1 / 29

BEAL BANK DALLAS REGIONAL SCIENCE & ENGINEERING FAIR 54 th YEAR

BEAL BANK DALLAS REGIONAL SCIENCE & ENGINEERING FAIR 54 th YEAR. JUDGING ORIENTATION Organization Scoring Conduct . MICHAEL HOYE. 1. Organization. BEAL BANK 54th REGIONAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FAIR. Part of International Science & Engineering Fair (ISEF)

saad
Download Presentation

BEAL BANK DALLAS REGIONAL SCIENCE & ENGINEERING FAIR 54 th YEAR

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BEAL BANK DALLAS REGIONAL SCIENCE & ENGINEERING FAIR54th YEAR JUDGING ORIENTATION • Organization • Scoring • Conduct

  2. MICHAEL HOYE 1. Organization

  3. BEAL BANK54th REGIONAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FAIR • Part of International Science & Engineering Fair (ISEF) Millions of student projects worldwide • Our Region: 8 counties, 600 schools • 900 middle/high school students here today, won at school and district fairs. Winners go to State and International

  4. 2010 ISEF World Champion Amy Chyao From Dallas Regional Fair

  5. MAJOR SPONSORS • Beal Bank • Southern Methodist University • Fluor • Toyota

  6. TWO KINDS OF JUDGE RED RIBBONS Science CategoryJudges determine 1st, 2nd, 3rd places BLUE RIBBONS SpecialAward Judges determine donor organizations’ own prizes.

  7. ORIENTATION REDsit at table with the number on your name badge Captains take one of the packages on table BLUE sit at table with your organization’s name

  8. Special Award Judging • BLUEjudges use your own scoring criteria to determine your winners (you may wish to use ISEF scoresheets). • Submit your results to Special Award desk by 1:00 p.m (students will leave at Noon) Following slides refer to RED judgesonly

  9. PROJECT BREAKDOWN Science Categories EachRED group judge projects in one Division & Category ( sometimes two )

  10. ROUNDS ---- 9:00 am ---- More than one group Round One --- 12:00 pm ---- Round Two Captains Only --- 1:00 pm -----

  11. ROUND 1 Summary NEW THIS YEAR ! Each judge should complete a scoresheet for each project. • If possible, leave time for group discussion • Use scores as basis for discussion

  12. ROUND 1 Summary Your group picks Top Three projects plus Honorable Mentions (HM). For categories with only one judge group, rank 1-2-3 & pick up to six HMs. All Captains submit results and all scoresheets to Admin desk by Noon.

  13. ROUND 2 Summary Required if more than one judge group per category (shown on Captain’s results sheet). • Captains meet up at Admin desk, go compare projects (no interviews) • Rank 1-2-3 & select up to six Honorable Mentions in category. • Submit results to Central Admin desk by 1:00 pm

  14. MICHAEL DALY 2. Scoring

  15. DON’T SCORE Unattended projects Projects withRED dot on board label. They failed ISEF rules. However, do interview students withREDdot projects.

  16. FOLLOW ISEF CRITERIA Individual Team Creativity 30 25 Scientific Thought 30 25 (or Engineering Goals) Skill 15 12 Thoroughness 15 12 Clarity 10 10 Teamwork - 16 TOTAL 100 100

  17. SCORING • Complete a scoresheet for each project • Score on either Scientific Thought or Engineering Goals, as appropriate • Use scores as basis for discussion • Give all scoresheets to your Captain

  18. TEAM PROJECTS • Include all members in the interview to ensure each contributed to the project. • The final work should reflect the coordinated efforts of all team members. • Note different ISEF scoring UseBLUEscoresheets

  19. 3. Conduct RICHARD COHEN

  20. SENSITIVITY • Consider age and maturity. • Be aware of knowledge level. • Be respectful : please discuss, not lecture, in your interview. • This is serious competition for students

  21. Judging “DOs” • Discuss the project with the student. • Only one Judge at a project at one time • Budget 8-10 minutes for each project. • Complete notes, evaluations & scoring away from the student. • Remember your interview is a memorable experience for the student.

  22. JUDGING “DON’Ts” • Ask about parents or school • Judge someone you know • Fill out forms in front of the student • Discuss your judging process with students/parents/teachers later

  23. CAPTAINS’ RESPONSIBILITIES • Leadership, discussion, consensus building, ranking and accuracy. • Arbitrate differences of opinion. • Listen closely for public address announcements. • MAINTAIN THE TIMETABLE

  24. CAPTAINS’ RESPONSIBILITIES • Begin judging when released at 9 a.m. • Return Round 1 results and all scoresheets by Noon. • Liase with other Captains for Round 2 (if needed). Another member can sub. • Return Round 2 results by 1:00 p.m., before taking lunch.

  25. THANK YOU … and enjoy your buffet lunch….but please finish all your judging first! Projects and results on public display here today 5:00-6:30 pm

  26. QUESTIONS? DON’T MOVE YET ! • Which categories need Captains? • Which categories need more judges?

More Related