1 / 15

Applying Rigorous Analysis to General Education Reform

Applying Rigorous Analysis to General Education Reform. Eric Ruckh, David Sill, and Michael Palmer. BRIDGE and AQIP are central to SIUE Simultaneous processes Culture of rigor in scholarship of teaching and learning. AQIP. Higher Learning Commission of North Central Association

tieve
Download Presentation

Applying Rigorous Analysis to General Education Reform

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Applying Rigorous Analysis to General Education Reform Eric Ruckh, David Sill, and Michael Palmer

  2. BRIDGE and AQIP are central to SIUE • Simultaneous processes • Culture of rigor in scholarship of teaching and learning

  3. AQIP • Higher Learning Commission of North Central Association • Alternative process for maintaining accreditation

  4. AQIP Process Action Projects

  5. Systems Portfolio • Regularly updated—100 pages • Overview and nine categories, including: • Helping Students Learn • Understanding Students' & Stakeholders' Needs • Valuing People • Leading and Communicating • Systems appraisal every four years

  6. General Education Reform Started with the Objectives Project • 2003—AAC&U’s Greater Expectations Institute • 2004—AAC&U’s General Education Institute • 2005—BRIDGE (Baccalaureate Reform through Integrated Design of General Education)

  7. BRIDGE 2005-2007 • Phase I—Eleven design teams completed proposals by March 15, 2006 • Phase II—Three design teams (May 2006) • Distribution model • Core curriculum • Learning communities • March 29, 2007--All faculty meeting • Fall 2007—Faculty Senate action

  8. Comparison—Systems Portfolio and BRIDGE designs • Do they reflect the same culture? • What are the underlying assumptions and frameworks? • What can we learn from a rigorous analysis? • Can theory and research improve practice?

  9. Systems Portfolio

  10. Theoretical Frame Loosely from Michel Foucault Structure of a text: • Aims/Purpose • Order/Relation • Field/‘Unsaid’ Assumptions

  11. Exercise • Examine Page from Systems Portfolio • What are its aims? What relations does it establish? What are its unsaid assumptions? • Examine Page from a design proposal • What are its aims? What relations does it establish? What are its unsaid assumptions? • Comparison--Alignment • What is important or significant?

  12. Report out • What did you find? • Were there any surprises?

  13. Theoretical FrameIn Application • Aims/Purpose • Order/Relation • Field/‘Unsaid’ Assumptions • Comparison of the two texts

  14. Reflective Questions: • What are the underlying assumptions and frameworks of your institutional culture? • How do you know them? • Do your institutional projects align with your university’s culture?

More Related