slide1 l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 53
rance

Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

116 Views
Download Presentation
Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress
An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress

  2. Idaho Reading Indicator (IRI) • Grades K-3. • Individual reading test administered three times/year. • 2007-2008 was a new test and is a new baseline • Scores: 3 – Benchmark 2 – Strategic 1 – Intensive • On Target: • Reach the Spring Benchmark or • Increase the percentage of students meeting Benchmark (3) by 5% from Fall to Spring.

  3. Kindergarten 13 out of 14 schools met the Benchmark for Kindergarten.

  4. First Grade 12 out of 14 schools met the Benchmark for first grade.

  5. Second Grade 9 out of 14 schools have met the Benchmark for second grade.

  6. Third Grade 12 out of 14 schools have met the Benchmark for third grade.

  7. Idaho Standards Achievement Test (ISAT) • Reading, language usage, math in grades 3 through 8 and 10. • 2007-2008 Fall & Spring – 2008-2009 Spring only. • Science in grades 5, 7, & 10. • Given on computer. • Used to measure adequate yearly progress (AYP) in the spring. • Passing score required for graduation. • Retest opportunity offered four times each year.

  8. ISAT DATA The first set of graphs show: • The percent of students proficient in grades 3-8 & 10, state and district longitudinal data, based on the NCLB items from the ISAT.

  9. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from the ISAT Spring 2004-2008 3rd Grade

  10. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from the ISAT Spring 2004-2008 4th Grade

  11. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from the ISAT Spring 2005-2008 5th Grade

  12. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from the ISAT Spring 2005-2008 6th Grade

  13. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from the ISAT Spring 2004-2008 7th Grade

  14. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from the ISAT Spring 2004-2008 8th Grade

  15. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from the ISAT Spring 2004-2008 10th Grade

  16. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from the ISAT Spring 2007-2008 Science

  17. ISAT DATA The next set of graphs show: • The percent of students proficient in grades 3-8 & 10, Spring 2008 school data, based on the NCLB items from the ISAT.

  18. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from the ISAT Spring 2008 3rd Grade

  19. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from theISAT Spring 2008 4th Grade

  20. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from theISAT Spring 2008 5th Grade

  21. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from theISAT Spring 2008 6th Grade

  22. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from theISAT Spring 2008 7th Grade

  23. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from theISAT Spring 2008 8th Grade

  24. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from theISAT Spring 2008 10th Grade

  25. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from theISAT Spring 2008 Science

  26. ISAT DATA The next set of graphs show: • The percent of students proficient in grades 3-8 & 10 based on AYP calculations from the ISAT by sub-groups.

  27. Percent Proficient by Ethnicity

  28. Percent Proficient by Ethnicity

  29. Percent Proficient by Special Programs

  30. Percent Proficient by Special Programs

  31. NCLB and AYP The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act requires that all: • students meet the standards for reading and math by 2014. • schools demonstrate adequate yearly progress (AYP) toward achieving that goal.

  32. NCLB and AYP Each state has set incremental benchmarks to reach 100% proficiency by 2014. • Math requirement: • 2006-2008: 70% students proficient • 2008-2009: 70% students proficient • 2009-2010: 80% students proficient • Reading requirement: • 2006-2008: 78% students proficient • 2008-2009: 78% students proficient • 2009-2010: 85% students proficient

  33. AYP Incremental Benchmarks

  34. NCLB and AYP Facts • Sixth year held accountable for No Child Left Behind • (NCLB) / Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). • 41 targets to meet proficiency benchmarks. • Entire student population – or any one of the subgroups – • does not meet targets, school is deemed not to have made • AYP. • AYP is only one measure of a school’s success.

  35. School AYP Accountability

  36. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District AYP Status • Eight of thirteen elementary schools met AYP. • One elementary school is on alert. • Seven elementary schools are in School • Improvement. • All middle schools are in School Improvement. • Two of four high schools met AYP. • All high schools are in School Improvement.

  37. Elementary Schools that Met AYP (and are not in School Improvement) • Chubbuck Elementary • Ellis Elementary • Gate City Elementary • Greenacres Elementary • Tendoy Elementary

  38. Elementary Schools that Met AYP (but are still in School Improvement) • Indian Hills Elementary • Improvement 2 Reading • Tyhee Elementary • Improvement 2 Reading • Washington Elementary • Improvement 1 Reading

  39. Elementary School On Alert • Edahow Elementary – Alert Reading • Economically Disadvantaged Reading Proficiency (75.51%) Elementary Schools in School Improvement 1 • Lewis & Clark Elementary School – Improvement 1 3rd Indicator • – Language, Improvement 1 Reading, Improvement 1 Math • Total Population Language Proficiency (69.32%) • Economically Disadvantaged Reading Proficiency (72.88%) • Economically Disadvantaged Math Proficiency (68.36%) • Syringa Elementary School – Improvement 1 Math • Economically Disadvantaged Math Proficiency (68.5%)

  40. Elementary School in School Improvement 2 • Jefferson Elementary School – Improvement 2 Reading, • Improvement 1 Math • Economically Disadvantaged Reading Proficiency (77.16%) • Students With Disabilities Reading Proficiency (25.58%) • Students With Disabilities Math Proficiency (44.19%) Elementary School in School Improvement 3 • Wilcox Elementary School – Improvement 3 Reading • Hispanic Reading Proficiency (72.97%) • Economically Disadvantaged Reading Proficiency (71.76%) • Students With Disabilities Reading Proficiency (52%)

  41. Middle School in School Improvement 2 • Franklin Middle School – Improvement 2 Reading, Improvement • 2 Math, Improvement 1 3rd Indicator-Language • Economically Disadvantaged Reading Proficiency (72.41%) • Students with Disabilities Reading Proficiency (50%) • Total Population Language Proficiency (73.24%) • Economically Disadvantaged Math Proficiency (54.6%) • Students with Disabilities Math Proficiency (30.36%) • (missed safe harbor because of SWD Language Proficiency)

  42. Middle Schools in School Improvement 3 • Hawthorne Middle School – Improvement 3 Reading, • Improvement 3 Math • American Indian Reading Proficiency (57.58%) • Economically Disadvantaged Reading Proficiency (75.24%) • Students with Disabilities Reading Proficiency (26.32%) • Students with Disabilities Math Proficiency (17.54%) • Kinport Academy – Improvement 3 Reading, Improvement 3 • Math • Total Population Reading Proficiency (41.67%) • Total Population Math Proficiency (33.33%)

  43. Middle School in School Improvement 5 • Irving Middle School – Improvement 3 Reading, Improvement 5 • Math • Students with Disabilities Reading Proficiency (57.58%) • Hispanic Math Proficiency (67.5%) • (missed Safe Harbor because of Hispanic Language Proficiency)

  44. High Schools that Met AYP (but are still in School Improvement) • Century High School • Improvement 1 3rd Indicator – Graduation Rate, • Improvement 1 Reading, Improvement 2 Math • New Horizons High School • Improvement 2 Reading, Improvement 2 Math

  45. High Schools in School Improvement • Highland High School – Improvement 1 Math • Economically Disadvantaged Math Proficiency (59.26%) • Pocatello High School – Improvement 1 Math • Total Population Math Proficiency (65.97%) • White Math Proficiency (66%)

  46. District AYP Accountability

  47. District Classified in Improvement • Improvement 1 3rd Indicator-Graduation Rate, Improvement 3 Reading, Improvement 1 Math • LEP Reading Proficiency (54.55%) • (missed Safe Harbor because of LEP Language Proficiency) • Students with Disabilities Reading Proficiency (46.88%) • LEP Math Proficiency (56.82%) • Students with Disabilities Math Proficiency (42.37%)

  48. What Plans Are Being Made for Improvement? • Implement Total Instructional Alignment • Implement Professional Learning Communities • Continue to expand ‘Response to Intervention’ (RtI) model • Continue to expand and offer interventions • Continued use of Instructional Reading & Math Coaches • Strengthen the District’s Professional Development Offerings • Effective Instructional Strategies • Highly Effective Questioning • Framework for Understanding Poverty • Cultural Competency Training • Love & Logic • Reach Out • Continue to focus improvement efforts through the School Improvement planning process (Effective Schools Research) • High School / Middle School Redesign • After school English and math help sessions for middle school • After school math help sessions for high school • Continued use of Academic Success Coaches

  49. CELEBRATE! *We are continuing to Maximize Student Learning* • AYP is one indicator of school success. • The Pocatello/Chubbuck School District was selected for the “What Parents Want” award by School Match • Based on: • competitive test scores • accreditation • recognition for excellence by a national foundation • competitive teacher salaries • average instructional expenditures • library/media services • class size • Only 16% of the nation’s school districts have received this recognition