1 / 15

What are some ways to decrease the amount of stray animals in Salinas, Ca ?

What are some ways to decrease the amount of stray animals in Salinas, Ca ?. Kelsie Campbell Molecular Biology major CSUMB 6 May 2014. http:// www.randolphcounty.us /county-services/public-safety-law-and-justice/animal-control. Stray Animal Crisis Nationally.

tawana
Download Presentation

What are some ways to decrease the amount of stray animals in Salinas, Ca ?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. What are some ways to decrease the amount of stray animals in Salinas, Ca? Kelsie Campbell Molecular Biology major CSUMB 6 May 2014 http://www.randolphcounty.us/county-services/public-safety-law-and-justice/animal-control

  2. Stray Animal Crisis Nationally • In the United States: 2.7 million animals euthanized per year • 2011: Senator Lieu issued bill • Bill vetoed by Governor Jerry Brown http://urbanrescues.com/more-information/shelter-statistics/

  3. Stray Animal Crisis locally • In 2008, Salinas Animal Services took in 3,938 animals • 2009: Shelter had to reduce holding time of animals • Four to three days • 2009: 3,908 animals • 2010: 4,246 animals http://partyforthepaws.com/beneficiaries.html http://norcalpetadoptions.com/organizations/detail/salinas-animal-shelter

  4. Continuing Water Crisis • In 2013, Salinas water quality reported contamination • Inorganic and organic contaminants • Pesticides and herbicides • Radioactive contaminants • Microbial contaminants http://www.montereyherald.com/ci_20163900/report-nitrate-pollution-beginning-affect-salinas-valley-water

  5. Specifically Approaching Stray Animal Issue • Mutually exclusive policy options: • 1) requiring microchips governmentally funded • 2) requiring microchips personally funded by pet owners • 3) not requiring microchips http://blogs.rgj.com/mostlydogs/2012/11/13/washoe-board-votes-for-free-pet-microchips-and-waiver-of-late-fees-for-dog-license-renewal-in-2013/

  6. Who is involved in this issue? • Animal Activists • Pet Owners in Salinas • Public Health Activists

  7. Animal Activists • Value: animal’s lives • Fact: “amount of cats returned to owners increased 20% and amount of dogs returned to owners increased 2.5% when microchipped” • Assumption: More animals microchipped=decrease amount of strays=decrease amount of animals euthanized https://www.secularstudents.org/animalrights

  8. The Salinas Pet Owners • Value: personal finances • Facts: “In 2012, the average household income is $58,109 with four individuals inside the home with 35.6% of the community at or below the poverty level” • “Microchips at a veterinarian cost around $45” • Assumption: Salinas is a low income neighborhood= individuals may not be able to afford the cost of a microchip http://www.city-data.com/income/income-Salinas-California.html

  9. Public Health Activists • Value: health of the public • Fact: “3.2% of human deaths caused by unsafe water” • “In past ten years, 28 people in the US have died due to being infected by rabies” • “1 in every 100 people die from leptospirosis if not treated” • Assumption: Stray animals negatively impact the health of the public, so a decrease in the amount of strays would benefit the public. http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CDkQFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffyi.uwex.edu%2Fmrec%2Ffiles

  10. Evaluating policy options within the environmental sustainability criteria • how much the issue is protecting the natural world

  11. Evaluating policy options within the economic sustainability criteria • how great the policy will use the resources of society without unwanted wastage

  12. Evaluating policy options within the social equity criteria • how everyone in society will be affected in the issue and will the effectiveness be equal

  13. Recommendation of the a single policy option • Recommending requirement of microchip paid by government • Limitations: lack of concrete details • Concessions: too much governmental involvement • Justification: animal’s rights, environmental sustainability • Consequence: special planning, illegal ownership of animals • Accountability: increasing amount of businesses available to microchip

  14. http://www.petsvet.com/microchip http://science.howstuffworks.com/innovation/everyday-innovations

  15. Concluding the requirement of microchips • Requirement of microchips paid by government in Salinas, Ca would: • Decrease amount of strays • Provide microchips without owner’s paying • Increase amount of owner’s abiding • Set example to future generations and populations http://www.change.org/petitions/turkey-plans-to-kill-all-stray-animals

More Related