1 / 11

Belief in God’s Testimony

Belief in God’s Testimony. Lamont, J. Faith in God’s Revelation in the Bible 2011 pp.1-7. What is testimony?. Testimony is believing someone when they make a claim, and believing them because we think they know what they are talking about and are telling the truth.

siusan
Download Presentation

Belief in God’s Testimony

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Belief in God’s Testimony Lamont, J. Faith in God’s Revelation in the Bible 2011 pp.1-7

  2. What is testimony? • Testimony is believing someone when they make a claim, and believing them because we think they know what they are talking about and are telling the truth. • We belief other peoples claims because we realise that most of the time peoples claims are correct.

  3. Belief in God’ Testimony Belief in God’s testimony differs in human testimony: • It is more certain than belief in human testimony. • It is more exact than belief in human testimony. • It is more mysterious than human testimony.

  4. How do we know the divine message isn’t being made up? • The Catholic belief is reasonable because there are signs that indicate the Catholic church is a messenger from God. • The signs don’t prove God is speaking through the Catholic Church, except that our faith tells us this and we belief this through testimony. • These signs are not the reason for believing the Catholic faith, the reason for believing is the acceptance of the knowledge and truthfulness of the speaker.

  5. The absence of proof is necessary for faith, because without it, faith wouldn’t be voluntary and it wouldn’t involve a decision to trust God. • Competing claims to divine revelation is important for people who are not believers who have to decide which religion is true. The Catholic Church has signs where other revelations don’t. • Weighing up signs cannot produce beliefs on its own, to believe you must make an act of will e.g. Baptism.

  6. Acts of will need motivation, a benefit the act is supposed to achieve. When seeking for God’s reward that will bring salvation, that is the proper motivation for faith. • The belief in God’s testimony gives us a reason for why Grace is needed to believe. The act of faith must exclude any possibility of falsehood.

  7. Catholic Church replies to obvious objections: Objection A) Is this position not a form of totally irrational fanaticism, demanding total blind assent? • The only way the catholic belief system could be called fanatical is if there was convincing evidence against the faith, which there is not. • The moment we come across an objection we can not answer, we don’t just change what we belief in. Catholics that do show this stubbornness towards their faith are not irrational because their behaviour will stop them from accepting objections to their faith and because they are questioning the strongest source of knowledge, God, they can’t be deceived.

  8. It’s important to remember when discussing fanaticism catholic beliefs, that our faith is largely about moral teachings and supernatural realities. These intellectual objections are hard to come by as we will never be able to really know. This is when our determination in our faith comes in. If we are certain in the beliefs of our faith we are not likely to question it.

  9. Objection B) What are these signs that supposedly show the Catholic faith to come from God? There is not enough space to attempt a proper answer but pointed to a main resource: Against Celsus, By Origen. He was an Alexandrian Christian philosopher and theologian. The book was written to defend an attack made of Christians by a man called Celsus.

  10. Origen believes that there is evidence that there are signs that establishes that we should believe, however our beliefs shouldn’t be based on these reasons. • He believes that our belief is simply based on Christ’s authority. • The strongest evidence that we have is the fulfillment in Jesus of the prophecies of Moses and other prophets. • We have Jesus’ miracles that attracted faith in the time of Christ, but now they take on many myths. Origen defends this by saying that Christ wasn’t a sorcerer, he also defends the apostles as they were eye witnesses to these events. They did not just make them up. Christian miracles still happen to this day just not as many as the apostolic times. • The church is more evidence for the truth of Christianity as that’s where his teachings live on.

  11. Questions: • How does belief in God’s testimony differ from belief in human testimony? 2) How do we know that the Catholic Church isn’t making the bible up?

More Related