1 / 13

Performance Framework Pre-Trial Run Draft Discussion

This presentation, delivered to the Hawaii Public Charter School Commission's Performance & Accountability Committee on November 29, 2012, reviews the development process of performance frameworks. It covers the frameworks' purpose, highlights key components, and provides updates on the financial, academic, and organizational frameworks. Discussion includes conference calls with Commission liaisons, revisions based on feedback, and insights on indicators aligned with Act 130 and NACSA Core Framework. The meeting aims to address committee questions and clarify the frameworks' content.

pierrette-roger
Download Presentation

Performance Framework Pre-Trial Run Draft Discussion

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Performance Framework Pre-Trial Run Draft Discussion Presented to Hawaii Public Charter School Commission’s Performance & Accountability Committee Presented November 29, 2012

  2. Goals • Review the purpose of the performance frameworks and provide a brief update on the performance framework development process • Highlight important pieces of the performance frameworks • Answer questions from the Committee members regarding the framework content and process

  3. Performance Framework

  4. Performance Framework Progress • Held conference calls with Commission liaisons and CSAO staff on each of the framework drafts • Revised frameworks based on calls to create pre-trial run frameworks • Completed initial financial framework trial run • In the process of collecting data for the academic framework trial run

  5. Hawaii Academic Framework Indicators

  6. Highlights of Academic Framework Pre-Trial Run Draft • Aligns with Act 130 and NACSA Core Framework • Growth-to-standard likely to be included in future iterations of state system and therefore is not called out separately in framework • Comparison measures are currently labeled as standard but Commission could choose to make optional

  7. Hawaii Financial Framework Indicators

  8. Highlights of Financial Framework Pre-Trial Run Draft • Removed debt measures from NACSA Core Framework (i.e. debt default, debt service coverage ration) • Strengthened target for debt to asset ratio • Added unrestricted fund balance percentage and change in total fund balance

  9. Hawaii Organizational Framework Indicators

  10. Highlights of Organizational Framework Pre-Trial Run Draft • Aligned with Act 130 and other laws, rules, and policies, as well as the NACSA Core Framework • Continuing to ensure alignment between organizational framework and charter contract template drafts

  11. DRAFT Standard Performance Frameworks Development Timeline

  12. Discussion www.qualitycharters.org

More Related