1 / 31

JUST COMPENSATION WHEN LAND IS USED FOR A RELOCATED PROPERTY FEATURE S. Steven Vitale, MAI

JUST COMPENSATION WHEN LAND IS USED FOR A RELOCATED PROPERTY FEATURE S. Steven Vitale, MAI svitale@valbridge.com 262-782-7990 valbridge.com. Severance Damages.

shira
Download Presentation

JUST COMPENSATION WHEN LAND IS USED FOR A RELOCATED PROPERTY FEATURE S. Steven Vitale, MAI

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. JUST COMPENSATION WHEN LAND IS USED FOR A RELOCATED PROPERTY FEATURE S. Steven Vitale, MAI svitale@valbridge.com 262-782-7990 valbridge.com

  2. Severance Damages • Per Eaton, severance damages are the “diminution of the market value of the remainder, in the case of a partial taking, which arise (a) by reason of the taking (severance) and/or (b) the construction of the improvement in the manner proposed.” • Appraisal Institute Dictionary of Real Estate says severance damages are “generally used to mean those damages to a remainder property that are compensable.” • WI Jury instructions state “Severance damages reduce the fair market value of the remaining property because of the partial taking.”

  3. Consequential Damages • Per Eaton, consequential damages are damages “arising as a consequence of a taking and/or construction on other lands.” • Generally non-compensable. • Certain items challenged at times such as noise, dust, odors, damage to business, frustration and loss of goodwill.

  4. Cost to Cure • Applied when remainder has suffered damage that can be corrected, both physically and economically. • Cost to cure cannot exceed diminution of value as uncured After Value. • Uncured After Value frequently very difficult to measure accurately due to lack of appropriate market data.

  5. Cost to Cure • Per Eaton: If a property with a deficiency is placed on the market, both the buyer and seller will consider the cost to cure the deficiency, if it is physically and economically curable. The price at which the property will sell is the value of the property as deficient or the value of the property without the deficiency minus the cost to cure the deficiency, whichever is higher.

  6. Surplus vs. Excess LandDictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 5th Edition Surplus Land Excess Land Land that is not needed to serve or support the existing improvement. The highest and best use of the excess land may or may not be the same as the highest and best use of the improved parcel. Excess land may have the potential to be sold separately and is valued separately. • Land that is not currently needed to support the existing improvement but cannot be separated from the property and sold off. Surplus land does not have an independent highest and best use and may or may not contribute value to the improved parcel.

  7. Other Examples

  8. Apartment Example • 100 unit apartment complex • 12 acre parcel • 2 acres being acquired (landscaped surplus land) • No loss of parking or impact of functional utility

  9. Apartment Example • 100 unit apartment complex • 12 acre parcel • 2 acres being acquired (landscaped surplus land) • No loss of parking or impact of functional utility • However, site allows density of 10 units per acre (12 acres x 10 units/acre = 120 units) • Owner had intended to add an additional 20 units

  10. Apartment Example

  11. Apartment Example

  12. Apartment Example

  13. Apartment Example

  14. Drugstore Example • 15,000 SF drugstore built 2 years ago. 20 year lease; 18 years remain. Triple net lease with $25.00 psf rent (15,000 SF @$25.00 psf = $375,000 annual net rent) • 4 acre parcel • 1 acre being acquired (landscaped surplus land) • No loss of parking or impact of functional utility

  15. Drugstore Example • Before Value • Fee Simple vs. Leased Fee? • Sales Comparison Approach • Based on comparable sales, but really driven by Income Approach • $375,000 ÷ 6.0% = $6,250,000 or $417 psf • Allocation of Value: • Land (4.0 acres at $400,000/ac.): $1,600,000 • Improvements: $4,650,000 • Total: $6,250,000

  16. Drugstore Example • Just Compensation • Land (1.0 acre at $400,000/ac.): $400,000 • Site Improvements: $20,000 • Total: $620,000 • After Value (Fee Simple vs. Leased Fee) • No change to lease or income stream • Sales Comparison Approach (But really driven by Income Approach: $375,000 ÷ 6.0% = $6,250,000 or $417 psf) • Allocation of Value: • Land (3.0 acres at $400,000/ac.): $1,200,000 • Improvements: $5,050,000 • Total: $6,250,000

  17. Other Issues

  18. Other Issues • Dehydration • Hunger • Thirst

  19. The End … Thank You S. Steven Vitale, MAI svitale@valbridge.com 262-782-7990 valbridge.com

More Related