1 / 33

Individual Behavior, Personality, and Values

Individual Behavior, Personality, and Values. Situational factors. Values Personality Perceptions Emotions Attitudes Stress. MARS Model of Individual Behavior. Motivation. Individual behavior and results. Ability. Role perceptions. 2- 2. S. M. BAR. A. R. Employee Motivation.

shana-berry
Download Presentation

Individual Behavior, Personality, and Values

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Individual Behavior, Personality, and Values

  2. Situational factors Values Personality Perceptions Emotions Attitudes Stress MARS Model of Individual Behavior Motivation Individual behavior and results Ability Role perceptions 2-2

  3. S M BAR A R Employee Motivation • Internal forces that affect a person’s voluntary choice ofbehavior • direction • intensity • persistence 2-3

  4. S M BAR A R Employee Ability • Natural aptitudes and learned capabilities required to successfully complete a task • Competencies  personal characteristics that lead to superior performance • Person  job matching • selecting • developing • redesigning 2-4

  5. S M BAR A R Role Perceptions • Beliefs about what behavior is required to achieve the desired results: • understanding what tasks to perform • understanding relative importance of tasks • understanding preferredbehaviors to accomplish tasks 2-5

  6. S M BAR A R Situational Factors • Environmental conditions beyond the individual’s short-term control that constrain or facilitate behavior • time • people • budget • work facilities 2-6

  7. Defining Personality • Relatively enduring pattern of thoughts, emotions, and behaviors that characterize a person, along with the psychological processes behind those characteristics • External traits – observable behaviors • Internal states – thoughts, values, etc inferred from behaviors • Some variability, adjust to suit the situation 2-7

  8. Nature vs. Nurture of Personality • Influenced by Nature • Heredity explains about 50 percent of behavioural tendencies and 30 percent of temperament • Minnesota studies – twins had similar behaviour patterns • Influenced by Nurture • Socialization, life experiences, learning also affect personality • Personality isn’t stable at birth • Stabilizes throughout adolescence • Executive function steers using our self-concept as a guide 2-8

  9. Five-Factor Personality Model (CANOE) Conscientiousness Careful, dependable Agreeableness Courteous, caring Neuroticism Anxious, hostile Openness to Experience Sensitive, flexible Extroversion Outgoing, talkative 2-9

  10. Five-Factor Personality and Organizational Behavior • Conscientiousness and emotional stability • Motivational components of personality • Strongest personality predictors of performance • Extroversion • Linked to sales and mgt performance • Related to social interaction and persuasion • Agreeableness • Effective in jobs requiring cooperation and helpfulness • Openness to experience • Linked to higher creativity and adaptability to change 2-10

  11. Jungian Personality Theory • Swiss psychiatrist Carl Jung • Identifies preferences for perceiving the environment and obtaining/processing information • Commonly measured by Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) 2-11

  12. Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) • Extroversion versus introversion • similar to five-factor dimension • Sensing versus intuition • collecting information through senses versus through intuition, inspiration or subjective sources • Thinking versus feeling • processing and evaluating information • using rational logic versus personal values • Judging versus perceiving • orient themselves to the outer world • order and structure or flexibility and spontaneity 2-12

  13. An individual’s self-beliefs and self-evaluations “Who am I?” and “How do I feel about myself?” Guides individual decisions and behavior Self-Concept Defined 2-13

  14. Three “C’s” of Self-Concept • Complexity • People have multiple self-concepts • Consistency • Improved wellbeing when multiple self-concepts require similar personality traits and values • Clarity • Clearly and confidently described, internally consistent, and stable across time. • Self-concept clarity requires self-concept consistency 2-14

  15. Four “Selves” of Self-Concept • Self-enhancement • Promoting and protecting our positive self-view • Self-verification • Affirming our existing self-concept (good and bad elements) • Self-evaluation • Evaluating ourselves through self-esteem, self-efficacy, and locus of control • Social self • Defining ourselves in terms of group membership 2-15

  16. Self-Concept: Self-Enhancement • Drive to promote/protect a positive self-view • competent, attractive, lucky, ethical, valued • Strongest in common/important situations • Positive self-concept outcomes: • better personal adjustment and mental/physical health • inflates personal causation and probability of success 2-16

  17. Self-Concept: Self-Verification • Motivation to verify/maintain our existing self-concept • Stabilizes our self-concept • People prefer feedback consistent with their self-concept • Self-verification outcomes: • We ignore or reject info inconsistent with self-concept • We interact more with those who affirm/reflect self-concept 2-17

  18. Self-Concept: Self-Evaluation • Defined mainly by three dimensions: • Self-esteem • High self-esteem -- less influenced, more persistent/logical • Self-efficacy • Belief in one’s ability, motivation, role perceptions, and situation to complete a task successfully • General vs. task-specific self-efficacy • Locus of control • General belief about personal control over life events • Higher self-evaluation with internal locus of control 2-18

  19. Social identity -- defining ourselves in terms of groups to which we belong or have an emotional attachment We identify with groups that have high status -- aids self-enhancement Self-Concept: Social Self Contrasting Groups IBM Employee Employees at other firms An individual’s social identity Live in U.S.A. People living in other countries Graduates of other schools University of Dallas Graduate 2-19

  20. Values in the Workplace • Stable, evaluative beliefs that guide our preferences • Define right or wrong, good or bad • Value system -- hierarchy of values 2-20

  21. Schwartz’s Values Model 2-21

  22. Schwartz’s Values Model • Openness to change – motivation to pursue innovative ways • Conservation -- motivation to preserve the status quo • Self-enhancement -- motivated by self-interest • Self-transcendence -- motivation to promote welfare of others and nature 2-22

  23. Values and Behavior • Habitual behavior usually consistent with values, but conscious behavior less so because values are abstract constructs • Decisions and behavior are linked to values when: • Mindful of our values • Have logical reasons to apply values in that situation • Situation does not interfere 2-23

  24. Values Congruence • Where two or more entities have similar value systems • Problems with incongruence • Incompatible decisions • Lower satisfaction/loyalty • Higher stress and turnover • Benefits of incongruence • Better decision making (diverse perspectives) • Avoids “corporate cults” 2-24

  25. Values Across Cultures: Individualism and Collectivism • Degree that people value duty to their group (collectivism) versus independence and person uniqueness (individualism) • Previously considered opposites, but unrelated -- i.e. possible to value high individualism and high collectivism 2-25

  26. Individualism High Individualism The degree to which people value personal freedom, self-sufficiency, control over themselves, being appreciated for unique qualities U.S. Italy India Denmark Taiwan Low Individualism 2-26

  27. Collectivism High Collectivism The degree to which people value their group membership and harmonious relationships within the group Italy Taiwan India Denmark U.S. Low Collectivism 2-27

  28. Power Distance High Power Distance • High power distance • Value obedience to authority • Comfortable receiving commands from superiors • Prefer formal rules and authority to resolve conflicts • Low power distance • Expect relatively equal power sharing • View relationship with boss as interdependence, not dependence Malaysia Venezuela Japan U.S. Denmark Israel Low Power Distance 2-28

  29. Uncertainty Avoidance High U. A. • High uncertainty avoidance • feel threatened by ambiguity and uncertainty • value structured situations and direct communication • Low uncertainty avoidance • tolerate ambiguity and uncertainty Greece Japan Italy U.S. Singapore Low U. A. 2-29

  30. Achievement-Nurturing Achievement • High achievement orientation • assertiveness • competitiveness • materialism • High nurturing orientation • relationships • others’ well-being Japan China U.S. France Chile Sweden Nurturing 2-30

  31. Three Ethical Principles Utilitarianism Greatest good for the greatest number of people Individual Rights Fundamental entitlementsin society Distributive Justice People who are similar should receive similar benefits 2-31

  32. Influences on Ethical Conduct • Moral intensity • degree that issue demands ethical principles • Ethical sensitivity • ability to recognize the presence and determine the relative importance of an ethical issue • Situational influences • competitive pressures and other conditions affect ethical behavior 2-32

  33. Supporting Ethical Behavior • Ethical code of conduct • Ethics training • Ethics hotlines • Ethical leadership and culture 2-33

More Related