1 / 23

Teacher Evaluation System

Teacher Evaluation System. Administrator Training June 5 & 6, 2012. AGENDA. DAY 1 Technology Tool Development Best Practice & State Update Intro. To Tech Tool Setting Up Local District Tool (work time) DAY 2 Sharing Of Local Tools OR Work Time Practice Using Tool With Teacher Videos.

remedios-dudley
Download Presentation

Teacher Evaluation System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Teacher Evaluation System Administrator Training June 5 & 6, 2012

  2. AGENDA DAY 1 Technology Tool Development Best Practice & State Update Intro. To Tech Tool Setting Up Local District Tool (work time) DAY 2 Sharing Of Local Tools OR Work Time Practice Using Tool With Teacher Videos

  3. Nebraska Teacher Standards Performance Framework • 40 Committee Members from State Educational Stakeholder Groups • Used National Standards and The Framework for Teaching by Charlotte Danielson • State Board of Education adopted the Teacher Performance Framework in Nov. • Intended as best practice - not mandated http://www.education.ne.gov/

  4. Where Have We Been? After meeting last summer, Administrators indicated they….. • Want an evaluation tool based on the Nebraska Teacher “Standards” • Want a tool used to help teachers improve • Would like it to be a mobile, electronic tool • Want to work collaboratively

  5. What Does The Tool Look Like? • Mobile Device For Walk-Throughs • Data Feeds Formal Evaluation Form • Printable Reports/Evaluation Forms • Levels of Access Determine Views

  6. Associated Fees • Required: Administrator Trainings • 2012-13 FREE to all ESU 10 Schools (Pilot Year) • Advisory Committee 2012-13 For Improvements to the System • Beginning 2013-14 • $100 Annual Maintenance Fee, plus $10 per certified teacher • Non ESU 10 Schools $100 Annual Maintenance Fee, plus $20 per certified teacher

  7. Growth Model Key Elements • Teacher Reflection • Formal/Informal Feedback • Goal setting • Plan to address needs Measuring Teacher Growth

  8. Determination of Performance Levels Developing = “Non-Negotiable” Developing/Unsatisfactory Levels to Satisfy “Met” & “Not Met”

  9. Rubric Development Based on the language of the Performance Framework Effective Practices & Indicators See Handout

  10. Identify Evidence of Effective Practice See Handout “What does this look like in the classroom?”

  11. Informing the Tech Tool

  12. ESU 10 ODIE System The evaluation tool will be managed through our ODIE system which will enable schools to build the tool and set levels of access.

  13. Using the DATA Collected • What does the data tell us? • How will we use the data? • How can the data inform our Professional Development plan? School Improvement? • How can the data help us help teachers?

  14. ESU 10’s Role • Facilitation of the creation of the tool • Professional development in the use & understanding of the tool/process • Management of the technology • ESU wide reports for the purpose of identifying needs & designing aligned PD • Assisting schools in prioritizing local PD needs

  15. Statewide Leadership CommitteeTask from State Board of Education Develop teacher and principal evaluation models based on the Nebraska Teacher and Principal Performance Framework for voluntaryuse by local districts.

  16. StateModel Development Groups • Design/Pilot District Committees- To design specific instruments, oversee training and implementation. Includes pilot districts (@25), selected ESU staff developers and tech coordinators. Begin meeting in Fall 2012 • Rubric Committee- Drawn from Framework Drafting Committee; will draft summative rubrics for Framework, June 25-26 • ESU’s- Training and staff development and possible development of evaluation technology • Vendors- Provide expertise and other products and services as process develops.

  17. Best Practice • There are common best practice elements for teacher evaluation regardless of the model • Growth-oriented practices such as teacher: • Self-reflection • Goal setting • Professional growth plans

  18. Possible Model Products: Toolkit • Model Board policy/admin. Regulation • Observation instruments & rubrics • Summative evaluation documents/rubrics • Guidelines for using student learning in evaluation • Feedback surveys & related materials • Training & implementation guides • Professional development resources • Technological resources

  19. Initial Planning Timeline • Phase I- Leadership-Steering Committee: Spring, Summer, Fall, 2012 • Phase II- Design/Training Process: 2012-2013 • Phase III- Pilot School Implementation in 2013-2014 • Phase IV- Full Implementation (All Schools): 2014-2015

  20. Time to Tour the System

  21. Setting Up Your Local Tool

  22. Next Steps • Complete building your local tool • Pilot the tool in 2012-13 • Advisory committee to adopt improvements as the State recommendations come forth & participating schools identify need areas IF you decide to use this as a formal tool, you must first: • Local Board approval of the new tool • Submit to State for approval • Teacher awareness training

  23. Questions? Kelly Clapp kelly.clapp@esu10.org Denise O’Brien dobrien@esu10.org Nate McClenahan nmcclena@esu10.org

More Related