1 / 16

How to Improve Teaching Learning: Selecting, Implementing and Evaluating Digital Resources

How to Improve Teaching Learning: Selecting, Implementing and Evaluating Digital Resources. Joe Tront, Virginia Tech Flora McMartin, Broad-base Knowledge. Agenda. 8:00 am Welcome and Introductions 8 :10 am Background on the Workshop and Courseware Example

presley
Download Presentation

How to Improve Teaching Learning: Selecting, Implementing and Evaluating Digital Resources

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. How to Improve Teaching Learning: Selecting, Implementing and Evaluating Digital Resources Joe Tront, Virginia Tech Flora McMartin, Broad-base Knowledge

  2. Agenda 8:00 am Welcome and Introductions 8:10 am Background on the Workshop and Courseware Example 8:20 am Sources for Finding Courseware and Learning Materials 8:30 am Explore Sources on Your Own 8:45 am Overview of Framework for Selecting Materials 9:00 am Practice Applying Framework 9:15am Report Back, Discussion and Wrap-up 9:30am Adjourn 20011 FIE - Rapid City, SD

  3. An Example of What We Mean by ‘Courseware’ 20011 FIE - Rapid City, SD

  4. Framework for Selecting Learning Technologies …begins with an understanding of the environment in which it will be used Establish Course Goals TGI* Identify Student Learning Outcomes Student Learning Outcomes 7 principles Design Learning Environment Questions to Consider Design Learning Activities (e.g., computer or other non-computer) Design Learning Process (e.g., individual or collaborative) Assess Student Learning * See references 20011 FIE - Rapid City, SD

  5. Teaching Goals & Student Learning Outcomes • Higher - Order Thinking Skills • Basic Academic & Communication Skills • Discipline – Specific Knowledge & Skills • Liberal Arts & Academic Values • Work & Career Preparation • Personal Development A PDF version of Angelo & Cross’s Teaching Goals Inventory and self score-able worksheet is available at: apps.carleton.edu/campus/call/assets/Teaching_Goals_Inventory.pdf 20011 FIE - Rapid City, SD

  6. 7 Principles of Good Practice in Higher Education Good practice • Encourages student – instructor contact • Encourages cooperation among students • Encourages active learning • Gives prompt feedback • Emphasizes time on task • Communicates high expectations • Respects diverse talents and ways of learning “Seven Principles” originally appeared in the March 1987 AAHE Bulletin. Chickering & Ehrmann. (1996). Implementing the Seven Principles: Technology as Lever http://www.tltgroup.org/programs/seven.html 20011 FIE - Rapid City, SD

  7. Places to Find Courseware & Learning Materials • Engineering Pathways – www.engineeringpathway.com/ • NSDL – www.nsdl.org • MERLOT – www.merlot.org • Open Courseware Consortium - www.ocwconsortium.org • I-Tunes University 20011 FIE - Rapid City, SD

  8. Designing Computer-Based Learning Activities Establish Course Goals Computer Based Learning Activity Identify Student Learning Outcomes Search for Resources Design Learning Environment Design Learning Activities (e.g., computer or other non-computer) Design Learning Process (e.g., individual or collaborative) Review Resources for Applicability Select Resource & Continue Activity Design Assess Student Learning 20011 FIE - Rapid City, SD

  9. Premier Award Criteria: Instructional Design • Learning goals and outcomes • Learning outcomes and goals are clearly stated; supported by the software and learning experiences. • Interactivity • The learner is actively involved in the learning process—the interaction enhances learning • Cognition/Conceptual change • Learning appears to be significant and long lasting, and strong and useful cognitive models can be built • Content • The content is well chosen and structured • Multimedia use • Multimedia is used effectively and promotes the learning objectives and goals • Instructional use/Adaptability • The software can be used in a variety of settings 20011 FIE - Rapid City, SD

  10. Premier Award Criteria: Software Design • Engagement • The software holds the interest of a diversity of learners • Learner Interface and Navigation • The software is easy to use • Technical Reliability • The software is free from technical problems 20011 FIE - Rapid City, SD

  11. Premier Award Criteria: Content • Content is Accurate • The content is accurate • Organization of Content • The content is consistent with typical engineering instruction • Consistent with Learning Objectives • The content matches the stated learning objectives and goals 20011 FIE - Rapid City, SD

  12. Questions to Consider (7 Principles) • Does the courseware encourage desirable behavior? • student-faculty contact • cooperation among students • active learning • Does this courseware provide prompt feedback? • From instructors or peers • automated feedback • feedback tailored to student • Does this courseware emphasize time on task? • Does this material communicate high expectations? • Does this courseware address diverse learning styles? • Treat student needs individually; active vs. passive 20011 FIE - Rapid City, SD

  13. Questions to Consider (Student Learning Outcomes) • Does this courseware support my teaching goals • higher order thinking skills • basic academic and communication skills • discipline-specific knowledge and skills • liberal arts and academic values • work and career preparation • personal development 20011 FIE - Rapid City, SD

  14. Questions to Consider (Practical) • Students easily grasp how to use this courseware? • Students have access to the necessary support? • Will the courseware work reliably? • How much technical support needed? • Do I have access to the tech. necessary support? • How much time will it take for me to learn how to use this courseware? • Do I have the time to do so? • What will it cost me? • Is this the best tool/process to help my students learn? meet the • Does it match my teaching style? • Does it solve a teaching or student learning problem for me? 20011 FIE - Rapid City, SD

  15. Judging the Quality of Courseware: Some Resources • Engineering Pathway Premier Award Criteria • http://www.engineeringpathway.com/ep/premier/2011/criteria.jhtml;jsessionid=EIMQB5LC5320FABAVRSSFEQ • MERLOT Peer Review Criteria • http://taste.merlot.org/evaluationcriteria.html • ACHIVE’s Rubrics for Evaluating Open Education Resource (OER) Objects • http://www.achieve.org/files/AchieveOERRubrics.pdf • IKNEER – Interactive Knowledge Networks for Engineering Education • http://ci4ene04.ecn.purdue.edu/ikneer/index.php 20011 FIE - Rapid City, SD

  16. How to Improve Teaching Learning: Selecting, Implementing and Evaluating Digital Resources Joe Tront – Virginia Tech - jgtront@vt.org Flora McMartin – Broad-base Knowledge – flora.mcmartin@gmail.com

More Related