1 / 20

Space Industry Forum 2005 “Strengthening the Government-Industry Partnership”

Space Industry Forum 2005 “Strengthening the Government-Industry Partnership”. Support to the Warfighter: Can Industry Do Better? 25 August, 2005 “Strengthening the Government-Industry Partnership”. Why Are We Here.

sheng
Download Presentation

Space Industry Forum 2005 “Strengthening the Government-Industry Partnership”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Space Industry Forum2005 “Strengthening the Government-Industry Partnership”

  2. Support to the Warfighter: Can Industry Do Better? 25 August, 2005 “Strengthening the Government-Industry Partnership”

  3. Why Are We Here • This is Industry’s chance to identify changes to facilitate their support to the warfighter • This is the Government’s chance to identify Industry actions that would improve “supporting the warfighter”

  4. Issue 1: Are Government requirements clearly articulated for Industry action? • Findings: • - Support to warfighter is key but the warfighter may not know / may not be able to articulate their requirement • - Situation and requirements will change by the time metal bending begins and when the product is delivered • Observations: • - Acquisition system needs to be responsive • - Spiral development; “plug and play” can contribute; • - Possibilities: Flexible contract vehicles; more application of NRO processes/best practices; commercial practices • - Industry has responsibility to discover/flesh out needs & provide solutions

  5. Issue 2: Are we flexible enough to respond to needs of warfighter? • Findings • - Different systems prevent interoperability • - System Engineer process essential (CDD  System Spec) • - Requirements traceability must work both ways • Observations • - Need common set of processes/standards • - Need forums to facilitate gov’t / industry interaction • - Goal is to facilitate Joint and foreign warfighter support

  6. Issue 3: Are we too focused on Systems vs Solutions? (What are we doing to suppress/address User/Operator requirements/needs) • Findings • - Industry focused on profit/fee • - Customer needs more non materiel solutions • - Everything has to have a Joint focus • Observations • - Industry fact of life is “making money and satisfying shareholders” • - More analysis now required by Government due to JCIDS process; Not a timely process • - Multiple Phase A study contracts followed by down select and development can help

  7. Issue 4: How to get from an Idea to execution; more innovation/demos/experiments • Findings • - Limited contractor investment funds; expensive; ?payoff • - ATD/ACTD/TTI/Rapid acquisition program exist • - Need more process for transition to dev programs • - Government wants “something: but Industry “solution” may not be what is needed—Industry can’t do this alone • Observations • - Industry and gov’t need to interact on requirements for future solutions/current needs • - Need more government funded IR&D/CRAD • - More Joint Experimentation • - More extensive use of Battlelabs

  8. Contracting Workshop25 August, 2005 “Strengthening the Government-Industry Partnership” PANEL MEMBERS Mike McAdams – AFSPC/MSK Russ Ogrimz – AFSPC/MSZ Lt Col Chuck Jones – AFSPC/DRNN Tim Roberts - Scitor

  9. Performance Based Contracting • It’s the law • Easy Concept • Hard to implement (Especially hard for Advisory and Assistance Services type contracts)

  10. IDIQ/CAASETA • Primary benefit is requirements management at Headquarters level (not achieved yet) • Goal is to apportion work so contractors are not “staff augmentees” • Challenges • Performance-based SOWs • Training for everyone • Small/short-term T.O.s • Costs/Impacts • To Government • To Contractor teams

  11. Communications Opportunities • Day Forum for exchange between Industry and Government • Workshop to determine metrics for performance outcomes • Capture costs of doing business both for Government and Industry – educate everyone on results • Publish policy on communications among Government and Industry

  12. The Future of Competitive Sourcing 26 August, 2005 “Strengthening the Government-Industry Partnership”

  13. Comp. Sourcing Opportunities • Presidential and OSD direction drives opportunities • BRAC initiative toward joint basing may open opportunities for consolidation of common functions • Limited budget encourages innovative solutions • Process improvements

  14. Comp. Sourcing Observations • Disconnect between govt and industry perceptions of CS • Govt wants to save money and preserve capability • Industry wants long term, profitable business venture • Govt often doesn’t know true cost of operation(s) • Better baseline metrics would provide: • Current cost and capability • Success criteria for competitive sourcing • Comprehensive, clear PWS (SOW) essential! • Process must be open, continuous, and independent to break through rice bowl mentality

  15. Competitive Sourcing Challenges • CULTURE • Resistance to change – change is hard! • Perception of A-76 encroaching on traditional military functions? • Future total force (Guard and Reserve) competes with industry? • Legal restrictions: Title 10, “deployability” • Problems of CS seem to transcend the services; it’s an inter-related and inter-dependent issue, especially at the Joint level • Govt and industry need a common language and common understanding of CS to partner effectively

  16. Small Business Goals26 August, 2005 “Strengthening the Government-Industry Partnership”

  17. 50,000’ Perspective • Lively Discussion • Positive & Negative Views Expressed w/o Hesitation • Improved Understanding of Difficulties from Both Government and Small Business Perspectives

  18. Topics Discussed • North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) selection • Small Business Set-Aside Requirements • Small Business Goal Establishment • AFSPC Goals/Achievements • Small Business Subcontracting • Mentor – Protégé Program

  19. Challenges facing Small Business • Large Omnibus Contracts • Locks Out Nonparticipants • Limits Exposure • Perception Primes Not Taking Advantage of SB Capabilities • Primes not meeting small business goals • Task Order Preparation Burdensome • Unnecessarily short turn around for proposals • Lengthy government eval period

  20. Take-Aways • Key = Responses to Sources Sought • Marketing of Capabilities • Commitment • More Attention to Promoting Small Business Opportunities • Mentor Protégé Program • Small Business Panels/Workshops • Prime/Small Business Communication • Deep Bench Within Small Business to Tap

More Related