160 likes | 308 Views
Investigating the impact of an intensive music curriculum on children's cognitive growth and self-regulation. The study compared an intensive music program with a conventional music class to explore enhanced learning outcomes. Preliminary results show positive gains in verbal comprehension, sound blending, and self-regulation skills.
E N D
Music and Movement Pilot Study:Preliminary Results Kelly A. Parkes, Ph.D. Isabel S. Bradburn, Ph.D. CDCLR Parent Meeting 1.13.10
Objectives • Teach validated music curriculum to CDCLR teachers and children • Assess feasibility of teachers learning and using curriculum • Replicate cognitive gains with more advantaged preschool sample • Explore self-regulation gains
Study Features • Sixteen weeks music curriculum • 4-5 times per week • Initial session modeled by Dr. Parkes • Subsequent sessions teacher-led • Learning melody, rhythms, pitch, cadence, tone and sequenced words • Folding squares, accompanying movement, stick or bell rhythm • Start-stop irregular sequences
Comparison Group • Twice a week group music lessons • Seasonal themes • Focus on singing, some movement • Led by Certified Music Instructor
Conceptual Model Intensive Music = Accelerated Growth Cognitive Growth CDCLR Intensive Music Program Auditory Cognitive Self-Regulation Comparison “Music As Usual” Self-Regulation Development BASELINE CURRICULUM OUTCOMES
Hypothesis 1: Children in the Intensive Music condition may show more growth in auditory and language than the Music As Usual group, relative to themselves at baseline
Hypothesis 2: Children in the Intensive Music condition will show greater gains in self-regulation than the comparison group, particularly in motor tasks.
Tasks • Cognitive • Verbal Comprehension (4 subtests) • Visual – Auditory Learning • Sound Blending • Incomplete Words Woodcock-Johnson Cognitive Tests – Ed.3
Tasks • Self-Regulation • Day/Night (cognitive inhibitory control) • Tapping (gross motor inhibitory control) • Walk the Line (motor inhibitory control and activation – flexibility) • Block Tower (turn-taking) • Snack Delay (delay of gratification)
Sample • 3, 4 & 5 year olds (mean age = 48 m) • CDCLR: Girls = 16 Boys = 11 • Comparison school: Girls = 8 Boys = 5
Preliminary Results All children showed growth in • Verbal Comprehension • Sound Blending • Inhibitory Control Tapping Turn Taking Slowing walking speed
Preliminary Results • Children in the IM condition made greater gains relative to themselves: Cognitive: Visual-Auditory Learning (F = 3.018, p = .093) Self-regulation: Turn taking (F = 3.317, p = .08)
Preliminary Results Hypothesis 1: Weak support – cognitive gains appear to be relative to differences in baseline Hypothesis 2: Partial support - IM favored One area of self-regulation
Number of Cooperative Turns Number of Cooperative Turns Time1 Time 2 Improvements in Self-Regulation for the Intensive Music Condition Number of Cooperative Turns at Two Time Periods Number of Cooperative Turns 1
Caveats • Visual-Auditory Learning “catch up” • May change with age • Attrition • A few children participated minimally • Comparison group had music all year
THANK YOU • Parents • Teachers • Children • Kim Day, who collected much of the data