: 54% vs. 64% in ‘02 • Average fees have increased to $1,549 from $1,191 • Committee member retainers increasing in popularity • More boards pay: 31% vs. 13% • Average retainer amount has increased to $6,468 from $4,822

  11. SSBI Supplemental Survey of Corporate Secretaries • Boards seek more women and minority directors • 73% of boards seek to bring on minorities • 70% seek to bring on women • Boards seek new skills • Financial expertise - 77% • Active CEO/COO – 68% • Retired CEO/COO – 49% • International expertise – 52% • Technology expertise – 36% • Marketing expertise – 35% • Legal expertise – 8% • HR expertise – 7% • Other (e.g., industry) – 22% • Source: 2007 Spencer Stuart Board Index Supplemental Survey. 119 corporate secretaries responding.

  12. Supplemental Survey of Corporate Secretaries, cont’d • CEO succession approach varies • 25% of boards do not have an emergency succession plan • 62% of boards include CEO succession on the agenda annually; 34% more than once a year • Primary responsibility for succession planning split between nominating committee (41%) and compensation committee (40%), although many boards now cite that multiple committees or the entire board are responsible • 53% of boards use a formal review process to assess potential successors. Of these, 44% benchmark internal candidates against external ones • 23% of boards encourage top internal candidates to take on outside public board directorships • Shareholder engagement increasingly prevalent • 37% of boards, up from 22% in ’06, report that individual directors had direct contact with shareholders • Most frequently raised topics: CEO compensation (28%), majority voting (22%), and other concerns about board composition (17%) • Source: 2007 Spencer Stuart Board Index Supplemental Survey. 119 corporate secretaries responding.

  13. Supplemental Survey of Corporate Secretaries, cont’d • Majority cite limits on outside board service • 58% of boards limit outside public board service for their CEOs. • 7% allow 0 outside boards • 34% allow 1-2 outside boards • 17% allow 3-4 outside boards • 32% of boards limit outside board service for other senior executives • 11% allow 0 outside boards • 19% allow 1-2 outside boards • 3% allow 3 outside boards • SEC disclosure requirements have impacted compensation committees • 82% of boards spent additional time discussing and reviewing executive compensation • 46% held more frequent meetings • 27% attribute compensation policy changes to the new rules • Source: 2007 Spencer Stuart Board Index Supplemental Survey. 119 corporate secretaries responding.

More Related