1 / 18

DOING GOOD WIND BUSINESS IN SOUTH AFRICA – EWEA 2014 Johan van den Berg CEO, SAWEA

DOING GOOD WIND BUSINESS IN SOUTH AFRICA – EWEA 2014 Johan van den Berg CEO, SAWEA. SUMMARY OF CONTEXT AS PER HAND-OUT INFORMATION. South Africa is a top 30 global economy with about 45,000 MW installed, and a very good wind regime

scout
Download Presentation

DOING GOOD WIND BUSINESS IN SOUTH AFRICA – EWEA 2014 Johan van den Berg CEO, SAWEA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DOING GOOD WIND BUSINESSIN SOUTH AFRICA – EWEA 2014 Johan van den Berg CEO, SAWEA

  2. SUMMARY OF CONTEXT AS PER HAND-OUT INFORMATION • South Africa is a top 30 global economy with about 45,000 MW installed, and a very good wind regime • Policy is favourable to wind power and envisages about 9,000 MW‘s installed by 2030 • Growth in the past years has been rapid • Localisation, socio-economic development and the advancement of previously disadvantaged South Africans are factors that are important alongside the cost of energy delivered. • Successful bids over the three procurement rounds averaged around € 0.11 (R1); € 0.08 (R2) and € 0.06 respectively • Average windfarms are large – > 80 MW • Capacity factors on successful bids on P50 are 35% +

  3. WIND REGIME

  4. PROCUREMENT FRAMEWORK • Competitive bid system within technologies for allocated MW‘s • 70% price • 30% other - socio economic development - local ownership, local content, job creation, community development etcetera – strong local content requirements • Process requires extensive documentation (7 x 5,000 pages) and implies significant cost (€ 200k – 400k in bid preparation) • Game for big and sophisticated players

  5. INDUSTRY GROWTH

  6. INDUSTRY GROWTH (2)

  7. INDUSTRY GROWTH (3)

  8. FIVE MAIN CHALLENGES EXERIENCED • Securing permits and approvals • Preparing a competitive bid that complies with  REIPPPP rules • Structuring socio-economic benefits in an optimal and sustainable manner • Complying with local content requirements • Ensuring grid access

  9. PERMITS AND APPROVALS • Similar to other jurisdictions • Environmental impast assessment – about a 15 month process costing about € 70,000 (birds, bats, visual impact, heritage, agricultural land). But the country is very large (Germany + France + Italy) and there is usually a place to go • Act 70/1970 – agricultural land • Radar/air force • Others • SA has extremely sophisticated law firms that understand this very well by now

  10. PREPARING A COMPETITIVE BID THAT COMPLIES WITH  REIPPPP RULES • As said above, 70:30 price/socio economic factors • There are minimum thresholds on certain socio economic aspects • The drive to empower, develop communities close to the projects is perhaps a world first and if successful, will create tremendous political capital • Suggest buy into the spirit of what is being aimed for, rather than “ticking boxes“ • In round 3, some communities had 40% shareholding in projects – this is financed by local banks through innovative structures

  11. PREPARING A COMPETITIVE BID THAT COMPLIES WITH  REIPPPP RULES (2) • The sophistication of the process requires expert advisors and leads to “bidding costs“ of € 150 – 300k • Bid bonds of about € 7,000/MW bid are required to ensure only responsible participants bid – these are doubled at preferred bidder stage

  12. STRUCTURING SOCIO-ECONOMIC BENEFITS IN AN OPTIMAL AND SUSTAINABLE MANNER • Main drivers are ownership by previously disadvantaged South Africans (“BBBEE“); economic development of communities; community ownership; socio economic benefits from wind farms (schools, health clinics, pension schemes) • The community‘s needs must be well understood • Find out “who is the community?“ and who speaks for them

  13. STRUCTURING SOCIO-ECONOMIC BENEFITS IN AN OPTIMAL AND SUSTAINABLE MANNER (2) • Recruit able and responsible peope to serve on Community Trusts • Employ expert consultants to optimise bid • Non-fulfillment of obligations can ultimately be a contractual termination event – so hire the best to ensure iongoing compliance and optimisation • See the opportunity not the onus

  14. COMPLYING WITH LOCAL CONTENT REQUIREMENTS • Industrialisation, job creation through localisation are key reasons for government‘s strong support of wind power • Thresholds started at 25% in Round 1 and are now at 40% • Breakdown, approximately, is Balance of Plant 25%; tower up to 15%, blade up to 15%, turbine approx 45% • Both steel and cement towers now made in SA • Hope that international blade manufacturer will come soon with certification

  15. COMPLYING WITH LOCAL CONTENT REQUIREMENTS (2) • SA makes Mercedes Benz 180 for the world market, so the ability is there • Distributed/hybrid electricity market in Africa includes 600 million people without electricity

  16. ENSURING GRID ACCESS • Present wind farms are aiming at locations where deep connection costs and their concomitant costs can be avoided • This means small/medium sized wind farms with “loop in loop out“ arrangements can be made, or proximity to large substations with spare evacuation capacity • Opposing projects (also solar) can sometimes sterlise grid if they succeed • Eskom the utility gives buget quotes (estimates) prior to bid • These are fully quantified later on – variances still too wide • SAWEA assisting Eskom with long term, strategic grid planning to unlock high potential areas

  17. SEE YOU SOON!

  18. THANK YOU Johan van den Berg CEO SAWEA johan@sawea.org.za 082 925 5680

More Related