1 / 13

Module 6: Individual A rrival

Module 6: Individual A rrival. Objectives. Identify the key protection concerns of asylum-seekers who arrive individually; Identify standards for fair refugee status determination procedures. Admission to a country of asylum. States have the right to control their borders;

Download Presentation

Module 6: Individual A rrival

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Module 6:Individual Arrival

  2. Objectives • Identify the key protection concerns of asylum-seekers who arrive individually; • Identify standards for fair refugee status determination procedures.

  3. Admission to a country of asylum • States have the right to control their borders; • However, they must respect their obligations under IRL and IHRL; • Right to seek and enjoy asylum (Art. 14, IDHR); • Principle of non-refoulement (Art. 33, 1951 Refugee Convention).

  4. Asylum-seekers • Every individual refugee arriving in a country of asylum seeking refuge is first considered an asylum-seeker; • They must be given access to a fair and efficient asylum procedure; • Asylum-seekers may be as yet unrecognised refugees: refugee status is declaratory.

  5. Asylum-seekers have rights Rights are defined in international law, and states have agreed to them. States can’t punish someone for seeking asylum: Contracting States shall not impose penalties, on account of their illegal entry or presence, on refugees who… enter… their territory without authorisation, provided they present themselves without delay to the authorities...  • 1951 Refugee Convention

  6. Who is responsible? • The host government is responsible for: • Registering, conducting RSD, and documenting refugees; • Although the UNHCR may also conduct status determination under its mandate at the request of the state; • Sequence… • Registration • Formal status determination • Documentation

  7. Conditions of reception • Ability, awareness, and capacity of officials have a major impact on protection quality; • Government attitude; • Restrictive government policies; • Socio-economic factors; • Enabling legislation; • Prevailing public opinion towards asylum-seekers.

  8. All refugees need: • Information on asylum procedure; • Legal advice; • Attendance in their mother tongue; • Food, clothing, and safe accommodation; • Financial assistance; • Medical assistance and emotional support; • Access: NGOs, the UNHCR, family, and other support networks; • Focus on capacities.

  9. Screening for special protection needs Immediate family tracing in case of separation Treatment for trauma in cases of sexual violence Immediate reproductive health care Attendance by female officials Children Elderly Primary education Restoration of routine Emotional security Officials trained in child protection Women Attention to specific medical needs Access to other extended family or community members Special protection needs on arrival

  10. Refugee status determination (RSD) Procedures vary from one country to another depending on resources, local traditions, etc. • Advice and information; • Right to counsel, competent interpreters; • Fair and expeditious; • Independent, impartial, competent adjudicator; • Right to independent appeal.

  11. Lawful detention Is a last resort • Any detention of an asylum-seeker should be for the briefest period possible; • Any detention must be subject to judicial control; • Children should never be detained; • Limited to: verify identity; determine preliminary facts, not substantive facts; if proves serious risk to national security. Asylum-seekers are not criminals

  12. Case study questions • Outline the protection issues arising in this case; • How could the RSD procedure be improved in the state? • How might your organisation contribute to improving this situation?

  13. Best practice for states • Respect for rights and human dignity; • Appropriate range& standard of assistance; • Clear, effecient, and effective RSD procedures; • Facilitation of self-reliance for asylum-seekers; • Proactive management public opinion; • Burden-sharing with other states; • Gendersensitivity in all interventions (incl. RSD), and awareness of special protectionissues for childrenand the elderly.

More Related