1 / 27

An Introduction to Scientific Research Methods in Geography Chapter 6 Explicit Reports

An Introduction to Scientific Research Methods in Geography Chapter 6 Explicit Reports. What is an explicit report?. Measures of beliefs people have about all sorts of things, including themselves or other people, places or events, activities or objects

Download Presentation

An Introduction to Scientific Research Methods in Geography Chapter 6 Explicit Reports

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. An Introduction to Scientific Research Methods in Geography Chapter 6 Explicit Reports

  2. What is an explicit report? • Measures of beliefs people have about all sorts of things, including themselves or other people, places or events, activities or objects • Can request many different types of beliefs: behaviors, knowledge, opinions, attitudes, expectations, intentions, experiences, and demographic characteristics

  3. What is an explicit report? • The defining characteristic is their explicitness • People know they are providing information • Cannot be judged as right or wrong • Can be characterized as common or unusual or related to variables such as demographics

  4. Types of Explicit Reports • Surveys • Interviews • Sociometric ratings • Activity diaries/logs • Contingent valuation • Focus groups • Protocol analyses • Tests

  5. Format of Explicit Reports • A specific survey or interview is called an instrument • The specific questions or statements that make it up are called items • Closed-ended items provide a finite number of specific response options • Open-ended items do not provide specific response options for respondents

  6. Format of Explicit Reports • Standardized items are presented in a predetermined and consistent format to all respondents • Nonstandardized items are not consistent across respondents • Follow up questions are nonstandardized • Branching format • Free-format

  7. Closed-ended items • Should provide exhaustive alternatives • Should usually provide mutually exclusive alternatives • Providing an “other” alternative can make it somewhat more open-ended • “Don't know” and “no opinion” avoid forced responses

  8. Rating Scales • Respondents provide a number or mark a line to indicate the amount or extent of something, including the degree of belief they have in something • Semantic differential • Likert scales • Paired comparison ratings

  9. Rating Scale Design Issues • How many scale options to provide? • Generally, 5 to 9 for adults, usually an odd # • Measurement level – treat as ordinal • Only non-parametric ordinal stats can be used • Measurement level – treat as interval • Used by many researchers • Believe people treat equally spaced scale intervals as approximately equally spaced • Better for visually/numerically spaced values

  10. Administration of Explicit Reports • Can be self or researcher-administered • Individually or in groups • In person, through the mail, over the phone, or on the internet • Interviews could be done with a computer program or recorded with audio or video

  11. Administration of Explicit Reports • 1. Cost – Can vary greatly, in money, time and effort, by administration • Interviewing more costly than surveys • 2. Number and nature of items – surveys can contain more items and more complex items than interviews • Complex interviews can be too difficult • Surveys provide more anonymity and can increase honesty

  12. Administration of Explicit Reports • 3. Response rate – in-person requests for participation are most effective but are costly • People tend to ignore mail and e-mail surveys and become frustrated with phone calls • 4. Potential for follow-up

  13. Administration of Explicit Reports • 5. Nature of respondents – different types of respondents differ in their ability to handle different administration methods and questions • Example: revealing some info to a non-present researcher can be strange and not work • 6. Possible interview artifacts – the appearance, demographic characteristics, or personal style of the researchers can affect responses

  14. Using the Internet to Collect Explicit Reports • Major benefit is the efficiency and low cost • Can reach many, many people for very cheap • Are stored in digital form and analyzed automatically • Branching-format follow-up questions possible • However, there is concern about the presence of sampling bias

  15. Other Difficulties with Internet Research • Repeated participation • Does not occur commonly and can be avoided • Respondents may take studies less seriously and provide frivolous responses • Research indicates that internet results are similar to traditional studies • Privacy issues – obtaining informed consent

  16. Design and Generation • Use existing literature to generate items • Conduct one or more open-ended, unstructured interviews to generate ideas • Construction of items is important in how respondents understand and respond to them • Should avoid confusing, biased, and ambiguous wording • Items should be unidimensional

  17. Design and Generation • Should be visually easy to understand and use • Should be long enough to obtain the information you need, but not longer than that • Order effects – potential influence on responses to particular items that arise due to the order the item was presented • A context effect may arise because of the context created by the order of items • The optimal solution is counterbalancing

  18. GPM...PMT • Generate, pretest, modify...pretest, modify, test • 1st generate items to tap into your constructs of interest, then pretest the first draft • May pretest with friends or colleagues, but should also pretest with a small sample of the type of respondents you will use for real data • Also ask them how they interpret items, instructions, etc. • Then modify the instrument, pretest it, and modify again as many times as is necessary

  19. The Census • A count of the number of people in a country & an assessment of their characteristics, such as family structure, economic activities, etc. • Secondary data source • U.S. constitution mandates a census – 10 years • American Community Survey – 1% of the population • U.S. census is neither de facto or de jure, but counts people at their “usual residence,” legal or not • What kind of problems might this create for geographers?

  20. Counting issues • Accepted that the U.S. census is an undercount • Some are overcounted and others under, but the net result is an undercount • Illegal immigrants, those without permanent residences, and those of lower socioeconomic status in inner cities may be undercounted • Students and those with multiple residences may be counted twice

  21. Census Units • Census data are aggregated to spatial units designed to ensure the privacy of individual respondents • The entire U.S., regions, divisions, states, counties, county subdivisions, census places, census tracts, block groups, and blocks are the basic units • Change somewhat from census to census, especially at smaller units

  22. Where do I find it?

  23. Limitations of Explicit Reports • Some basic limitations include: • Respondents may give socially desirable responses - called response sets • Respondents may attempt to damage the efforts of the researcher • Interviewers can distort results • Memory can be a limitation • Keep the time frame short and recent

  24. Limitations of Explicit Reports • Language is another limitation • Not all meaning and experience can be verbally expressed • Language expresses meaning in a profoundly contextual way • Altering the wording of items can produce different responses

  25. Limitations of Explicit Reports • Explicit reports require respondents to access their mental states and externalize them but this is complicated • “What” questions are easier than “why” questions to answer • We don't do what we do because of what we believe • Cultural norms and expectations, habits, action opportunities and constraints, personal gain or loss, past experience, and belief that one's actions are public or anonymous factor in too

  26. Review Questions • How do closed-ended and open-ended items differ and what are some strengths/weaknesses of each? • What issues need to be considered when deciding how to administer explicit reports? • What are some desirable characteristics of explicit report items? • What are strengths/weaknesses of the U.S. census as a source of data for scientific research?

More Related