1 / 48

The Internal Life of Non-Human Animals: Biological Perspectives

The Internal Life of Non-Human Animals: Biological Perspectives. How can we know what another animal is experiencing?. ANTHROPOMORPHISM Attributing human characteristics to animals or objects. TYPES OF ANTHROPOMORPHISM ANTHROPOCENTRIC How would I feel if I had a neck eight feet long?.

shirin
Download Presentation

The Internal Life of Non-Human Animals: Biological Perspectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Internal Life of Non-Human Animals: Biological Perspectives

  2. How can we know what another animal is experiencing?

  3. ANTHROPOMORPHISM Attributing human characteristics to animals or objects

  4. TYPES OF ANTHROPOMORPHISM ANTHROPOCENTRIC How would I feel if I had a neck eight feet long?

  5. TYPES OF ANTHROPOMORPHISM ANIMALCENTRIC What is it like to be a giraffe?

  6. TYPES OF ANTHROPOMORPHISM ANTHROPODENIAL Believing in human/animal dualism

  7. Cognition and Psychological Complexity

  8. COGNITION DEFINED The mental process of knowing, including such aspects as: ~ awareness ~ perception ~ reasoning ~ judgment

  9. THINKING 1) The formation of an abstract mental representation of an event or object external to the self and not physically present.

  10. THINKING 1) The formation of an abstract mental representation of an event or object external to the self and not physically present. 2) The ability to manipulate those representations to solve a problem.

  11. EVIDENCE OF “THINKING” IN NON-HUMAN ANIMALS

  12. COMPARATIVE NERVOUS SYSTEMS Structure, organization and neuro- physiological similar in many species.

  13. COMPARATIVE NERVOUS SYSTEMS Much of the structure, organization and neuro- physiological similar in many species.

  14. COMPARATIVE NERVOUS SYSTEMS Structure, organization and neuro- physiological similar in many species. No physical evidence that suggests that some animals can not form abstractions.

  15. COMPARATIVE NERVOUS SYSTEMS Structure, organization and neuro- physiological similar in many species. No physical evidence that suggests that some animals can not form abstractions. However, the primary area of integration in the human brain (cerebral cortex) is substantially reduced in non-human animals.

  16. LEARNING STUDIES AS A WINDOW ON PSYCHOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY

  17. TYPES OF LEARNING

  18. ASSOCIATIVE LEARNING Often called “simple learning.” Association of 2 previously unrelated events/objects.

  19. Two types of associative learning: CLASSICAL CONDITIONING Myers 2004 (1849-1936)

  20. CLASSICAL CONDITIONING One event predicts another

  21. CLASSICAL CONDITIONING One event predicts another Pavlov’s dogs: Meat elicits drooling Tone always comes before meat Tone elicits drooling

  22. OPERANT CONDITIONING One action results in another. Animal learns to OPERATE on his or her environment.

  23. REINFORCEMENTPUNISHMENT POS Add something Add something Beh more frequent Beh less frequent NEG Remove something Remove something Beh more frequent Beh less frequent

  24. ASK DOG TO SIT REINFORCEMENTPUNISHMENT POS Treat if Sits Jerk Leash if doesn’t NEG Pull on leash Show treat, withdraw until sits if doesn’t sit

  25. TRANSFER OF LEARNING More complex than simple associational learning

  26. TRANSFER OF LEARNING Boal and Octopus (1991) Correct choice = odd item

  27. Successful for new combinations IF familiar objects Unsuccessful if objects unfamiliar EVIDENCE OF CONCEPT OF ODDITY OR NOT?

  28. LEARNING RELATIONSHIPS

  29. LEARNING RELATIONSHIPS Chimps can learn to select the LIGHTER of two grey cards

  30. LEARNING RELATIONSHIPS Pigeons can learn to peck colored cards in a SEQUENCE, regardless of their relative positions.

  31. LEARNING RELATIONSHIPS Chimps appear to understand the concept of a NUMERICAL MIDDLE, no matter how arranged.

  32. RERENTIAL COMMUNICATION STUDIES Fouts taught chimpanzee Ally 70 ASL signs Next taught Ally ‘synonyms’ Ω = † † = ®

  33. Experiment 1: Could Ally learn that given, Ω  = † † = ® then Ω  = ®

  34. Experiment 2: Savage-Rumbaugh at Yerkes Taught Yerkish to chimpanzees Sherman, Austin and Lana ∞ = apple à = give (me)

  35. Box of tools Key- board Sherman Austin

  36. Experiment 3: Inedibles Stick = á Key = O $ = ≤ ALL TOOLS = ‰

  37. Experiment 3: Edibles Beancake = ¥ orange = Œ bread = ¶ FOOD =fi

  38. CONCEPT OF NUMBER: Hauser compared young children and rhesus macaques:

  39. Counting is complex, includes an understanding of ORDINALITY Quantities are related - each number has a meaningful relationship to every other number.

  40. PROPERTY INDIFFERENCE 3 3

  41. CARDINALITY The LAST number is the TOTAL number. (understood by children at 3.5 - 4 yrs) 1 2 3 “How many hearts?”

  42. Davis and rat numerical ability study (1982): 1 2 3 4 5 6 *

  43. *

More Related