1 / 22

Oregon Framework

Oregon’s Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Presented by: ODE, OEA and Chalkboard. Oregon Framework. Overview. Principles and Vision of a Quality System Collaboration Purpose of System SB 290, ESEA Waiver & Process

prisca
Download Presentation

Oregon Framework

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Oregon’s Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support SystemsPresented by:ODE, OEA and Chalkboard Oregon Framework

  2. Overview • Principles and Vision of a Quality System • Collaboration • Purpose of System • SB 290, ESEA Waiver & Process • Oregon’s Framework Required Elements Oregon Framework

  3. Vision and Principles Center for Great Public Schools • Vision and Principles of a Quality System • Vision: This is a transformative professional growth system -Values have shifted from just making contract renewal decisions to elevating leading, teaching and learning. -To nurture a culture of continuous improvement and growth by including formative assessment & support. -To create alignment between evaluation and professional learning that adds value to the system • Principles: -Designed collaboratively -Research-based, best practice Oregon Framework

  4. Collaboration Center for Great Public Schools • Collaboration in Design of a System • Collaboration is a multi-stakeholder investment that leads to a shift in culture: • Equal voice is paramount, • Accountability to the goals and mission of the collaborative team. • School district collaborative evaluation team is charged with the design and implementation of a professional growth plan that includes: • Best practice exemplars that meet the Oregon Framework requirements. • A multi-year implementation process driven by professional development with a thorough assessment and continuous improvement of the evaluation system. • A primary focus on professional growth, providing a safe environment for practitioners to take risks, reflect, learn and grow. Oregon Framework

  5. Purpose of System Center for Great Public Schools • Purpose of a Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support System • Primary purpose is to support the learning and growth of all practitioners -Regardless of where a teacher or administrator is on the rubric -Requires an environment where safety is paramount so learners (teachers and admin) can take risks to push their development • A focus on growth requires time and resources -Opportunities to collaborate with colleagues and peers -Opportunities to reflect on practice, try new strategies, evaluate their effectiveness, then collaborate to configure next steps Oregon Framework

  6. SB 290 & ESEA Waiver Center for Great Public Schools • Teacher and Administrator Evaluation • Senate Bill 290 (2011) -Evaluation systems collaboratively designed with teachers, administrators, and exclusive bargaining representative -Aligned to model core teaching standards and Oregon leadership/admin standards - Multiple-measures • ESEA-No Child Left Behind Waiver (2012) - -Consensus evaluation Oregon Framework - Student growth as a “significant factor” -2012-2013 pilot year Oregon Framework

  7. Oregon’s Waiver & Evaluation Center for Great Public Schools • ESEA Waiver • Every evaluation in Oregon must include multiple, valid measures tied to established standards of practice • Prohibits evaluations based solely on standardized tests. Requires multiple, valid measures of student learning when student growth is considered in an evaluation • Requires districts to provide teachers and admin the opportunity to set their own student learning goals • Local association and district determine measures in evaluation system consistent with SB 290 • Oregon’s Waiver does not require school districts to set an arbitrary percentage weight for student growth in individual teacher evaluations Oregon Framework

  8. Pilot School Districts • Part of this step will be decided by the ODE/OEA pilots • SB 252 • Ashland Lebanon Lincoln County • McMinnville Oregon City Pendleton • Redmond Sherwood Sisters • South Lane Springfield Vernonia • OEA • Beaverton SD • North Clackamas SD Oregon Framework

  9. Framework Required Elements • Teacher and Administrator Evaluation All district teacher and administrator evaluation and support systems in Oregon must include the following six elements: Oregon Framework

  10. (1) Standards of Practice • Model Core Teaching Standards • Interstate Teacher Assessment & Support Consortium (InTASC) • Educational Leadership/Administrator Standards • Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) • Compliance examples: • Handbook recognizes InTASC/ISLLC as standards • Crosswalk from your standards to the InTASC/ISLLC standards • OSBA Policy showing adoption of InTASC, ISLLC Oregon Framework

  11. (2) Differentiated Performance Levels • Teacher and administrator performance assessed on the Standards of Professional Practice on four levels: • Level 1 – Does not meet standards • Level 2 – Making progress toward standards • Level 3 – Meets standards • Level 4 – Exceeds standards • Rubrics describe performance at each level • Guides individuals toward improving their practice at the next performance level Oregon Framework

  12. (2) Differentiated Performance Levels • Compliance examples: • Adopt an ODE recommended rubrics • TeachersAdministrators • Danielson Salem-Keizer’s Admin Assessment & Eval • Marshall Oregon Educational Leadership/Admin • Marzano Pendleton • Salem-Keizer’s LEGENDS • Develop or keep your own rubric • Perform Gap Analysis for ODE Oregon Framework

  13. (3) Multiple Measures Oregon teacher & admin evaluations must include at least TWO measures from each of the three categories of evidence: ESEA Waiver Update Oregon Framework

  14. (3) Multiple Measures Oregon Framework • (A) Professional Practice • Compliance examples – at minimum, you must have: • Observation • Artifact analysis • (B) Professional Responsibilities • Compliance examples – could include: • Professional goals/plan • Self-assessment/evaluation • Participation/reflection in PLC or PLC goals contribution

  15. (3) Multiple Measures • (C) Student Learning and Growth • Compliance examples – at minimum, you must have: • Two Student Learning and Growth Goals • Based on multiple measures of student learning • Teachers: • If you are ELA/Math, Grades 3-8 & 11 • 1 of your 2 goals must use OAKS data • Your other goal must have measures from category2 or 3 • If you are not ELA/Math Grades 3-8 & 11 • Your goals must include student learning measures from two of the three categories • Admin: • One goal must use OAKS data • Building-level data in reading and math, including all subgroups • Should align to Achievement Compact goals where applicable Oregon Framework

  16. (3) Student Learning Measures Measures of student learning and growth include three types of measures: Oregon Framework

  17. (4) Evaluation & Professional Growth Oregon Framework • Compliance examples: • Frequency of Evaluations • Probationary teachers & non-contract administrators – every years • Contract teachers & administrators – at least every two years

  18. (4) Evaluation & Professional Growth Critical components in the cycle Collaborative process, ongoing feedback, focus on improving effectiveness Oregon Framework

  19. (5) Aligned to Professional Learning Oregon Framework • Goal is to improve professional practice • Evaluations inform educators of strengths & weaknesses • Make informed decisions for professional growth • Professional learning relevant to educator’s goals & needs • Help all levels grow/learn • Goal is to meet standards • Don’t live in 4 – “visit” 2 & 4 as learners and growers • Learning Forward standards: • www.learningforward.org/standards/standards.cfm

  20. (6) Plan for Implementation & Training Oregon Framework • Must provide a plan for how the new system will be implemented, including training: • Staff being evaluated on the new system • Evaluators utilizing the new system to evaluate staff • Inter-rater reliability • Calibration • It is vital that this plan is collaboratively developed

  21. Oregon’s Framework Implementation Oregon Framework • ODE will: • Provide models and related tools • Develop an online resource bank for districts • Assurances template – due July 1, 2013 • http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?id=3478 • OEA Guidebook, website, & resources • www.oregoned.org/evalresources • Training for educators and evaluators

  22. Timeline for Implementation SUMMER 2012 UPDATE

More Related