George Homans. (1910-1989). “If you look long enough for the secret of society you will find it in plain sight: The secret of society is that it was made by men, and there is nothing in society but what men put there”. Background. Born to wealthy family in Boston on August 11, 1910
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
“If you look long enough for the secret of society you will find it in plain sight: The secret of society is that it was made by men, and there is nothing in society but what men put there”
Born to wealthy family in Boston on August 11, 1910
Eldest of four children
Came from three generations of doctors
Looked up to his father Robert, had mixed feelings about his mother
George was healthy, but small and weak
Family had their own library, which George took advantage of
Went to top private schools, then Harvard
Did not study Sociology, but was introduced to the discipline by a close professor, Bernard DeVoto
Became interested in Sociology by living in environment where people were highly conscious of social relations
“Laws of sociology are the laws of snobbery”
Went to work for newspaper are graduation
Paper failed due to Great Depression
Being unemployed with nothing to do, he attended a seminar at Harvard
Given by Lawrence Joseph Henderson
Theories of Vilfredo Pareto
Sociologist concerned with economic distribution
All individuals will be made worse off with everyone being made worse off
Was so impressed he co-wrote An Introduction to Pareto
Was appointed as a junior fellow in sociology at Harvard
Brought him in contact with new works in industrial sociology
Exposed to work of functional anthropologists
Became an instructor of sociology until 1941
Left teaching to serve in the U.S. Navy to support the war
Came back to teaching after four years
Taught under Parsons
Was critical of Parsons work and feud developed between them
Thought Parsons found examples to fit his theories
The study of sociology should explain individual behavior and interactions, not the large scale structures other sociologists were concerned with
People will continue to engage in behaviors they find rewarding and cease behaviors that have too high of costs
World consists of interacting persons exchanging rewards and punishments
Problem for researchers is to weigh the value individuals place on specific rewards and costs
Other contributors to the theory:
Expanded Homan’s theory by extending it to more complex issues like, social structures, organizations, and bureaucracy
Created her own version of social exchange theory
Added to theory saying that we don’t always expect a reward for actions, but we expect others to help us in the future
Introduced the idea of free riders
Homans set out a basic framework of exchange theory
Skinner was the inspiration behind Homan’s psychology
Food is the basic goal sought by animals
Animal behavior can be shaped by giving or withholding of food
Food is the reward for animals
Humans more likely to seek approval, love and money
Rewards and punishments may differ, but the mechanisms involved are the same
Rational choice theorists see social interaction as a process of social exchange
Parsons- if actions are self-interested, how is social life possible?
Homans would respond- If you get a sense of satisfaction from helping others, then giving help is an act of rational self-interest
1. The success proposition: The principle of reward
If past activity was rewarded, individual is more likely to repeat activity
Shorter interval between behavior and reward, the more likely individual will repeat action
The more often an action is rewarded, the more likely individual will repeat action
2. The stimulus proposition: The principle of experience
If a similar stimulus presents itself and it resembles a previously rewarded activity, individual is likely to repeat their course of action
3. The value proposition: Reward and punishment, the principle of value of outcome
The more valuable an activity that another gives, the more an individual will emit activity rewarded by the activity of the other
If you like someone's company, you will engage in behavior that the other finds desirable
4. The deprivation-satiation proposition: Principle of diminishing returns
The more often a reward has recently been received, the less valuable further reward becomes
If forced for a long time to go without a certain reward, individual will lose interest and move on
5. The aggression-approval proposition: Principle of distributive justice
When behavior does not receive the expected reward, the response is anger
Will find the aggression rewarding
When individual receives greater reward than expected, or does not receive expected punishment, he/she will be pleased
The nature of social science
Response to Parsons & structural-functionalism
Explanation of behavior was only possible through the use of propositions
Explanation by concept is not an explanation
Confronted Durkheim’s structural functionalism on three main issues
1. Level of Emergence
Homans believed all emergent social phenomena could be explained from psychological propositions
2. Durkheim’s View of Psychology
During Durkheim’s day psychology was primitive
3. Durkheim’s Methods of Explanation
Was concerned with the relationship between cause and effect
Elements of the group system
Activity- What group members do
Interaction- Relation of the activity of one member of that group to that of another
Sentiment- Feelings of group members with respect to the group
Norms- Code of behavior adopted by group
Relationship between internal and external group systems
Internal system is subject to change as a result of fluctuations from the group members
Collapse of a civilization can be explained by failure of a number of small groups to meet group’s needs
Better chance of group survival if members fulfill their roles
InfluencesBernard DeVoto, Lawrence Henderson, and Elton Mayo
Bernard DeVoto was a junior member of the teaching staff at Harvard who Homans came into close association.
DeVoto was an instructor of English, and was Homans’ American Literature tutor.
DeVoto introduced Homans to the great publisher, Alfred Knopf, and a professor named Lawrence Joseph Henderson and his assistant Elton Mayo, who introduced Homans to Sociology
Mayo instructed Homans, as with the rest of his students, to read books by prominent social anthropologists, because at this time the cultural anthropologists were intellectually dominant.
The concept of reciprocity became a critical element in Homans’ exchange theory. The concept of exchange itself was influenced by Malinowski’s discussion of “The Gift”.
Anthropologists and exchange theorists argue that a crucial aspect of gift exchanges bind society together through mutual obligations.
InfluencesB.F. Skinner & Psychological Behaviorism
Homans treated the social exchange between Skinner and his pigeons as the paradigm of all social exchange.
In formulating his version of exchange theory, Homans turned to the behavioral school of experimental psychology founded by his friend Skinner.
Homans’s sociology is an attempt to build a theory about social life from the basic behavioristic propositions derived from Skinner’s psychology of operant conditioning
InfluencesEconomics and Utilitarianism
Rational choice theorists, such as those found in the exchange theory paradigm, have adopted 4 basic economic propositions:
Individuals are rational profit maximizers.
The more of something an individual has, the less interested they will be in more of it.
The prices at which goods and services will be sold in a free market are determined directly by the tastes of prospective buyers and sellers
Goods will generally be more expensive if they are supplied by a monopolist than if they are supplied by a number of firms in competitions with each other
Utilitarians argued that behavior was more or less a moral activity according to the amount of utility it bestowed on individuals.
Simmel was one of the first early major social theorists who attempted to identify universal characteristics of human behavior.
In 1958, Homans wrote an article for a special issue of the American Journal of Sociology in honor of Simmel. Homans urged small-group researchers to integrate laboratory experiments with quantified field work, and to reduce the propositions established to those of psychological explanations.
Homans is, of course, best known for “creating” exchange theory. But nowhere in his descriptions of propositions does he use the term “exchange.”
Exchange theory combines the principles of psychological behaviorism, basic economics and utilitarianism, with a focus on interactions between humans.
Homans proposed a number of propositions that he believed could explain any, or all, human behaviors. To demonstrate the relevance of these propositions to today’s world is nearly pointless, as any behavior that one can think of can be easily be answered by one or more of his propositions.
Homans wrote extensively on the group system and the group structure. His ideas have maintained their relevancy because of the reality of the large number of small group interactions that humans engage in.
The formation of a group involves the development of integrative bonds that unite individuals in a cohesive unit
1. impressing others
2. social approval
Homans’ brilliant works and contributions to social theory are only at the early stages of recognition. His insights of human behavior will continue to inspire social thought well into the third millennium.
Realism vs. Idealism
Realist – Society is created by man, which indicates that reality itself was made by man. One reality is accepted by everyone, and the job of the scientist is to figure out why people act the way they do in this reality/society.
Realism vs. Nominalism
Nominalist – Believes that everything was made by man, so everything is a social construct of man.
Idealism vs. Materialism
Materialist – believes that everything in society was put there by man