1 / 15

Techniques for determination of deep level trap parameters in irradiated silicon detectors

Techniques for determination of deep level trap parameters in irradiated silicon detectors. AUTHOR: Irena Dolenc ADVISOR: prof. dr. Vladimir Cindro. Motivation.

theophilus
Download Presentation

Techniques for determination of deep level trap parameters in irradiated silicon detectors

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Techniques for determination of deep level trap parameters in irradiated silicon detectors AUTHOR: Irena Dolenc ADVISOR: prof. dr. Vladimir Cindro

  2. Motivation • Silicon detectors usually used as inermost part of tracking system in particle physics detectors → can receive severe levels of radiation → cause of bulk damage which deteriorates detector performance • Radiation damage effects caused by lattice deformation: • change in effective dopant concentration which effects full depletion voltage • increase of leakage current • deterioration of charge collection efficiency: part of the drifting charge, created by ionizing particle, is temporarly trapped by the defects introduced with irradiation • Damage mechanism: • irradiation particles knock off Si atoms • dislocated Si atoms (interstitials), empty lattice sites (vacancies), impurities (eg. O, C) form defect complexes → introduction of energy levels (traps) in the band gap • For the developement of more radiation hard Si detectors the knowledge of defect kinetics and of correlation between microscopic defects and macroscopic properties of the detector is needed • The main tools for characterization of deep level defects: • Deep Level Transient Spectroscopy (DLTS) • Thermally Stimulated Current (TSC) technique

  3. Neutrality of the system → • Usually p+-n junction → • If ND,n comparable with NA,n than ND,n must be replaced with effective dopant concentration Neff =│ ND,n - NA,n│ • Desired detector operation voltage V > full depletion voltage VFD • Si detector: a diode operated under reverse bias where the depleted region acts like ionization chamber • Capacitance Operation principles of silicon detectors

  4. Occupation of a defect states wth concentration Nt , energy level Etand average occupation probability Pt density of occupied defects density of non occupied defects • Change of a defect occupancy possible by • electron capture with rate • electron emission with rate • hole capture with rate • hole emission with rate • Defect parameters (besides Et) that are determened by DLTS or TSC method: • capture coefficients → • emission probabilities → en,p • The rate of change of the defect ocupancy Shockley-Read-Hall statistics

  5. Thermal equilibrium • Pt= Fermi function • steady state → dnt /dt =0 • no current → no net flow of electrones or holes between conduction and valence band → Rp=Gp, Rn=Gn Relations between en,pand cn,p remain valid non-equilibrium conditions → defect is fully described by Etand n,p extraction of Pt→ Eiacts like EF in thermal equilibirium electron traps generation centers (leakage current) hole traps Shockley-Read-Hall statistics • Space charge region in steady state • carrier concentration negligible: p,n ~0 → capture processes can be neglected • steady state → dnt /dt =0

  6. Electron trap → located in the upper half of the band gap: DLTS: principle of operation Deep level transient spectroscopy (DLTS): uses capacitance transient signals resulting from relaxation processes following an abrupt change of bias voltage or light appliedto the sample being investigated. During the measurement the device must be partially depleted!

  7. DLTS: principle of operation • Hole trap → located in the lower half of the band gap:

  8. DLTS: determination of trap parameters Electron trap of acceptor type: • Capacitance after the filling pulse • Effective dopant concentration after the filling pulse • Density of occupied traps after the filling pulse • Capacitance after the filling pulse

  9. DLTS spectrum High T: emission process to fast to be observed Peak observed at Tmax where emission time satisfies Low T: emission process to slow to be observed • Extraction of parameters • Nt extracted form DLTS peak since nt(0)  Nt • Et extracted from slope of Arrhenius plot • n from the intercept of Arrhenius plot with ordinate • Several temperature scans with different tW = t2-t1→ Arrhenius plot: • Connection between en and n DLTS: determination of trap parameters

  10. DLTS: example of a DLTS spectrum

  11. TSC: principles of operation • DLTS: observing the change in depth of SCR, due to emission of trapped charge, by measuring capacitance transient • Thermally Stimulated Current technique (TSC): observing release of trapped charge directly, by measuring the current due to emission of trapped carriers Measurement process: • Cooling: Sample is coold to a low T. Cooling under reverse bias → traps are not filled with carriers • Filling: • Switching to zero bias → filling with electrons • Switching to forward bias → electrone and hole injection • Illumination with short-λ laser of n-side (filling only with electrons) or p+-side (filling only with holes) • Recording: Heating under reverse bias with constant heating rate. At some T emission probability is no longer negligible → trapped charge is rapidly emitted and swept out of SCR → peaks in current signal

  12. TSC: example of TSC spectrum

  13. Density of occupied traps during the heating • Determination of Nt • From the area under TSC peak • From the peak height TSC: determination of trap parameters Electron trap • Current due to emitted trapped charge during the heating • en>>ep • During whole TSC scan device fully depleted → w(t)=detector thickness D

  14. Position of the TSC peak at Tmax which satisfies By repeating TSC temperature scans with different heating rate β, a plot is obtained • ΔE=EC –Et→ extracted from the slope of the plot • σn→ extracted from the intercept with the ordinate • Delayed heating method • Several TSC scans performed from starting point T0with different delay times τd between end of the filling pulse and start of the heating → plotln(ITSC,max) versusτd • ITSC(t) nt(0) exp(- en(T0) τd )→TSC peak decreases with increasing τd from the slope of a plot emission probability en(T0) is obtained • Repeating procedure at different T0→ Arrhenius plot • Connection between en and n: • ΔE=EC –Et→ extracted from the slope of the plot • σn→ extracted from the intercept with the ordinate • Deconvolution method: • numerical fit to the whole spectrum TSC: determination of trap parameters • Variable heating method

  15. Summary • TSC and DLTS → techniques for determination of deep level traps parameters, based on observing reversely biased detector response to applied light or an abrupt change of biased voltage (filling of traps with holes and/or electrons) • Difference between DLTS and TSC • DLTS method: • Capacitance transient after the filling process is measured • Capacitance transient caused by the change of the width of SCR due to emission of carriers that were trapped during the filling • During the measurement device must be biased with the voltage lower than full depletion voltage • TSC method: • Sample is cooled to a low temperature before filling • Emission of trapped carriers observed directly by measuring the current while heating the sample • Device is fully biased during the measurement

More Related