1 / 18

Theory of Mind in Humans & Primates

Theory of Mind in Humans & Primates. Yee-Ann Soong and Bob Same. False Belief Tasks. Children begin to conceptualize thought ~4 or 5 years old Seems to be a link between language and ability to conceptualize thought What about primates? Predictions:

quyn-gray
Download Presentation

Theory of Mind in Humans & Primates

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Theory of Mind in Humans & Primates Yee-Ann Soong and Bob Same

  2. False Belief Tasks • Children begin to conceptualize thought • ~4 or 5 years old • Seems to be a link between language and ability to conceptualize thought • What about primates? • Predictions: • If language is important, they will fail the false belief test • If language is not important, they will pass

  3. Previous Studies • Woodruff & Premack (1979) • Used two different trainers • One would locate the food and give it to the primate • Other would locate the food and eat it himself • Can primates understand the intentions of the trainers? • Took many trials for primates to master the task Simply learning how to get the food?

  4. Previous Studies • Povinelli, Nelson & Boysen (1990) • Can primates distinguish a knowledgeable vs. ignorant human? • Tested primates with trainers who had/had not seen a hiding event • Took many trials for primates to master the task Simply learning how to get the food? *Couldn’t replicate results using younger chimps in 1994

  5. Comparing Humans to Apes • Must be nonverbal

  6. Experimental Setup A B

  7. Experimental Conditions • Understanding of task • 3 control tests • 1. Visible Displacement • 2. Invisible Displacement • 3. Ignore Communicator • Mastery of all 3 control tests is necessary for passing the false belief task (and a requirement for participation)

  8. Results: Children & Control Tests

  9. Results: Children and False Belief

  10. Interpretation • Most 4 and 5 year olds can pass the control tests • Most 5 year olds clearly pass the false belief test • Ability increases with age!

  11. ToM – Ability and Age

  12. Testing Primates

  13. Modified Tests • Instead of removing the marker after 1-2 s, the marker was left on the box • How do you know that the ape isn’t just equating the marker with food? • Answer: Invisible displacement non-marker test (where there was no marker)

  14. Results: Primates and Control Tests

  15. Results: Primates and False Belief *Total 4 trials

  16. Theory of Mind • Follow up tests ensure that the Primates still understood the control tasks • Primates failed the false belief test regardless of age • Primates failed differently from 4 year olds • Primates knew the answer: the wrong one! • 4 year olds were guessing • (Not overwhelmingly choosing the wrong answer)

  17. Comparison: Humans and Primates

  18. Conclusion? “Apes do not have a ‘theory of mind’ in the sense of understanding the false beliefs of others.” -Call & Tomasello • Are all apes created equal? • Is the task too hard?

More Related