1 / 9

WG9 Report

WG9 Report. ISO/TC211 Plenary Meeting Riyadh, KSA 2006-11-14. WG9 Information Management. 7 Work Items (2 active in WG) 6709 Standard representation of geographic point location by coordinates 19127 Geodetic codes and parameters 19131 Data product specification

tait
Download Presentation

WG9 Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WG9 Report ISO/TC211 Plenary Meeting Riyadh, KSA 2006-11-14

  2. WG9 Information Management 7 Work Items (2 active in WG) • 6709 Standard representation of geographic point location by coordinates • 19127 Geodetic codes and parameters • 19131 Data product specification • 19135 Procedures for registration of geographical information items • 19138 Data quality measures: ISO 19135:2005 • 19113 & 19115 Amendments, ‘Quality Harmonization’ • 19145 Registry of representations of geographic point location • Convenor: Hiroshi Imai • 10th Meeting in Riyadh, 2006-11-11, 9:00-10:30 active WIs

  3. IS/TS and TC-level deliverables ISO/TS 19127:2005 Geodetic codes and parameters Project Leader: Julie Binder Maitra ISO 19135:2005 Procedures for registration of geographical information items Project Leader: Charles Roswell ISO/TS 19138 Data Quality Measures (to be issued soon) Project Leader: Gerhard Joos Editor: Erik Stenborg ISO/FDIS 19131 Data product specification (to be issued) EC Editor: Robert Walker ISO/DIS 6709 Standard representation of geographic point location by coordinates Project Leader: Kevin Kirby Editor: Larry Hothem voting terminates on 2007-02-15

  4. WG9 Meeting in Riyadh WG9 Meeting • Time: 2006-11-11, 09:00-10:30 • Participants: Jean Brodeur, Antony Cooper, Mohammed Dalbouh, Sang-Ki Hong, Alain Hubert, Hiroshi Imai, Li Li Ralf Lindren Project Team 19145 Meeting • Time:2006-11-11, 11:00-12:30, 13:30-16:302006-11-12: work independently for drafting

  5. WI 19113 & 19115 Amendments(Quality Harmonization Project) • Project Leader: Erik Stenborg • Editor: David Danko • Type: Preliminary Work (Stage 0 Project) • Meetings: • Ad hoc meeting in Stockholm, 2005-06 • 1st meeting in Montreal, 2005-09-12/13 • Discussion in WG9 meeting in Orlando, 2006-05-22 Project Leader will draft a report • 2006-09: Report is made by PL, confirmed by Convenor • 2006-10-02: N2072 Review Summary • Discussion in WG9 meeting in Riyadh, 2006-11-11 • Recommendation of Review Summary is confirmed

  6. Report (p.4 in N 2072) (1) This stage 0 project was initialised by Sweden as a result of observed discrepancies between ISO 19113:2002 and ISO 19115:2003. data quality scope (concerns, for a certain data quality subelement, homogenous parts of the dataset for which quality is reported scope(concerns a quality report for a dataset) difference This fundamental difference was evidently not satisfactorily explained in ISO 19113:2002 or ISO 19114:2003. ISO 19115 is less suited to deal with datasets with inhomogeneous quality than was envisioned by the teams working on ISO 19113/14 Several other differences have also been observed as a result of the initial one. Annex D contains some of the observed differences.

  7. Report (2) Future reviews of the standards concerned may well be accomplished during the systematic reviews. Review of ISO 19113 is however only meaningful if agreement is reached on harmonisation among 19113, 19114 19115 Structure of Annexes: Annexes A, B and C show the intended work, Annex D some of the initially observed differences,Annex E a UML diagram illustrating the quality concept of 19113.

  8. Recommendations Recommendations: • this stage 0 project should be cancelled • its intended work should be performed within the systematic reviews.  • systematic review of 19113 sould be issued after the plenary • voting period be shortened, from 6 to 5 months  new actions can be made in Rome timely.

  9. WI 19145 Registry of representations of geographic point location • Project Leader: Jean Brodeur • Type: Preliminary Work (Stage 0 Project) • NWIP (N1942, 2006-01-10) • Result of Voting for the NWIP (N1983, 2006-04-19) approved • Meetings: 1st PT Meeting: Orlando, 2006-05-22/23 2ndPT meeting: Riyadh, 2006-11-11/12 • Report review • Progress in drafting the report • Timetable review: • Final Draft in PT: February 2006 • Review Summary: April 2006 with this challenging schedule, presentation in Rome become possible.

More Related