120 likes | 211 Views
Explore the impact of Tempus on Quality Assurance methodology, criteria, and professional training for dynamic experts in Russian HEIs. Comparative analysis, bridging national and international QA standards, and overcoming obstacles in QA.
E N D
Independent Quality Assurance for Degree Programmes in Russia NadezdaKamynina Moscow state university of geodesy and cartography ZAGREB 12-13 JUNE, 2014
Background and TEMPUS influence Lack of a sound QA methodology Lack of well-defined QA criteria Domination of compulsory proceedings based on adopted regulations Need for dynamic QA experts training ZAGREB 11-13 JUNE, 2014
IQA TEMPUS Project: involvement of various stakeholders Various types of HEIs (EU+RU) Accreditation agency RF Ministry of Education and Science Independent experts ZAGREB 11-13 JUNE, 2014
IQA TEMPUS Project Comparative analysis Capacity building of RU HEI by means of a new QA system EU 2020 strategy International QA standards ZAGREB 11-13 JUNE, 2014
Comparative analysis • Different countries – different approaches • Questionnaire development – most important is to ask the right question • Where internal QA meets external QA • Key actors ZAGREB 11-13 JUNE, 2014
National level (ACCREDITATION) Legal framework, External level QA ? INTERNAL LEVEL QA Model in Russia ZAGREB 11-13 JUNE, 2014
Bridging the gap between national and international dimension of QA in Russia ZAGREB 11-13 JUNE, 2014
Models and standards of internal QA at Russian HEIs in international dimension • ISO 9000, EFQM, ENQA standards and guidelines etc. • Local guidelines based on the national legislation • Local guidelines based on EU practices ZAGREB 11-13 JUNE, 2014
National legal framework and Guidelines for QA • Federal Law “On Education in the Russian Federation” • National Agencies’ guidelines (Variety) • Rationale: • Rigid standards and bureaucratic guidelines, but no holistic and systemic procedures • Common principles that cover the diversity are needed, as well as reference points rather than a detailed methodology • NOT Underlining the responsibility of HEIs for quality improvement ZAGREB 11-13 JUNE, 2014
Quality assurance infrastructure:national or international? • Relevant groups • Academic staff • Non-academic staff • Students • Relevant tools • Relevant methodology • Sustainability ZAGREB 11-13 JUNE, 2014
Quality assurance obstacles/Debate points Unification of internal QA criteria on the national level Harmonisation with international QA practice Application of various models and standards Bridging the gap between academic and non-academic staff Flexible approach, standards and procedures relevant for diversity of institutions and programs ZAGREB 11-13 JUNE, 2014
Thank you for your attention ZAGREB 11-13 JUNE, 2014