1 / 21

フィードバック管理 と資源評価

フィードバック管理 と資源評価. 松石隆先生、菅野泰治先生、西村欣也先生はじめ北大の皆様に感謝. Feedback Management. Uncertainty in stock assessment Accountability Dynamic change in abundance Adaptability (tuning catch effort) Successive Monitoring!!!. Revised Management Procedure (RMP) in IWC.

tarika
Download Presentation

フィードバック管理 と資源評価

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. フィードバック管理と資源評価 松石隆先生、菅野泰治先生、西村欣也先生はじめ北大の皆様に感謝

  2. Feedback Management • Uncertainty in stock assessment • Accountability • Dynamic change in abundance • Adaptability (tuning catch effort) • Successive Monitoring!!!

  3. Revised Management Procedure (RMP) in IWC • Moratorium of commercial whaling since 1982 (until RMP?) • RMP was adopted in 1994, but has not yet enforced.

  4. Feedback Management for Sika deer in Hokkaido, Japan 試される大地 http://www.marimo.or.jp/Kushiro_shichou/ezosika/

  5. Density-dependent hunting pressure (adaptability) %P>50%: Emergent Decrease (<4 years) 25% < %P : Gradual Decrease 5% < %P : Gradual Increase %P <5% or after the severe winter: Ban-on-Hunting Hokkaido, tested land

  6. Stage-Structured Model sika deer has little densityeffect and I ignored Nc, Nf, Nm: No. of calves(0.5), females & males(≧1.5) Lfc(t)= Lmc(t)= exp[-Q(t)Hc(t)]exp[-Mc(t)]exp[-Rc(t+1)], Lff(t) = exp[-Q(t)Hf(t)]exp[-Mf(t)]exp[-Rf(t+1)] , Lmm(t) = exp[-Q(t)Hm(t)]exp[-Mm(t)]exp[-Rm(t+1)] , Hokkaido, tested land

  7. Risk Management We set the upper and lower limit (%P- & %P+) of population size P such that, within the next 1 century, Prob{P<1000 individuals} < 1% Prob{%P<%P- or %P> %P+} < 5%. Therefore, %P- 5%, %P+ 50% Hokkaido, tested land 2

  8. Population Indices • Catch & Watch per hunter day • Spotlight census • Helicopter census • Train accidents • Damage of agriculture & forestry • Uncertainty of absolute size Hokkaido, tested land 3

  9. Population index by spotlight census for eastern Hokkaido Population estimationhas large uncertainty Hokkaido, tested land

  10. Fallacy of 120 000 deer hypothesis • >30000 deer were killed every year since 1995 • Male deer is still abundant • Natural growth rate is 15-20% • Population began to decrease? • 160-240 thousand deer in 1993 Hokkaido, tested land

  11. RMP for south Pacific minke whale • Pt+1-Pt = r[1-(Pt /K)z]Pt-Ct • think uncertainty in r, K, Pt /K and Pt (relative and absolute P) • no age structure • ignore uncertainty in z (density-effect)

  12. IWC/SC concensus • 2000 minke whale is commercially exploitable. • Catch Limit is determined by Lt=2.12r (Pt /K-0.54)Pt • Scientific whaling catches now 400!

  13. South Pacific minke whale may be decreasing! (Butterworth et al. 1999)

  14. Recent IWC (SOWER) census data suggests • Minke whale population is 30%-70% as was in ca1990. • Anti-whaling NGO may think “Whaling is over”. • Japan Gov’t may think “this census is uncertain…”

  15. Why do minke whale decrease? • Artifact in monitoring • Ecosystem change • Short resource (krill) • Competition with other whales • Super-Compensation

  16. “Artifact Hypothesis” • RMP is realizable only under effective monitoring; • Scientific whaling does not satisfy RMP. • Precautionary approach. Commercial whaling isCritically Endangered

  17. Competition hypothesis • Competition decreases • Recruitment or fecundity? • Adult mortality? • Why did the minke whale increase in the 1980s?

  18. Super-Compensation • Demographic Momentumdue to drastic change in catch effort from the 1970 to 1990, • Age structure changed greatly. • Same phenomenon as southern bluefin tuna

  19. Age structure is changing

  20. Demographic Momentum by a Leslie type Model • Age at maturity = 11years • Moratorium in t=0 • RMP begin in t=30 • Tune recruitment,>Tune total stock. • Monitor age structure!!! • Scientific Whaling is useful

  21. Conclusion • Feedback management should investigate stock size and age structure. • Temporal decrease of minke whale may be explained by demographic momentum.

More Related