1 / 28

Greater Portland-Vancouver Indicators An overview of the start-up phase

Greater Portland-Vancouver Indicators An overview of the start-up phase. GPVI is a growing regional partnership anchored by PSU and Metro. . May 2011. Overview. Project purpose and background Outcomes-based process Collaborative team process Project timeline Start-up phase deliverables

shana
Download Presentation

Greater Portland-Vancouver Indicators An overview of the start-up phase

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Greater Portland-Vancouver Indicators An overview of the start-up phase GPVI is a growing regional partnership anchored by PSU and Metro. May 2011

  2. Overview Project purpose and background Outcomes-based process Collaborative team process Project timeline Start-up phase deliverables Next steps Greater Portland-Vancouver Indicators

  3. GPVI purpose To ensure appropriate attention is paid to performance and measurement vision and goals plans implementation measurement Greater Portland-Vancouver Indicators

  4. GPVI purpose To better understand and improve our region’s triple-bottom-line progress through: data dialogue coordinated action Greater Portland-Vancouver Indicators Mike

  5. Focused Partners Focused Region A North Star to help focus regional actions and boost progress Progress Greater Portland-Vancouver Indicators

  6. Metro-PSU partnershipMetro perspective Broaden and strengthen outreach for its six desired outcomes Foster new, strategic approaches to achieve those outcomes Utilize Metro’s advisory and dialogue structure (MPAC, JPACT) Link indicators to projects and practice (e.g., evaluation criteria)

  7. Metro-PSU partnershipPSU perspective Regional indicators are mission critical and can stimulate deeper research and understanding GPVI will: - gather and disseminate information - convene regional partners in a neutral setting - stimulate dialogue and action on critical issues - promote regional approaches and partnerships.

  8. Principles outcome oriented collaboratively developed used and useful informs decisions serves multiple users, i.e., address Metro’s six outcomes Greater Portland-Vancouver Indicators

  9. Outcome oriented in practice Deliverables outcomes drivers indicators data Greater Portland-Vancouver Indicators

  10. Metro’s six outcomes align with GPVI

  11. GPVI theory of action Results Greater Portland-Vancouver Indicators

  12. Best practice example: education pipeline Data National leader in regional indicators producing biennial reports for civic vitality, arts, economy, education, environment, housing, safety and transportation. Actionable knowledge Because education impacts so many other desired outcomes, the Boston Indicators Project produced (on request) a special closer-look report, Boston’s Education Pipeline: A Report Card. Coordinated action The Pipeline report inspired groups of community leaders to create support for an additional $27 million for early childhood through post-secondary, and to hold themselves accountable to the results tracked by Pipeline report. Greater Portland-Vancouver Indicators

  13. Best practice example: retaining talent Data Longest running regional data report in the nation Actionable knowledge A topic is picked from each report for further study and strategy recommendations. In 2006, this lead to report: Retaining Talent: People and Jobs for the 21st Century. Coordinated action Implementation groups advocate for two years; JCCI tracks progress and reports that each of the three main recommendations from Retaining Talent were implemented. Greater Portland-Vancouver Indicators Sheila

  14. GPVI teams, start-up phase

  15. GPVI Advisory Team Co-chairs Wim Wiewel, president, Portland State University Gale Castillo, president, Hispanic Metropolitan Chamber Members Gail Achterman, chair, Oregon Transportation Commission Sam Adams, mayor, City of Portland Thomas Aschenbrener, president, Northwest Health Foundation Rex Burkholder, Metro Council Jeff Cogen, chair, Multnomah County Commission Lynn Valenter, acting chancellor, Washington State University-Vancouver Paul Dennis, mayor, City of Camas Denny Doyle, mayor, City of Beaverton Josh Fuhrer, councilor, City of Gresham Jack Hoffman, mayor, City of Lake Oswego Mike Houck, executive director, Urban Greenspaces Institute Nichole Maher, executive director, Native American Youth Family Center Pamela Morgan, management consultant, Graceful Systems, LLC Marcus Mundy, president and CEO, Urban League of Portland Joseph Santos-Lyons, director, Asian Pacific American Network of Oregon Bill Scott, general manager, Zipcar Portland Steve Stuart, chair, Clark County Commission Bill Wyatt, executive director, Port of Portland David Wynde, director, US Bank Community Relations Greater Portland-Vancouver Indicators

  16. Over 100 partner organizations are involved with the GPVI results teams. Greater Portland-Vancouver Indicators

  17. ENGAGEMENT GPVI timeline, start-up phase

  18. http://www.pdx.edu/ims/indicators/documents Equity panel Four themes disaggregation mapping need for betterdata community perspective Greater Portland-Vancouver Indicators

  19. http://www.pdx.edu/ims/indicators/documents Business plan institutional home governance funding plan Greater Portland-Vancouver Indicators

  20. Preliminary data themes The following slides introduce preliminary data themes from the results teams. They do not reflect a full or prioritized scope of outcomes and data, but do reveal some important trends and provide a taste of the complexity of the issues. See complete data themes document at: www.pdx.edu/ims/indicators/documents r April 8, 2011 Event: ” Greater Portland-Vancouver Indicators

  21. S A M P L E Greater Portland-Vancouver Indicators

  22. Peaks and troughs in employment are greater for the Portland region Economy

  23. Education

  24. Access and mobility

  25. Natural environment Neighborhoodswith:

  26. Circle of Well-being attracts which further strengthens which helps people achieve which increases revenues and decreases demand, leading to

  27. GPVI next steps Complete beta report and website June 30 Outreach and review July, August elected officials local governments foundations and nonprofits citizens Metro staff - review how the emerging indicators relate to ongoing work programs and data collection efforts   Establish permanent home September 2011 Launch operations Fall 2011 Greater Portland-Vancouver Indicators

  28. Contact for more information Rita Conrad GPVI project manager at Metro 503-813-7572 rita.conrad@oregonmetro.gov Sheila Martin Director of PSU’s Institute of Portland Metropolitan Studies 503-725-5170 sheilam@pdx.edu Mike Hoglund Director, research center at Metro 503-797-1743 mike.hoglund@oregonmetro.gov Greater Portland-Vancouver Indicators

More Related