1 / 11

Italian Water Services Reform: Challenges and Prospects

Explore the state of water services in Italy post-implementation of Law 36/1994. Learn about the restructuring, competitive methods, entry barriers in tenders, and the intricacies of managing entities. Delve into the complex landscape of ATOs and the latest developments in major cities. Gain insights from experts and practitioners on the future of water management in Italy.

taurus
Download Presentation

Italian Water Services Reform: Challenges and Prospects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Watertime Final Conference Friday 25 November 2005, University of Greenwich, London Panel of practitioners and experts- Italian situation - ing. Renato Drusiani

  2. Milano Bologna Arezzo Roma Four examinated cities and general situation of Water Services in Italy

  3. 2006 (?) Number of managing entities (integrated) 80 - 100 1995 Number of managing entities (not integrated)  8,000 Law 36/1994 socalled Galli Law Main target of Italian water services reform: reduction of fragmentation Each managing area is called ATO New assignements of water services has to be made before the 31 december 2006

  4. Implementation of law n. 36/94 (June 2005) Milano Bologna Arezzo Roma Stato attuazione Servizio Idrico Integrato ≈ 55 % Italian population

  5. Milano Arezzo Bologna, Roma Competitive methods Assignment of the water services (sept.2005)

  6. Few participants at the tenders 2005 1999

  7. FRESH FISH BIDS WHY ARE TENDERS SO UNAPPETIZING?

  8. HIGH ENTRY BARRIERS REGARDING BIDDING REQUIREMENTS IMPOSSIBILITY OF GUARANTEEING AN ADEQUATE RETURN ON INCOME EXCESSIVE CONSTRAINTS /CONDITIONING FOR THE FUTURE MANAGER ATO PLAN UNRELIABLE PLAN HIGH CONFLICTUALITY Arezzo: in five years, investements and tariffs were renegotiated three times

  9. minimum value (52 gg) Dir. 93/38/CE Time to prepare technical-economical proposal (by tender announcement)

  10. Turnover requirement % Real turnover of ATO Turnover requirement for a Chief Company (group of 3 companies) to be admitted at the tender 356

More Related