1 / 22

PLANNING BACKWARDS, MOVING FORWARD: BACKWARD DESIGN IN THE IMMERSION CLASSROOM

PLANNING BACKWARDS, MOVING FORWARD: BACKWARD DESIGN IN THE IMMERSION CLASSROOM. Maria Teresa de la Torre Aranda.

thu
Download Presentation

PLANNING BACKWARDS, MOVING FORWARD: BACKWARD DESIGN IN THE IMMERSION CLASSROOM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PLANNING BACKWARDS, MOVING FORWARD: BACKWARD DESIGN IN THE IMMERSION CLASSROOM Maria Teresa de la Torre Aranda

  2. Goal:Provide participants with an overall understanding of the three stages of backward design by exploring how setting clear goals and assessment criteria yields evidence of learning. Expectation: Participants will take away one or two tools that they will be able to apply when planning their next lesson/workshop.

  3. BACKWARD DESIGN IN THE IMMERSION CLASSROOM

  4. The trip metaphor: Length Destination BACKWARD DESIGN IN THE IMMERSION CLASSROOM

  5. Kind of trip Options (fun / academic studies / business…) Transportation Accommodation Documents (visa? passport? ID...) With company or alone? Package tour? People Expenses / Budget Currency (local or foreign?) Weather conditions (Surprises? The unexpected...) ………… BACKWARD DESIGN IN THE IMMERSION CLASSROOM

  6. How was the trip? (assessment refers back to planning and expectations) BACKWARD DESIGN IN THE IMMERSION CLASSROOM

  7. The two sins of traditional design BACKWARD DESIGN IN THE IMMERSION CLASSROOM • The error of activity-oriented design: hands-on without being minds-on • Coverage: “If it’s Tuesday, this must be Belgium...”

  8. Key Design Questions: BACKWARD DESIGN IN THE IMMERSION CLASSROOM • To what ends is the teaching directed? • What are the big ideas and important skills to be developed during the unit? • Do the students understand what the learning targets are? • To what extent does the evidence of learning from the unit reflect worthwhile content standards? • What understandings will emerge from all this and endure?

  9. The three stages of backward design: 1. Identify desired results 2. Determine acceptable evidence 3. Plan learning experiences and instruction BACKWARD DESIGN IN THE IMMERSION CLASSROOM

  10. BACKWARD DESIGN IN THE IMMERSION CLASSROOM Expected outcomes (sample A): Understanding the definition of invertebrates Studying the general aspects of the six groups of invertebrates Studying the simplest animals, the sponges, and understanding how their specialized cells and reproduction work

  11. BACKWARD DESIGN IN THE IMMERSION CLASSROOM Assessment (sample A) Assessment will be performed through discussions in class and also the exposition of the students’ ideas and concepts. A list of exercises will also be used to assess the students’ mastering of the content.

  12. BACKWARD DESIGN IN THE IMMERSION CLASSROOM Expected learning outcomes (sample B) Students should be able to describe the structures and functions of the respiratory system. Students will analyze and identify the different types of muscles and their distinct functional characteristics. They will investigate the respiration process as a whole and also the specificities related to it.

  13. BACKWARD DESIGN IN THE IMMERSION CLASSROOM Assessment Students will build a lung/diaphragm model and will describe the functionality of the respiratory system through it.

  14. BACKWARD DESIGN IN THE IMMERSION CLASSROOM Assessment Language?

  15. “Understanding is revealed in performance, as transferability of core ideas, knowledge, and skill, on challenging tasks in a variety of contexts. Thus, assessment for understanding must be grounded in authentic performance-based tasks.” (Mc Tighe and Wiggins,p.153) “...a type of divergent thinking [in which] it is unlikely that the right solution to a problem can be set in advance”(Bloom, Madaus, & Hastings, 1981) Thinking like an Assessor

  16. What are the different types of evidence required by Stage 1 expected outcomes? Against what criteria will I assess my students’ work and levels of quality? Do these assessment tools distinguish those who really understood from those who only seemed to? Does the evidence enable me to infer the students’ knowledge and skill? Do I know the source of my students’ mistakes? Thinking like an Assessor What do the students know? What are they able to do?

  17. How do you know that you know?

  18. Using the Six Facets to Build Assessments for Understanding • A student who really understands... • Can explain • Can interpret • Can apply • Sees in perspective • Demonstrates empathy • Reveals self-knowledge

  19. Using the Six Facets to Build Assessments for Understanding Topic: Grade 9 students are working on a Visual Arts unit about “A Semana de 22”, the Brazilian Modern Art movement that took place in São Paulo in 1922. What performance tasks can you think of for each one of the six facets on the previous slide?

  20. BACKWARD DESIGN IN THE IMMERSION CLASSROOM “To begin with the end in mind means to start with a clear understanding of your destination. It means to know where you’re going so that you better understand where you are now so that the steps you take are always in the right direction.” Stephen Covey, The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People, 1989, p. 98

  21. Reference Understanding by Design. Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe. Pearson Merrill Education/ASDC. 2006

  22. Thank you! terry.aranda@beityaacov.com.br

More Related