html5-img
1 / 25

Educator Effectiveness from A to Z in a Small District

Educator Effectiveness from A to Z in a Small District. CASE Presentation July 2014. Introduction. Who we are… Why we’re here… Our assumptions…. Background. Roll Out Rubric Pilot Spring 2012-13 Hold Harmless Full Implementation 2013-14 Principals Teachers Special Service Providers.

portia-mcmahon
Download Presentation

Educator Effectiveness from A to Z in a Small District

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Educator Effectiveness from A to Z in a Small District CASE Presentation July 2014

  2. Introduction • Who we are… • Why we’re here… • Our assumptions…

  3. Background • Roll Out • Rubric Pilot Spring 2012-13 • Hold Harmless Full Implementation 2013-14 • Principals • Teachers • Special Service Providers

  4. 2013-14 Metrics • 192 Certified Staff – 100% Implementation • Staff Survey Results • Rubric expectations clear (88%) and fair (82%) • SGO process clear (67%) and fair (83%) • Survey results beneficial (66%) • Feedback from evaluator useful (90%) and fair (94%) • Online system easy to use (95%) • Overall effectiveness rating clear (91%) and fair (81%)

  5. Background • Support Structures • District Evaluation Committee • Administrative Leadership Team • District Lead

  6. District Evaluation Committee • Primary Roles • Messaging • Communication • Decision Making • Feedback Loop • Peer Support • Structure • Monthly Meetings • Reports to Buildings • In-Building Assistance • Collaboration Day Planning, Training, & Support

  7. Administrative Leadership Team • Primary Roles • Direction • Timelines • Norming • Filtering • Structure • Monthly Meetings • School Visitations • Adopt-a-School

  8. District Lead • Primary Roles • Strategic Leadership • Research & Preparation • Facilitation • Follow-Up • Structure • Ongoing • Stipend/Partial FTE • Office Hours Support

  9. Educator Effectiveness Components • State & District assessments; Other assessments measuring student achievement and growth Evaluation Rubric, Observations, Surveys & Artifacts

  10. Evaluation Rubric Insights • Keep State Element/Practice Wording • Provide Clarifications with District Interpretations • Use Student/Teacher Survey to Support Ratings • Encourage Sharing of Self-Reflection • Share Initial Admin Ratings by January (1st year) • Staff Write a Professional Goal

  11. WPSD Growth Components • 20% School/District Performance Framework (Collectively Attributed) • 80% Measures of Student Learning (Individually Attributed)

  12. 20% School Performance Framework (SPF) Scoring Matrix

  13. 80% Measures of Student Learning • Looking for Evidence of Effectiveness • Multiple opportunities with 3 “Looks” • System modeled off Poudre School District

  14. Growth Modeling Measures • TCAP, MAP, & DIBELS • 2 Years of Data Required • Cutpoint Considerations (Handout) • WPSD 1st Look Scoring Plan (Brochure) 1st Look: Proficient or Advanced Rating = Teacher’s Growth Score Below Proficient Not Applicable

  15. District Learning Measures • District Approved Assessments • 2 Years of Data • Roll-Out in 2014-15 2nd Look: Proficient or Advanced Rating = Teacher’s Growth Score Below Proficient Not Applicable

  16. Student Growth Objectives • Purposely designed growth objectives (SGOs) formed through a collaborative process between the evaluatee and evaluator • Adapted from Achieve New Jersey 3rd Look: • Final rating determined at the end of the evaluation year based on data from the SGO

  17. What is a SGO? A Student Growth Objective is a long-term academic goal that staff set for groups of students and must be: • Specific and measureable • Aligned to standards • Based on available prior student learning data • A measure of what a student has learned between two points in time

  18. Steps in the SGO Process Step 1: Choose or develop a quality assessmentsaligned to standards Step 2: Determine students’ starting points Step 3: Set ambitious and achievable SGOs including full attainment standards Step 4: Track progress & refine instruction Step 5: Review results and score in consultation with your evaluator

  19. SGO Insights • Training! Support! Samples! Time! • Evaluators • Staff • Professional Development • Assessment • Learning Objectives • Data Collection & Analysis • Trust

  20. Dashboard Online Tool • Developed over the school year with Paul Fleming of ExModula • Overview of the site

  21. WPSD System Logistics • Evaluation Cycles & Timelines (Handout) • Implementation Stepped Out Piece by Piece

  22. Implementation Timeline

  23. WPSD Next Steps • District Approved Assessment Process (2nd Look) • Support Structures for Partially/Ineffective Staff • Appeals Process • Evaluator Professional Development • Retiring Teacher Process

  24. Questions

  25. Contact Information • Tina Cassens – WPSD Director of Educator Effectiveness tcassens@wpsdk12.org • Paul Fleming – ExModulapaulf@exmodula.com • Achieve New Jersey - http://www.state.nj.us/education/AchieveNJ/

More Related