slide1 n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Lutz Preuss, Michael Gold, Chris Rees School of Management Labour Unions and CSR: Initial Results from a Cross-Europea PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Lutz Preuss, Michael Gold, Chris Rees School of Management Labour Unions and CSR: Initial Results from a Cross-Europea

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 19

Lutz Preuss, Michael Gold, Chris Rees School of Management Labour Unions and CSR: Initial Results from a Cross-Europea - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 83 Views
  • Uploaded on

Lutz Preuss, Michael Gold, Chris Rees School of Management Labour Unions and CSR: Initial Results from a Cross-European Research Project. Introduction. rapid growth in interest in CSR across the globe

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Lutz Preuss, Michael Gold, Chris Rees School of Management Labour Unions and CSR: Initial Results from a Cross-Europea' - seven


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1
Lutz Preuss, Michael Gold, Chris ReesSchool of ManagementLabourUnions and CSR: Initial Results from a Cross-European Research Project
introduction
Introduction

rapid growth in interest in CSR across the globe

  • formal tools: UN Global Compact, OECD Guidelines, ISO 26000, GRI sustainability reporting guidelines
  • global financial crisis highlighted issue of legitimacy of corporate power

renewed attention to the relationship between business and key stakeholders, such as NGOs or local communities

but: one societal actor frequently absent in the CSR debate, namely labour unions

reasons for considering unions in csr
Reasons for Considering Unions in CSR

practical level

  • union role to defend the interests of the employee stakeholder
  • international labor cost competition has led to worsening conditions if not employment losses

theoretical level

  • mismatch in scholarly attention between outsider and insider groups
  • self-selected nature of NGOs versus unions as democratically accountable organizations

= what do unions make of the rise of CSR and to what extent do they engage with CSR initiatives?

literature on unions and csr
Literature on Unions and CSR

despite frequent attention in CSR literature on employees as stakeholders, trade unions themselves rarely considered

initial research: two polar opposites

  • unions are largely scepticalof CSR as it transfers yet more power to managers to make unilateral decisions (Preuss et al., 2006; Salzmann and Prinzhorn, 2006)
  • unions hope that CSR tools may allow them to recover some of the ground they lost during years of declining influence (Blowfield, 2007), e.g. Ethical Trading Initiative

= this study aims to go beyond this dichotomy and to cover a much wider geographic scope than prior research

theoretical lenses
Theoretical Lenses

1. ‘National business systems’ or ‘varieties of capitalism’ literature

national variation in the way key institutions – e.g. state, legal system, industrial relations – combine to embed social and economic structures and norms within particular ‘national logics’ (Whitley, 1999; Hall and Soskice, 2001)

2. Institutional theory

seeks cognitive and cultural rather than economic or efficiency-driven explanations of social phenomena

CSR less about going beyond the law but specifying how business-society relations are constructed in different ways in different national settings (Brammer et al., 2012)

methodology
Methodology

relative scarcity of prior research, hence exploratory research using case study approach

12 countries across Europe: Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Lithuania, Poland, Russia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom

within each country we studied:

  • national trade union confederations and
  • sectorallevel unions covering engineering, utilities and, where appropriate, textiles

sectors display different trajectories in global capitalism in terms of domestic versus global markets, quality product versus low-wage competition

methodology1
Methodology

data derived from semi-structured interviews as well as from complementary sources, like union documents

interviews were undertaken by country teams composed of scholars working on the intersection of industrial relations and CSR in each country

data collected: total of 71 interviews between November 2011 and March 2013

common interview schedule

findings to be published in edited book published by Routledge

united kingdom nbs classification
United Kingdom: NBS classification

“the principal European liberal market economy” (Hankéet al. 2007)

characterized by short-term finance, deregulated labour markets, far-reaching powers for CEOs, limited role of the state

labour movement decentralised and poorly coordinated

tradition of craft unionism but recent mergers led to general unions (e.g. Unite, 1.5m members, Unison, 1.4m members)

long history of CSR, from early 19th century philanthropists through business-driven CSR coalitions in 1980s to multi-stakeholder agreements today, e.g. Ethical Trading Initiative

united kingdom union positions
United Kingdom: Union Positions

predominantly sceptical understanding:

“… we live in a capitalist society and the reasons that any enterprise exists is to make money. … If they think that by appearing to be good corporate citizens, it helps the bottom line, then they’ll do it. If they don’t think so, then they won’t do it.” [GMB]

particularly critical of voluntary nature of CSR

but seen as useful concept to impress on employers that CSR covers working conditions and not just philanthropy

concerns in particular the international arena, where compliance with e.g. ILO Conventions is a crucial topic

united kingdom union engagement
United Kingdom: Union Engagement

use of CSR arguments to defend domestic employment

e.g. use of environmental arguments in case of threatened factory closure and relocation of production of a food item to Poland although the UK remains the main market

greatest visibility in the international arena: bring pressure on companies for failing to comply with own CSR policies

e.g. US clothing corporation claimed to be compliant with labour standards but union GMB found out that one of its Central American subsidiaries was in receivership and had not paid wages for three months

finland nbs classification
Finland: NBS classification

industrialised rather late but developed into an exemplary coordinated market economy

close links between industry, government and labour, state-led coordination of the economy, long-term investment in heavy industries and knowledge economy

cooperative industrial relationships, tradition of highly centralised wage bargaining but recently become more decentralised

paternalistic roots of CSR but replaced by welfare state from 1960s; somewhat strengthened again in the wake of the internationalisation of the economy since the mid-1990s

finland union positions
Finland: Union Positions

despite some scepticism, generally positive attitudes to CSR

“… it increases opportunities, [although] our foundation is so strong, that we’ve got these strong unions and we’ve got strong legislation, we’ve got strong official procedures so we don’t really have to be very afraid that it will begin to slide.”

support for the business case for CSR

overall seen as supporting traditional aims of the labor movement, e.g. developing dialogue between management and labor

finland union engagement
Finland: Union Engagement

domestically, CSR seen as tool to increase union legitimacy

“… when whole factories are closed down or activities are shifted to other countries and as a consequence you get a lot of redundancies, well in those circumstances especially these questions of responsibility arise and the idea that they should be considered more.”

internationally, unions use CSR commitments as a way of putting pressure on companies and on subcontractors

unions are increasingly networking with foreign unions, NGOs and MNEs to safeguard employee rights

slovenia nbs classification
Slovenia: NBS Classification

rare example of a coordinated market economy among post-Communist transition countries (Feldmann, 2006)

relative economic and political success based on coordination between business, government and labour; comprehensive bargaining coverage; industrial relations modelled along German lines

several union federations divided along political and industrial lines and strong competition among unions

CSR relatively new concept, popularised by the European Union

but strong emphasis on worker representation in Yugoslav economic model

slovenia union positions
Slovenia: Union Positions

overall sceptical perspective, reinforced in particular by the recent economic crisis

‘”This is all they opt for, competition, this liberal mantra, competition, competitiveness. …When I explained our understanding of CSR, he [the employers’ representative] said, ‘no way we can include all this’, he said, ‘this will hinder our competiveness’.”

overall, CSR is not seen as particularly effective

a ‘passive acceptance’ of the voluntary character of CSR by emphasizing that it is not on the agenda in times of crisis

slovenia union engagement
Slovenia: Union Engagement

unions in Slovenia have no strategies to actively and purposefully engage in CSR, although some ad hoc projects exist

electrical engineering union: company blacklist, where firms do not respond to union complaints about activities that are unlawful or harmful to employees

example of a conflict between union and a local environmental organization, due to the unsupported claims and demands made by the local environmentalists

conclusions
Conclusions

a ‘certain paradox in union attitudes to CSR’ (Segal et al., 2003) remains:

  • although CSR concerns fall into union remit at least partly
  • the initiative to develop CSR comes more or less entirely from management

Hungary: best CSR practice in their countries was promoted by foreign multinationals, e.g. those from Germany, even though in top-down and paternalistic way

however, some success for unions in marrying CSR to their own agenda, e.g. linking CSR to international development

= question of agency within NBS/VoC

conclusions1
Conclusions

significant cross-country differences

  • Finnish unions display a positive attitude to CSR
  • those in Belgium and Slovenia do not engage with CSR
  • middle position in Germany: unions display a degree of scepticism but also adopt a largely constructive approach

also major within-country differences, e.g. France

  • proactive position by ConfédérationFrançaiseDémocratique du Travail (CFDT)
  • reluctance to engage with CSR by Force Ouvrière (FO)

picture is far from static, as many unions detailed how their understanding of CSR has changed during recent years.

conclusions2
Conclusions

explaining differences in union understanding of CSR through NBS arguments

  • unions in liberal market economies more sceptical of CSR, e.g. UK but also Hungary and Poland
  • unions with the most proactive attitudes to CSR come from coordinated market economies, e.g. Finland
  • clearest support for business case for CSR only in Finland

yet no determinism

overlaid with other factors, not least the nature of the union membership, e.g. proactive attitude in UK union Prospect which organises managerial and professional staff