slide1 n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
A Review of International Shared Service Centre/BPO Locations (Based on information from the Financial Times fDi Benchm PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
A Review of International Shared Service Centre/BPO Locations (Based on information from the Financial Times fDi Benchm

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 21

A Review of International Shared Service Centre/BPO Locations (Based on information from the Financial Times fDi Benchm - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 122 Views
  • Uploaded on

A Review of International Shared Service Centre/BPO Locations (Based on information from the Financial Times fDi Benchmark tool, April 2012). Project Profile Overview.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'A Review of International Shared Service Centre/BPO Locations (Based on information from the Financial Times fDi Benchm' - quincy


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

A Review of International Shared Service Centre/BPO Locations(Based on information from the Financial Times fDi Benchmark tool, April 2012)

project profile overview
Project Profile Overview

Scottish Development International have produced this scenario based project with independent input from the Financial Services fDi Benchmark tool. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the Scottish Central Belt’s capability benchmarked against other worldwide shared service centres/BPO. The project parameters are as follows:

• Project Profile: Shared service centre/BPO

• Benchmark Level: City Level

• Total Head Count: 200

• Benchmark Locations: Barcelona, Boston, Brussels, Chicago, Dublin, Houston, London, Los Angeles, New York City, Prague, San Francisco, the Scottish Central Belt, Seattle, Stockholm, and New Delhi

• Currency: GBP - United Kingdom Pound

fdi benchmark matrix

The fDi Benchmark Matrix shows the trade off between cost and quality across the 15 selected locations for the shared service centre/BPO profile. The average cost and quality score is 100 for the selected locations.

fDi Benchmark Matrix

Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd

fdi benchmark matrix1
fDi Benchmark Matrix

The matrix is based on the weighting and cost model for the shared service centre/BPO profile. The weighting model identifies the key location criteria for the project and the cost model shows the primary cost inputs for the operation. The cost and quality scores are calculated using real data on all the location requirements and cost inputs.

The results indicate the different location solutions for the investor as follows:

  • Dublin, Prague, Los Angeles, the Scottish Central Belt and New Delhi offer the highest quality at the lowest cost than the average of all the selected locations
  • Brussels, London, and New York City offer higher quality but at the highest cost
  • Barcelona, Houston, Chicago and Stockholm offer the lowest cost, but at the lowest quality

(The Operating Cost value is in GBP - United Kingdom Pound)

Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd

location attractiveness index

The location attractiveness index shows the overall attractiveness of the 15 selected locations for the shared service centre/BPO profile. The ratio of quality to cost is 50:50

Location Attractiveness Index

Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd

cost quality competitiveness

The cost quality competitiveness uses the results of the independent fDi Benchmark Matrix to show the ‘Value for Money’ of each location option. The graph shows that:

    • The top locations offering the highest quality for a given level of cost are the Scottish Central Belt, New Delhi, and Prague
    • New Delhi, the Scottish Central Belt and Prague offer an above average level of quality and good value for money as there relative quality is higher than their relative cost.
Cost Quality Competitiveness

Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd

cost competitiveness
Cost Competitiveness
  • The annual operating cost calculation for shared service centre/BPO project is based on the following primary input costs:
  • Labour Cost, Property and Telecoms
  • The average cost across the selected locations for shared services centre/BPO is GBP 8,755,827
  • The greatest cost saving between the selected locations is GBP 8,805,715 per annum

Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd

cost competitiveness1
Cost Competitiveness
  • The locations with the lowest operating costs are New Delhi, Krakow and Prague.
  • In terms of the individual cost factors, the locations with the lowest costs are:
  • Labour Cost: the Scottish Central Belt, New Delhi, and Prague
  • Property: Prague, Seattle and Los Angeles
  • Telecoms: Stockholm, Seattle and Los Angeles
  • (The values in the table below are in GBP - United Kingdom Pound)

Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd

quality competitiveness
Quality Competitiveness
  • The quality competitiveness assessment is based on the weight model for the shared service centre/BPO profile which assesses each location across the following location factors:
  • General Business Environment, Labour Availability and Quality, Presence of an Industrial Cluster, Infrastructure and Accessibility and Living Environment.
  • The average score for the selected locations is 100.
  • The locations with the highest quality scores are New York City, London and the Scottish Central Belt

Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd

quality competitiveness1

In terms of the individual quality factors, the locations with the highest scores are:

    • General Business Environment: the Scottish Central Belt, London and Dublin
    • Labour Availability and Quality: New York City, London and Los Angeles
    • Presence of an Industrial Cluster: the Scottish Central Belt, Dublin and Prague
    • Infrastructure and Accessibility: London, Stockholm and Brussels
    • Living Environment: Chicago, Houston and New Dehli
Quality Competitiveness

Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd

general business environment
General Business Environment

The quality competitiveness breakdown for general business environment for the shared service centre/BPO profile is shown below:

The locations with the highest overall scores for General Business Environment are the Scottish Central Belt, Dublin and London

Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd

general business environment1

In terms of the individual quality criteria within General Business Environment, the locations with the highest scores are:

    • Economic growth and stability: Los Angeles, London and New York City
    • Operating risk: the Scottish Central Belt, London and New Delhi
    • Taxation and incentives: Dublin, Houston and Seattle
    • Access to finance: Stockholm, Houston and Seattle
    • Regulatory environment: Stockholm, Dublin and the Scottish Central Belt
General Business Environment

Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd

labour availability and quality

The quality competitiveness breakdown for Labour Availability and Quality for the shared service centre/BPO profile is shown below:

The locations with the highest overall scores for Labour Availability and Quality are New York City, London and Los Angeles

Labour Availability and Quality

Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd

labour availability and quality1

In terms of the individual quality criteria within Labour Availability and Quality, the locations with the highest scores are:

    • Overall size of labour market: New York City, New Delhi and Los Angeles
    • Tightness and competition for labour: Brussels, Barcelona and Dublin
    • Experienced industry-specific staff: New York City, London and New Delhi
    • Non-experienced staff: Stockholm, New York City, Los Angeles and Chicago
    • Flexibility of labour regulations: New York City, Los Angeles and Chicago
Labour Availability and Quality

Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd

presence of an industrial cluster

The quality competitiveness breakdown for Presence of an Industrial Cluster for the shared service centre/BPO profile is shown below:

The locations with the highest overall scores for Presence of an Industrial Cluster are Prague, Dublin and the Scottish Central Belt

Presence of an Industrial Cluster

Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd

presence of an industrial cluster1

In terms of the individual quality criteria within Presence of an Industrial Cluster, the locations with the highest scores are:

    • Industry specialisation: Brussels, Barcelona and Houston
    • Size of industry: Brussels, New Delhi and Barcelona
    • Track record: Prague, Dublin and the Scottish Central Belt
    • Export competitiveness: the Scottish Central Belt, London and Dublin
Presence of an Industrial Cluster

Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd

infrastructure and accessibility
Infrastructure and Accessibility

The quality competitiveness breakdown for Infrastructure and Accessibility for the shared service centre/BPO profile is shown below:

The locations with the highest overall scores for Infrastructure and Accessibility are London, Stockholm and Brussels

Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd

infrastructure and accessibility1

In terms of the individual quality criteria within Infrastructure and Accessibility, the locations with the highest scores are:

    • Access to major overseas markets: London, Brussels and Barcelona
    • Quality of local infrastructure: New Delhi, New York City and Boston
    • Quality of utilities: Brussels, Prague and Barcelona
    • Quality of ICT infrastructure: Stockholm, Prague and Seattle
Infrastructure and Accessibility

Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd

living environment

The quality competitiveness breakdown for Living Environment for the shared service centre/BPO profile is shown below:

The locations with the highest overall scores for Living Environment are Chicago, Houston and New Delhi

Living Environment

Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd

living environment1

In terms of the individual quality criteria within Living Environment, the locations with the highest scores are:

    • Cost of living: New Delhi, Houston and Prague
    • Attractiveness for international staff: Chicago, London and Houston
Living Environment

Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd

slide21

To realise the potential,please contact:

Scottish Development International

150 Broomielaw, Atlantic Quay

Glasgow G2 8LU

Scotland, UK

T +44 141 228 2828

F +44 141 228 2089

www.sdi.co.uk

Worldwide offices in: Americas, Europe, Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific