160 likes | 198 Views
This chapter explores the historical progression of disability models, highlighting the shift to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) and its significance in therapeutic recreation (TR) practice, research, and education. Beginning with earlier linear disability models to the holistic biopsychosocial approach of the ICF, the chapter delves into the ICF's key concepts, coding system, and application in clinical practice and research. Embracing the social model, the ICF emphasizes the impact of environmental factors on individuals' functioning and participation, offering a comprehensive framework for assessing and improving well-being in TR settings.
E N D
The Role of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) in TR Practice, Research, and Education Chapter 4 HPR 453
Earlier Models of Disability, Health and Functioning • Original Disability Model (Linear) Nagi (1965) • If active pathology was present, impairment, functional limitation, disability would follow • ICIDH for trial purposes WHO (1980) – no support due to lack of cross-cultural applicability – no international support • Described 3 concepts of disease and health: Impairments, Disabilities, Handicaps • NCMRR (1993)To guide outcome measurement and research • Linear to show course of disease or pathology but acknowledged that social policies and barriers limited participation in society = Society could impose disability
ICIDH revised from 1997-1999 and renamed International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) • Overall aim…to provide a unified and standardized language and framework for the description of health and health-related states. • WHO endorsed as international standard in 2001
Shift from Medical Model Social Model • From medical model that focused on disability holistic model of health and well-being • From disability needing an intervention to “fix the problem” a more complete picture of health status by describing behavioral aspects of chronic diseases • Social Model – Individuals experience disability as a result of their interaction with barriers in their environment (i.e. stairs) ICF is biopsychosocial model
Endorsed by ATRA and NTRS • ICF provides a model for clinical practice, professional education and research • Endorsed by ATRA in 2005 and NTRS in 2008 – ATRA has an ICF Team • Comparable with recreational therapy practice and should be used in Practice Guidelines, Standards of Practice, Curriculum Development, Public policy, International Relations, and Research
ICF ModelWHO (2001) • 4 primary purposes • Provide scientific basis for understanding and studying health and health-related states, outcomes, and determinants • Common language to improve communication between users (h.c. workers, researchers, policy-makers, the public, including people with disabilities • Permit comparison of data across countries, healthcare disciplines and time • Provide systematic coding system for health information systems
ICF has 2 PartsEach Part has 2 components WHO (2001) • Functioning and Disability • Body Functions and Structures • Activity and Participation • Contextual Factors and Components • Environmental Factors • Personal Factors • Not linear – Arrows indicate interaction after a change in health condition to improve well-being (Important for TR – we restore well-being)
Coding the ICF • Will be used soon by healthcare professionals to collect functional data • Classification system and not assessment • Data will pertain to a particular session • Contextual factors will result in variability because each session is a snapshot in the big picture (i.e. more alert in morning than afternoon – contextual factors play a role)
Definitions of key concepts and terms • Body Function – physiological and psychological functions of body systems • Body Structures – anatomical – organs, limbs and their components • Impairments – problems in function or structure (i.e. significant deviation or loss) • Activity – Execution of a task or action • Participation – involvement in a life situation
Activity Limitations – difficulties an individual may have in executing activities • Participation Restrictions – problems experienced in involvement in life activities • Environmental Factors – physical, social, and attitudinal components in which live and conduct their lives
CODING • BS – “s” (anatomical) • structure of brain, structure of heart, etc • 3 qualifiers to describe extent of impairment, nature of the change and location of the impairment • CTRS won’t code much in BS but must understand codes • BF – “b” • Physiological and psychological functions • 1 qualifier to describe level of impairment with b.f. • CTRS will code (i.e. temperament and personality, attention, exercise tolerance, etc)
A&P – “d” • Activities commonly performed in life (daily routine, conversation, climbing, managing diet and meals, forming relationships, play, taking care of animals, crafts, etc) Meaningful activity • 4 qualifiers (2 capacity and 2 performance) • Capacity = Ability in standard environment • Performance = inreal life situations • Coding more complex than previous categories
EF – “e” • Things in environment which facilitate or hinder health and functioning • Equipment, attitudes, social policies • Codes attached to A&P to reflect effect on a specific activity or participation • PF – recognized but not currently included due to large cultural and social variance (i.e. gender, coping styles)
Why you need to know this…. • Will soon be used by clinicians for payers because functional status is much better predictor of health system usage than diagnostic information • ICF includes a chapter related to social, civic, and community functioning that recognizes recreation and leisure as an important aspect of functioning
Related to TR Practice • Functional status and holistic approach to individual and his/her environment • Inter-professional communication • CTRSs will use same language as other disciplines (i.e. cognitive domain) • Core sets related to health conditions – 12 developed – more being developed – Table 4.2 • See case study on pgs 53-55